✦ ❖ ✦
DAAT · LEVEL 4 — HALAKHA LE-MA'ASSE / PSAK

שולחן ערוך · יורה דעה

Siman 121 — Kashering vessels bought from a non-Jew: hag'ala, libbun, rinsing — the kashering follows the way the vessel was used
סימן קכ״א · הלכה למעשה
סֵדֶר הֶכְשֵׁר כֵּלִים הַנִּקְנִים מִן הָעוֹבֵד כּוֹכָבִים
פסק המחבר והרמ״א · הכרעת נושאי הכלים · הסקת ההלכה למקרים בני זמננו
⚖️ פסק הלכה ולמעשה ⚖️
✦ ❖ ✦

Halakha le-ma'asse — the practical ruling

From the ruling of the Mehaber and the Rama, through the arbitration of the Taz,
the Shach and the Pitchei Teshuva, down to glass, porcelain, enamel and today's cookware

Subject:
שולחן ערוך יורה דעה סימן קכ״א (ז׳ סעיפים)
with the nossei kelim: ט״ז, ש״ך, פתחי תשובה, ערוך השולחן

⚠ Level caveat:
This level is not "Daat HaRav": the Shulchan Aruch HaRav
(Admur HaZaken) does not cover Yoreh De'ah, hence not Siman 121.
It is a level of practical psak: what one does, and whom to ask.

Written and studied by:
הרב יוסף חיים סממה · DAAT

How to read this level. Every statement here is anchored either in the text of the Shulchan Aruch and its nossei kelim (Taz, Shach, Pitchei Teshuva), or in a named, checkable source (Gemara, Rambam, Arukh HaShulchan). On Yoreh De'ah there is no Mishnah Berurah (which comments only on Orach Chaim), and no Shulchan Aruch HaRav / Daat HaRav (the Admur HaZaken did not write Yoreh De'ah). The siman itself refers the technical details of hag'ala and libbun to Hilkhot Pesach (Orach Chaim 451-452), so they are quoted from where they actually stand. Every concrete application (le-ma'asse) ends with a referral to your Rav: real cases turn on questions of fact — which metal, which coating, how the vessel was actually used, hot or cold, on the fire or inside a pot — that only a posek who sees your situation can decide.

📑 תוכן העניינים

  1. שורש הסימן — as it was used, so it is kashered; כבולעו כך פולטו
  2. פסק המחבר והרמ״א — the map of the seven seifim
  3. תשמיש בצונן — rinsing, scrubbing, tevila (seif 1)
  4. תשמיש בחמין — hag'ala, and the order of hag'ala and tevila (seif 2)
  5. תשמיש על ידי האור — libbun, frying pan, spit and grill (seifim 3-4)
  6. הגעיל את הצריך ליבון — cold use, occasional and regular (seif 5)
  7. הכשר מקצת הכלי — חם מקצתו חם כולו against כבולעו כך פולטו (seif 6)
  8. סכין — thrusting, sharpening, libbun and notches (seif 7)
  9. פסיקת הספרדים — the Mehaber, glass, and the Sephardic poskim
  10. פסיקת האשכנזים — the Rama, Arukh HaShulchan and the acharonim
  11. מקרים מודרניים — glass, porcelain, enamel, stainless steel, pans, oven
  12. סיכום מעשי וטבלאות — in practice, and ask your Rav

📜 The text of the Shulchan Aruch — Seif Alef

הלוקח כלים ישנים מן העובד כוכבים כדרך שנשתמש בהן העובד כוכבים כך הוא הכשרן לפיכך הלוקח כלי תשמיש ישנים שנשתמש בהם בצונן כגון כוסות וצלוחיות וכיוצא בהן מדיחן וצריך לשפשפן היטב במים בשעת הדחה כדי להסיר ולמרק האיסור שעל גביהן ואחר כך שוטפן במים ומטבילן והם מותרים:

הגה יש מקומות שנהגו היתר לשום יין בכלים שנסריהם מדובקים בחלב משום שטבע היין לברוח מן החלב והחלב נקרש ועומד בעצמו ואינו נוגע כלל ביין (ריב״ש סימן קמ״ט):

The kashering follows the use. One who buys used vessels from a non-Jew: in the manner the non-Jew used them, so is their kashering. Therefore one who buys used table vessels that were used cold — cups, flasks and the like — rinses them, and he must scrub them well in water at the time of rinsing, in order to remove and scour off the forbidden matter clinging to their surface; then he washes them in water and immerses them (tevila), and they are permitted.

Rama: there are places whose custom permits putting wine into vessels whose staves are sealed with חלבḥelev, animal tallow, not milk — because the nature of wine is to flee from the tallow: the tallow congeals and stands on its own, and does not touch the wine at all (Rivash siman 149).

— Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah 121:1 · Sefaria YD 121:1

1. שורש הסימן — as it was used, so it is kashered

The foundation. Siman 121 does not ask "is this vessel forbidden?" but "how is it made usable again?". Its single rule is a rule of symmetry: a vessel absorbed the forbidden matter through a certain heat, and it will release it through that same heat. Hence the formula of the Mishnah and the Gemara — כבולעו כך פולטו — and the grading into four degrees: cold, boiling water, direct fire, and the separate case of earthenware.

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:א : « הלוקח כלים ישנים מן העובד כוכבים כדרך שנשתמש בהן העובד כוכבים כך הוא הכשרן »

עבודה זרה ע״ה ע״ב : « הלוקח כלי תשמיש מן הגוים את שדרכו להטביל יטביל להגעיל יגעיל ללבן באור ילבן באור השפוד והאסכלא מלבנן באור הסכין שפה והיא טהורה »

פסחים ל׳ ע״ב : « עץ פרור מגעילו ברותחין ובכלי ראשון קסבר כבולעו כך פולטו »

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף א : « כלל גדול אמרו חז״ל בדין פליטת איסורים דכדרך תשמישן כך הכשרן דכבולעו כך פולטו »

The four degrees. The baraita in Avodah Zarah, copied word for word by the Rambam, aligns the kashering with the use: nothing absorbed (a new vessel) → tevila alone; cold (cups, flasks) → rinsing then tevila; boiling water (cauldrons, kettles) → hag'ala then tevila; direct fire (spits, grills) → libbun then tevila. Earthenware forms a fifth case, outside the scale: it has no remedy.

עבודה זרה ע״ה ע״ב : « דברים שנשתמש בהן על ידי צונן כגון כוסות וקתוניות וצלוחיות מדיחן ומטבילן והם טהורין »

רמב״ם הלכות מאכלות אסורות פרק י״ז הלכה ג : « ודברים שנשתמש בהן על ידי חמין כגון יורות וקמקמוסין ומחממי חמין מגעילן ומטבילן והן מתרין »

רמב״ם הלכות מאכלות אסורות פרק י״ז הלכה ג : « ודברים שנשתמש בהן על ידי האור כגון שפודין ואסכלאות מלבנן באור עד שתנשר קלפתן ומטבילן והן מתרין »

Why libbun, and not hag'ala, for what met the fire?

The Gemara sets two regimes side by side: among kodashim, the spit is kashered by hag'ala; for the vessels of non-Jews, it demands libbun. Rav Sheshet gives the reason: there, what was absorbed was permitted; here, what was absorbed was forbidden. Those four words govern the whole siman — and they are what will decide, at seif 4, whether a frying pan goes through fire or through boiling water.

עבודה זרה ע״ו ע״א : « מה ענין קדשים אצל גיעולי גוים הכא היתירא בלע התם איסורא בלע »

2. פסק המחבר והרמ״א — the map of the seven seifim

Siman 121 has seven seifim — a short siman, and practical throughout. The Mehaber lays out the ladder of kasherings; the Rama (הגה) adjusts it by Ashkenazi custom, almost always toward stringency lekhatchila and leniency bedieved. Here is the overall map, as it emerges from the text itself.

SeifSubjectRuling (anchored in the text)
1used vessels, cold useThe mother-rule: as the non-Jew used them, so is their kashering. Cold use (cups, flasks) → rinsing with vigorous scrubbing to remove the clinging forbidden matter, then washing, then tevila. Rama: a custom permitting wine in vessels whose staves are sealed with tallow (חֵלֶב, ḥelev — animal fat, not milk) — the wine flees the congealed tallow (Rivash).
2used vessels, hot useMetal, wood or stone → hag'ala; metal then tevila. If he immersed before the hag'ala → permitted; yesh omrim: he must immerse again. Rama: no hag'ala on a vessel that is ben yomo; the hag'ala water may not be used; planing the vessel with a craftsman's tool does not replace hag'ala; bone vessels → Hilkhot Pesach 451.
3the details of hag'ala and libbunAn explicit cross-reference: "the laws of hag'ala and libbun are written in Hilkhot Pesach" — that is, Orach Chaim 451-452, which remain the technical basis of this siman.
4the frying pan (מחבת)Even though for chametz on Pesach hag'ala suffices, for other prohibitions the pan requires libbun — because chametz is "permitted matter absorbed", and other prohibitions are not.
5hag'ala done where libbun was requiredIt remains forbidden to use it hot, even off the fire. Rama: cold use remains permitted lekhatchila by rinsing and scrubbing — but only occasionally or bedieved; for regular use, some require hag'ala or libbun (a decree lest one come to use it hot). Silver in which wine may have been warmed, and chests and tables → hag'ala lekhatchila. Earthenware used cold → careful washing and rinsing suffice, and one may then put in even vinegar and spices.
6kashering part or the wholeMehaber: although "part of it hot, all of it hot" forbids the entire vessel, the kashering is not achieved unless one kashers the whole, in hag'ala as in libbun. Rama: that holds only if the whole vessel was used; if it is known that only part was used → כבולעו כך פולטו, that part suffices.
7a knife bought from a non-JewFor cold use, if it has no notches: ten thrusts into hard ground, each in a fresh spot — and that suffices even to cut a sharp food such as a radish. For regular use → no better than other vessels. Notches, cutting hot, or shechitah → libbun, or thorough sharpening on a blacksmith's whetstone over the whole blade. Rama: sharpening helps for cold only, and such is the practice lekhatchila; a handle preventing libbun → libbun then hag'ala; bedieved, libbun without hag'ala (or the reverse) does not forbid what was cut.
כלל הפסק של הסימן :
כלל אחד חותך את כל הסימן — כדרך תשמישו כך הכשרו, ויסודו כבולעו כך פולטו. צונן — הדחה ושפשוף ; חמין — הגעלה ; אור — ליבון ; חרס — אין לו תקנה. וכל ספק בדרך התשמיש מחמיר את ההכשר ואינו מקל בו, ולכן קבע חמור מעראי, ולכתחלה חמור מדיעבד.

3. תשמיש בצונן — rinsing, scrubbing, tevila (seif 1)

What the Mehaber actually requires. For a vessel used only cold, the forbidden matter was not absorbed into the wall: it merely sits on it. The remedy is therefore mechanical, not thermal — and the Mehaber insists on a step people forget: rinsing is not enough, one must scrub in the water to scour off what clings.

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:א : « מדיחן וצריך לשפשפן היטב במים בשעת הדחה כדי להסיר ולמרק האיסור שעל גביהן »

Who needs tevila? The Shach specifies that the tevila mentioned here concerns metal alone — that is the subject of the preceding siman (120); wood, stone and earthenware are not bound by it. Do not confuse the two operations: hag'ala removes the absorbed taste, tevila moves the vessel from the non-Jew's ownership into Israel's. The heart of Siman 121 is the kashering; tevila appears here only as a second step.

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ב : « דוקא כלי מתכת צריך טבילה כדלעיל סימן ק״כ ולקמן ס״ב »

New vessels, and earthenware

The Shach, citing the Issur veHeter HaArokh, settles two everyday cases. First, a new vessel bought at the market raises no suspicion at all: it was not used, so no kashering is needed — only, if it is metal, the tevila of siman 120. Second, earthenware about which one is in doubt whether it was used hot has no recourse but breaking.

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ט״ו : « אבל כלים חדשים שקונים מן השוק אפי׳ בכלי חרס אין צריך לספק בהן דאין דרכן להשתמש בכלים חדשים »

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ט״ו : « אבל שאר כלי חרס שקנה מן העובד כוכבים אם רק מסופק בו שנשתמש בחמין צריכין שבירה »

Le-ma'asse (cold use). A vessel used only cold: wash it thoroughly with scrubbing, not merely run it under water; then rinse; then, if it is metal (or glass, according to some), tevila in a mikveh — see siman 120. Note: "it was used only cold" is a statement of fact, and the Rama (seif 5) shows that it is not readily granted for a vessel one intends to use regularly. For the application to your situation, consult your Rav.

4. תשמיש בחמין — hag'ala, and the order of hag'ala and tevila (seif 2)

לקח מהם כלים שנשתמש בהם בחמין בין שהם של מתכת או של עץ או אבן מגעילן ואחר כך מטבילן אם הם של מתכת והם מותרים ואם הטבילן ואחר כך הגעילן מותרים ויש אומרים שצריך לחזור ולהטבילן
— Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah, siman 121, seif 2
Three materials, one kashering. The Mehaber places metal, wood and stone on the same footing: all three are kashered by hag'ala. Only metal then adds tevila. This follows directly from the rule of symmetry: what absorbed through boiling water releases through boiling water.

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ב : « לקח מהם כלים שנשתמש בהם בחמין בין שהם של מתכת או של עץ או אבן מגעילן ואחר כך מטבילן אם הם של מתכת »

If one immersed before the hag'ala, must one immerse again?

The Mehaber brings two views. The first permits: tevila is not a purification from an impurity that the hag'ala would remove — it is a decree in its own right. The Taz explains it so, and attributes to the yesh omrim the motive of טובל ושרץ בידו ("one who immerses while holding the impure creature"). The Shach rules in practice: one immerses again, but without a blessing. The Pitchei Teshuva, in the name of the Dagul MeRevava, adds a decisive distinction: if the vessel is not ben yomo, all agree one may immerse first — there is then no "creature in hand" at all.

ט״ז יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק א : « דאין הטבילה צורך ההגעלה אלא שיצא בטבילה מטומאה לטהרה »

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ה : « ונראה דיש לחזור ולהטבילן בלא ברכה »

פתחי תשובה יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ג : « עיין בדגמ״ר שכ׳ דאם אינם ב״י לכ״ע שרי להטביל תחלה שהרי אין כאן טובל ושרץ בידו »

The Rama's four precisions. (1) One does not kasher a vessel that is ben yomo — used within the past twenty-four hours; the Taz indeed wonders why the Rama did not also copy from the Tur the alternative: either that it not be ben yomo, or that the water hold sixty times its volume. (2) One does not use the hag'ala water. (3) Planing the vessel with the craftsman's tool does not replace hag'ala. (4) Before the hag'ala one scrubs the vessel to remove its rust — this is the Tur, quoted by the Shach.

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ב : « אין להגעיל שום כלי כל זמן שהוא בן יומו »

ט״ז יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ב : « ואין מגעילין הכלי עד שלא יהא ב״י או שיהיו במים שמגעילין בו ס׳ כנגדו »

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ב : « כל מקום שצריך הגעלה לא מהני אם קלפו לכלי בכלי אומנות »

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ג : « וכתב הטור כיצד היא הגעלה ישפשף הכלי היטב כדי להעביר החלודה שבו ואח״כ מגעילן »

In what vessel? The rule of majority use. The siman refers the modalities to Hilkhot Pesach, where the Mehaber lays down the rule that still governs our kitchens: every vessel follows its majority use. A pot standing on the fire is kashered in a kli rishon; a plate onto which one pours from the pot is kashered by iruy — except that the Rama adds there the custom of treating everything as a kli rishon.

שו״ע או״ח תנ״א:ו (OC 451:6) : « כל כלי הולכין בו אחר רוב תשמישו הילכך קערות אע״פ שלפעמים משתמשין בהם בכלי ראשון על האש »

Le-ma'asse (hot use). A metal, wooden or stone vessel that has cooked: wait twenty-four hours from the last use; clean it and remove all rust and residue; hag'ala in the boiling water of a kli rishon; then, for metal, tevila. The normal order is hag'ala then tevila; if the order was reversed, one immerses again without a blessing (Shach). The volume of water, the type of vessel, the presence of cracks or rust one cannot reach — all are questions of fact. For the application to your situation, consult your Rav.

5. תשמיש על ידי האור — libbun, frying pan, spit and grill (seifim 3-4)

An explicit cross-reference. Seif 3 is the shortest in the siman, and the most candid: the Mehaber does not restate the technical modalities, he refers them to Hilkhot Pesach. It is there that one finds the definition of libbun ("until sparks fly off it"), the rule of cracks and rust, and the regime of spits and grills.

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ג : « דיני הגעלה וליבון הלא הם כתובים בהלכות פסח »

שו״ע או״ח תנ״א:ד (OC 451:4) : « כלים שמשתמשים בהן ע״י האור כגון שפודים ואסכלאות וכיוצא בהם צריכים ליבון והליבון הוא עד שיהו נצוצות נתזין מהם »

עבודה זרה ע״ו ע״א : « ועד כמה מלבנן אמר רבי מני עד שתשיר קליפתן »

רמ״א או״ח תנ״א:ה (OC 451:5) : « כל הכלים שיש בהם סדקים או גומות או חלודה והוא בתוך הכלי ולא יוכל לנקרן ולנקותן אין להגעילן וצריכין ליבון במקום הסדק והחלודה »

The frying pan: the test case of the siman. Why does a chametz pan need only a hag'ala on Pesach, while the same pan, if it fried forbidden matter, requires libbun? The Taz answers in five words: because it is permitted matter that it absorbed. Chametz, before Pesach, was permitted; the fat of a non-kosher animal never was. This is the היתירא בלע / איסורא בלע of Avodah Zarah, applied to an everyday vessel.

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ד : « מחבת שמטגנים בה אע״פ שלענין חמץ בפסח די לה בהגעלה לענין שאר איסורים צריכה ליבון »

ט״ז יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ג : « די לה בהגעלה. כיון דהיתרא קא בלע »

A meat/milk frying pan: libbun or hag'ala?

The Shach observes that the reason chosen changes everything. If the reason is "permitted matter absorbed", then a milk pan one wishes to turn over to meat likewise needs only a hag'ala. But the Rama MiFano gives another reason: a non-Jew's pan is mostly used without water, in oil or fat — that is, by fire with no intermediary; and by that measure even a meat/milk pan requires libbun. The Shach concludes accordingly. The Arukh HaShulchan reports that Rabbi Akiva Eiger contested this conclusion and held that from meat to milk hag'ala suffices according to all; the Pitchei Teshuva discusses it at length. As to when a use counts as "by fire", the Pitchei Teshuva refers to the Shaarei Teshuva on Orach Chaim 451.

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ח : « ולפ״ז גם במחבת של חלב או בשר צריך ליבון כיון דבלע בלי שום אמצעי »

פתחי תשובה יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ו : « עיין היטב בשערי תשובה בא״ח סימן תנ״א ס״ק כ״ז באיזה אופן נקרא תשמישו ע״י האור »

Le-ma'asse (direct fire). Whatever served on fire without liquid — spit, grill, plancha, frying pan, barbecue grate — is not kashered in boiling water: it needs libbun, and the classical measure is severe (until sparks fly). Many modern vessels cannot withstand it: that is precisely where the question arises. The distinction between libbun hamur and libbun kal, and the fate of a coating, are matters of fact and of dispute. For the application to your situation, consult your Rav.

6. הגעיל את הצריך ליבון — cold use, occasional or regular (seif 5)

An insufficient kashering is not half a kashering. If one performed hag'ala where libbun was required, nothing has been done: it remains forbidden to use the vessel hot, even off the fire. The Taz gives the motive: since the vessel still holds absorbed forbidden matter, we fear a second heating will draw out more. And the same Taz forecloses an over-lenient reading: the bedieved leniency that follows in the Rama's gloss bears on the Rama's own words, not on the Mehaber's rule — there, even bedieved it is forbidden.

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ה : « אם הגעיל כלי הצריך ליבון אסור להשתמש בו בחמין אפילו שלא על ידי האש »

ט״ז יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ד : « שכיון שיש לו בלע של איסור דהא אסור להשתמש בו ע״י האור ע״כ חיישינן שמא יפלוט יותר בחמין שניים »

ט״ז יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ה : « לא קאי רק אדברי ההג״ה אבל אמה שכתב הש״ע אם הגעיל כלי הצריך ליבון כו׳ אפילו דיעבד אסור וזה פשוט »

Cold: occasional (עראי) or regular (קבע)

Here the Rama builds a distinction that recurs in every modern question about cookware. Occasionally — on the road, in a non-Jew's house, or bedieved — one may use an unkashered vessel cold, after careful rinsing and scrubbing. But for regular use, some are stringent and require hag'ala or libbun even for cold use, lest one come to use it hot — "and such is the custom". The Shach adds two glosses: this permission covers all vessels except a knife, which requires the ten thrusts; and "bedieved" here means that he bought it and has no other vessel.

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ה : « אבל מותר להשתמש בו צונן אפילו לכתחלה ע״י הדחה ושפשוף היטב »

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ט : « היינו בכל הכלים מלבד סכין שצריך נעיצה כדלקמן סעיף ז׳ »

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק י״א : « כלו׳ שקנאו שאין לו כלי אחר מותר להשתמש בו »

How far does the custom of kashering reach? The Rama extends it further than one would expect, and that is instructive: even silverware, whose use is cold, is kashered if there is reason to fear wine was warmed in it; even chests and tables bought from non-Jews, lest something boiling was spilled on them. The Shach adds the case of a liquid left standing for twenty-four hours — כבוש כמבושל — and notes that in practice tables are kashered by iruy, poured boiling water, as stated in Orach Chaim.

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ה : « ואפילו כלים שתשמישן בצונן אם יש לחוש שחממו בו יין כגון כלי כסף נוהגין להגעיל ואין לשנות »

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ה : « ואפילו תיבות ושלחנות הנקחים מן העובדי כוכבים נוהגין להגעיל שמא נשפכו עליהם חמין »

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק י״ג : « או שעמד בו יין וכה״ג מע״ל דה״ל כבוש »

Earthenware: the impossible counts as bedieved. Earthenware cannot be kashered — the Gemara says so without appeal. The Rama draws an elegant consequence: since hag'ala is impossible, the situation is deemed bedieved by its very nature; careful washing and rinsing therefore suffice for an earthen vessel used only cold, and one may afterwards put in it even vinegar and spices. The Taz warns against a misreading: in a vessel that absorbed forbidden matter hot, vinegar remains forbidden — only after rinsing and washing, in the Rama's case, is it permitted.

פסחים ל׳ ע״ב : « והתורה העידה על כלי חרס שאינו יוצא מידי דופיו לעולם »

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ה : « וכלי חרס שנשתמשו בו בצונן מאחר דאי אפשר בהגעלה מקרי דיעבד וסגי ליה במריקה ושטיפה היטב »

ט״ז יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ו : « ומיהו ע״י הדחה ושטיפה ודאי שרי כמו שכתב הרשב״א סוף סימן זה לענין שאר דברים חריפים »

רמ״א או״ח תנ״א:א (OC 451:1) : « כל כלי הצריך ליבון או הגעלה אסור להשתמש בו אפי׳ צונן בלא הכשר »

Le-ma'asse (cold use of an unkashered vessel). Occasionally and for want of anything better — travelling, in someone else's home — cold use after careful washing and scrubbing is admitted. For the household's own dishes, no: the custom the Rama ruled is to kasher, precisely because a vessel one keeps will end up being used hot. And if the vessel is earthenware or porcelain, that is another chapter: see section 11. For the application to your situation, consult your Rav.

7. הכשר מקצת הכלי — the whole, or only the part? (seif 6)

The question. A spit, a long ladle, a pot: the forbidden matter touched only part of it. To forbid, we say חם מקצתו חם כולו — part of it heated, the whole vessel is hot, so the whole is forbidden. Should we conclude symmetrically that kashering a part kashers the whole? Or, on the contrary, that the whole must be kashered because the whole was forbidden? Here the Mehaber and the Rama part ways, and this is the one real machloket of the siman.

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ו : « אבל לענין הכשרו לא עלה לו הכשר עד שיכשיר כולו בין לענין הגעלה בין לענין ליבון »

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ו : « ודוקא אם נשתמש בכולו אבל אם ידוע שלא נשתמש רק בקצתו כבולעו כך פולטו »

The two camps, and the arbitration

The Mehaber, following the Rashba, requires kashering the whole vessel, in hag'ala as in libbun. The Rama, following the Tur, applies the symmetry: if it is known that only a part was used, כבולעו כך פולטו — that part suffices. The Taz sharply reproaches the Rama for presenting as an explanation of the Mehaber what is in fact an objection, and inclines to stringency, "especially in a Torah prohibition". The Shach proposes the arbitration that prevailed: for hag'ala, the part may suffice bedieved, but lekhatchila one kashers the whole; for libbun, the whole is required — because libbun does not expel the forbidden matter, it consumes it, and whatever the fire did not reach remains.

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק י״ח : « וסגי בהכשר מקצתו והיינו בדיעבד אבל לכתחלה ג״כ צריך להכשיר כולו »

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף א : « אף אם נשתמש איסור במקצת הכלי ברותחין צריכה כל הכלי הגעלה מפני שהבליעה מתפשטת בכל הכלי »

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף כ״ד : « ולכתחלה יש להחמיר כדעת האוסרים ובדיעבד יש לסמוך על דעת המתירים ובפרט במקום הפסד קצת »

👈 The practical difference the Taz warns about

The Taz has a precise practice in view, and his warning still reads today for a barbecue or a rotisserie spit: those who, while travelling, take a non-Jew's spit and heat only its upper part red-hot — the roasting zone — are not acting well. He concedes, however, that bedieved one will not forbid, and that even lekhatchila, if he heats a long stretch well beyond the area reached, that may suffice.

ט״ז יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ז : « ואם כן לא יפה עושים אותן הולכי דרכים שלוקחים שפוד של עובד כוכבים ומלבנין החלק העליון שצולין בו ולא יותר »

Le-ma'asse (part or whole). Working rule: kasher the entire vessel, handles and grips included — that is what is required lekhatchila, from the Taz to the Shach. A partial kashering is only pleaded after the fact, and mainly for hag'ala; for libbun, one must reach everything that was forbidden. The Arukh HaShulchan sums up the practice: stringency lekhatchila, reliance on the lenient views bedieved, and particularly where there is financial loss. For the application to your situation, consult your Rav.

8. סכין — the knife: thrusting, sharpening, libbun (seif 7)

Why the knife has a regime of its own. The knife is the only vessel whose kashering the Mishnah gives by name: הסכין שפה והיא טהורה. Two reasons combine. First, the blade presses into the food — דוחקא דסכינא — so that even cold use is not settled by a simple rinse. Second, it often carries notches into which nothing penetrates. Hence three distinct remedies: the ten thrusts for cold, sharpening, and libbun.

רמב״ם הלכות מאכלות אסורות פרק י״ז הלכה ז : « הלוקח סכין מן העכו״ם מלבנה באש או משחיזה ברחים שלה »

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ז : « אם אין בה גומות נועצה עשרה פעמים בקרקע קשה וצריך שכל נעיצה ונעיצה תהיה בקרקע קשה »

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ז : « ואפילו לחתוך בו דבר חריף כמו צנון סגי בהכי »

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ז : « ולהשתמש בו בקביעות לא גרע משאר כלי שנוהגין להגעיל אפילו לצונן »

Notches, cutting hot, shechitah. As soon as the blade carries גומות, or one wishes to cut hot food with it, or to use it for shechitah, the regime changes: libbun, or complete sharpening on a blacksmith's whetstone over the whole blade. The Rama at once restricts this: according to others, sharpening avails only for cutting cold — and such is the practice lekhatchila.

שו״ע יו״ד קכ״א:ז : « ואם יש בה גומות (או) שרוצה לחתוך בה חמין או לשחוט בה מלבנה או משחיזה במשחזת של נפחים היטב על פני כולה »

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ז : « וי״א דהשחזה מהני רק לחתוך בה צונן אבל לא לענין חמין »

The handle, and the bedieved regime. The handle often makes it impossible to heat the blade red-hot without destroying everything — already the Gemara's problem on Pesach, which treats the iron and the handle separately. The Rama draws the procedure from it: libbun, then hag'ala. He then opens the bedieved wide: libbun without hag'ala, or hag'ala without libbun on a blade free of notches, do not forbid what was cut — even if the knife was ben yomo. The Shach adds that after a sharpening, bedieved, hot use is permitted.

פסחים ל׳ ע״ב : « קתייהו בטינא ופרזלייהו בנורא והדר מעיילנא לקתייהו ברותחין »

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ז : « ואם לא יוכל ללבן הסכין היטב משום הקתא ילבנו ויגעילנו אח״כ »

רמ״א יו״ד קכ״א:ז : « ומיהו אם לבנו ולא הגעילו אפילו יש בו גומות או אם הגעילו ולא לבנו ואין בו גומות וחתך בו מאכל חם לא נאסר אפילו הסכין בן יומו »

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק כ׳ : « אבל דיעבד אם נשתמש בו רותח אחר ההשחזה אפילו הוא ב״י מותר כמו אחר ההגעלה »

The radish: do the ten thrusts suffice for a sharp food?

The Mehaber says so expressly: even to cut a sharp food such as a radish, the ten thrusts suffice. The Pitchei Teshuva, however, brings the Bechor Shor, who deduces the opposite from Tosafot — the ten thrusts would avail only for an etrog — and concludes that a baal nefesh will refrain. On the other hand, the Arukh HaShulchan observes that in his countries meat is not roasted over the flame: a knife that became treif therefore needs no libbun there, and hag'ala suffices.

פתחי תשובה יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ט : « ולכן כתב דבעל נפש יחוש ולא יאכל צנון ושאר דברים חריפין בסכין טריפה ע״י נעיצה י׳ פעמים »

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף ל״ב : « ונ״ל דבמדינתנו שאין צולין בשר על האש א״צ לסכין שנטרף ליבון ודי בהגעלה »

Le-ma'asse (knife). A second-hand knife, or one that became treif: begin by looking at the blade. Notches, serrations, an encrusted blade-handle joint → none of the light remedies avails, and the handle often rules out libbun. For occasional cold use on a smooth blade: ten thrusts into hard ground, each in a fresh spot. For regular kitchen use, the knife is treated like other vessels. In practice, the great majority of modern knives — riveted blade, composite handle, serrations — fall into none of these simple cases. For the application to your situation, consult your Rav.

9. פסיקת הספרדים — the Sephardic psak

Method note. What follows extends the Mehaber and his nossei kelim. The named contemporary works (Yalkut Yosef, Yabia Omer, Kaf HaChaim) are cited as streams of psak and presented in prose, without quotation marks, since their wording is not reproduced here. Nothing in this paragraph replaces a personal ruling.

The Sephardic psak follows the Mehaber here without detour: the ladder of cold / boiling water / fire, tevila of metal after hag'ala, libbun for the frying pan. It parts company with Ashkenazi custom on one major point: glass. For the Mehaber, glass absorbs nothing — a rinse suffices, even if it was used hot and even for prolonged storage. This is the position taken by contemporary Sephardic poskim (Rav Ovadia Yosef in Yabia Omer, and Yalkut Yosef for everyday practice), with the usual nuances for Pyrex and baking dishes.

שו״ע או״ח תנ״א:כו (OC 451:26) : « כלי זכוכית אפי׳ מכניסן לקיום ואפילו משתמש בהם בחמין אין צריכים שום הכשר שאינם בולעים ובשטיפה בעלמא סגי להו »

Concrete caseSephardic orientation (to verify with a Rav)
Glass, Pyrex, table glasswareGlass does not absorb: rinsing. Metal alone calls for tevila; for glass see siman 120 and local practice.
Metal pot that cooked forbidden foodTwenty-four hours' wait, cleaning, hag'ala in a kli rishon, then tevila (seif 2).
Frying panLibbun, not hag'ala, for prohibitions other than chametz (seif 4); the coating question stands apart.
Earthenware, faience, porcelainNo remedy by hag'ala or libbun (seif 5, Rama; Pesachim). Poskim discuss a route of three hag'alot in case of serious loss — a question for a Rav.
Second-hand knife, cold useTen thrusts into hard ground if the blade is smooth; suffices even for a sharp food (seif 7).

10. פסיקת האשכנזים — the Ashkenazi psak

Method note. The same remark: these streams extend the Rama and the acharonim. The contemporary works (Igrot Moshe, and the standard kashrut compendia) are presented in prose, without quotation, since their exact wording cannot be reproduced here.

The Ashkenazi psak starts from the Rama, and two traits mark it in this siman. (1) Stringency lekhatchila, breadth bedieved: one kashers even what is used cold (silverware, tables), one refuses sharpening for hot use of a knife, one kashers the whole vessel — yet each time the Rama reopens the bedieved. (2) Glass: contrary to the Mehaber, the custom of Ashkenaz is that glass has no remedy at all, hag'ala itself availing nothing. In the same gloss the Rama adds the case of silver vessels lined inside with glass — already, in the sixteenth century, the question of enamel.

רמ״א או״ח תנ״א:כו (OC 451:26) : « ויש מחמירים ואומרים דכלי זכוכית אפי׳ הגעלה לא מהני להו וכן המנהג באשכנז ובמדינות אלו »

Concrete caseAshkenazi orientation (to verify with a Rav)
Glass used hotCustom of Ashkenaz: no kashering, not even by hag'ala (Rama). For glass used only cold, the Arukh HaShulchan attests the widespread custom of buying, scrubbing, rinsing and immersing.
Tableware and silver used coldOne kashers nonetheless, lest it be used hot (Rama, seif 5); bedieved one does not worry.
Partial kasheringRama: the part used suffices; but Taz and Shach require the whole lekhatchila — and for libbun, the whole.
Knife: sharpeningAvails for cold only, and such is the practice lekhatchila (Rama, seif 7); bedieved one is broader.
Enamelled cast iron, coatingsDoubt about the nature of the coating → the Chatam Sofer, quoted by the Pitchei Teshuva, requires libbun out of doubt; the Arukh HaShulchan permits three hag'alot where the loss is serious.
Chabad — only through real sources. The Shulchan Aruch HaRav does not cover Yoreh De'ah; there is therefore no "Daat HaRav" on siman 121. The Admur HaZaken did, however, write Hilkhot Pesach in his Orach Chaim, where the laws of hag'ala and libbun to which this siman explicitly refers (seif 3) are found: that is where — and not here — one looks for his position on the technical modalities. For questions proper to Yoreh De'ah one turns to the responsa of the Tzemach Tzedek and to the Sefer HaMinhagim Chabad where they treat a point explicitly — and one refrains from attributing to him a ruling he did not write here.

11. מקרים מודרניים — glass, porcelain, enamel, stainless steel, pans

How siman 121 lights up our kitchens. Every modern question reduces to three, and only three: (1) what material is the vessel — metal is kasherable, earthenware is not, glass divides the poskim? (2) how was it used — cold, boiling water, or direct fire? (3) would the required kashering destroy it — for a vessel one would spoil is a vessel one fears will not be given a full libbun.
Glass. The Gemara is the foundation: Rav Ashi ranks glass with metal for tevila, because it can be remade when it breaks. But as to absorption the machloket is total: the Mehaber grants it no absorption, the Rama grants it no remedy. The Arukh HaShulchan attests the widespread custom — buying used glass, scrubbing it, rinsing it, immersing it — and recalls that it is not used hot.

ש״ך יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ט״ו : « וכ״ש כלי זכוכית ששתה בהן העובד כוכבים כמה ימים דשרי לישראל לקנותו ממנו להדיחו ולהטבילו »

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף ב : « וכן המנהג הפשוט לקנות כל מיני כלי זכוכית ישנים מן הכותים ומשפשפין היטב ומדיחין אותם במים ומטבילן »

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף ט : « וכלי זכוכית אין בהם תשמיש בחמין »

Earthenware, faience and porcelain. The Gemara's verdict admits no nuance, and the Arukh HaShulchan repeats it: neither hag'ala nor libbun, not even by filling the vessel with coals; the only way out is breaking, or a return to the potter's kiln — for then "a new face has come here". The Arukh HaShulchan is lenient only for small pieces of faience and porcelain into which nothing is ever poured except from a second vessel — cups; large plates and bowls remain forbidden to buy unless new.

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף כ״ה : « דבר ידוע שלכלי חרס לא מהני הגעלה וליבון אף אם הכניס גחלים לתוכו »

Enamel, coatings and alloys. This is the most current question in the siman, and it has already been asked in exactly these terms. The Pitchei Teshuva reports the Chatam Sofer on the iron pots of Cracow covered with a white fused coating (geschmelzt): its composition is a workshop secret, no one knows whether clay enters the melt — hence, if treifut occurred in them, the requirement of a libbun out of doubt, hag'ala not sufficing. The Arukh HaShulchan, facing the same pots in his own country and facing a considerable loss, permitted three hag'alot after twenty-four hours, relying on the authorities who are lenient even for earthenware itself. The same Arukh HaShulchan holds tinning — coating with tin, which presupposes a passage through fire — to be far superior to a hag'ala.

פתחי תשובה יו״ד קכ״א ס״ק ב : « ויש לחוש אולי מחרס נעשה התערובת בהיתוך וכתב דאם אירעו בהו טריפות לא ליעבד להו הגעלה דבעי ליבון מספק »

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף כ״ז : « והתרנום להגעילם ג׳ פעמים אחר מעל״ע »

ערוך השולחן יו״ד סימן קכ״א סעיף י״ד : « ואין הבדיל נדבק להכלי בלתי ליבון ע״י האש כידוע לאומנים נראה דעדיף הרבה מהגעלה »

Modern caseTool of the simanOrientation (to confirm with your Rav)
A new vessel bought in a shopShach s.k. 15No kashering: no prior use is suspected. What remains is the tevila of metal (and of glass according to some) — siman 120, not here.
Glass, Pyrex, glasswareGemara AZ 75b; Mehaber / Rama OC 451:26Sephardim: glass does not absorb, rinsing suffices. Ashkenazim: no remedy for what was used hot. For cold use, the custom attested by the Arukh HaShulchan: scrub, rinse, immerse.
Porcelain, faience, stoneware, ceramicSeif 5 (Rama); Pesachim 30b; AHS 121:25Treated as earthenware: no kashering. A piece used only cold is washed carefully (Rama); a piece one suspects was used hot, no (Shach s.k. 15).
Enamelled cast iron or steelPT s.k. 2 (Chatam Sofer); AHS 121:27Doubt about the coating: libbun out of doubt per the Chatam Sofer; three hag'alot after 24 h in case of serious loss per the Arukh HaShulchan. A question for a Rav, not an automatic rule.
Stainless steel, aluminium, steel — cooking in liquidSeif 2Ordinary metal: 24 h, complete cleaning, hag'ala in a kli rishon, then tevila. Beware rims, handles and welds: lekhatchila the whole vessel (seif 6).
Frying pan, plancha, barbecue grate, spitSeifim 3-4; OC 451:4; Taz s.k. 7Use by fire → libbun, not hag'ala. And not merely the cooking zone: the Taz expressly warns against heating only the upper part of a spit.
Non-stick pan, ceramic coatingSeif 4; the principle of חייס עלייהוThe required libbun destroys the coating — and a kashering one will not dare carry through is no kashering (this is the logic of Pesachim about earthenware one fears to burst). In practice most poskim see no workable kashering. A question for a Rav.
Oven, cooktops, gratesSeif 3 → OC 451-452The siman itself refers to Hilkhot Pesach: that is where libbun kal and libbun hamur, the use of a blowtorch, and the case of the walls are settled. Do not transpose without asking.
Dishwasher, sinks, countertopsSeif 5 (Rama: עראי / קבע); Shach s.k. 14 (עירוי)The siman does not know them, but supplies the grid: occasional or regular use, heat received directly or by pouring. The Shach recalls that tables are kashered by poured boiling water (OC 451:20).
Knives, cutlery, composite-handled utensilsSeif 7; Rama; Gemara Pesachim 30bNotches and joints first: what cannot be cleaned cannot be kashered (Rama OC 451:5). A handle that rules out libbun → libbun then hag'ala, per the Rama.

Le-ma'asse. Three reflexes before any question: (1) use nothing while the question is unresolved — the entire siman is built on prohibitions that cannot be undone; (2) establish the facts — exact material, coating, actual use, date of last use, presence of cracks or rust; (3) distinguish lekhatchila from bedieved, for almost every permission the Rama gives in this siman is an after-the-fact permission. Only then — and because the materials and coatings of today's vessels appear nowhere in the text — consult your Rav.

12. סיכום מעשי — summary and tables

טבלה — the ladder of kasherings

Absorbed useKasheringAnchor
Nothing (new vessel)Tevila alone (metal)Baraita AZ 75b; Rambam 17:3; Shach s.k. 15
Cold (cups, flasks, glassware)Rinsing with scrubbing, then tevilaMehaber seif 1; Rambam 17:3
Boiling water (pots, cauldrons)Hag'ala, then tevila for metalMehaber seif 2; Rambam 17:3
Direct fire (spit, grill, pan)LibbunMehaber seifim 3-4; OC 451:4; AZ 76a
Earthenware, faience, porcelainNo remedy (except return to the kiln)Pesachim 30b; Rama seif 5; AHS 121:25
Knife, cold use, smooth bladeTen thrusts into hard groundMehaber seif 7; Rambam 17:7
Knife, notches or hot useLibbun, or full sharpening (cold only per the Rama)Mehaber and Rama seif 7

טבלה — the conditions of hag'ala

ConditionRuleSource
WaitingThe vessel must not be ben yomo — or the water must hold sixty times its volumeRama seif 2; Taz s.k. 2 (in the name of the Tur)
Prior cleaningScrub off all rust before the hag'alaShach s.k. 3, in the name of the Tur
Cracks, notches, inner rustWhat cannot be cleaned cannot be kashered: libbun at that spotRama OC 451:5
Planing with a toolNever replaces hag'alaRama seif 2
The hag'ala waterIt may not be usedRama seif 2
In what vesselAccording to the majority use: kli rishon, kli sheni or iruyMehaber OC 451:6; the Rama adds the custom of kli rishon
ExtentThe whole vessel lekhatchila; the part used may suffice bedieved (hag'ala)Mehaber and Rama seif 6; Shach s.k. 17-18

טבלה — who says what (the nossei kelim of the siman)

PosekDecisive contribution (anchored in the corpus)
Mehaber (seifim 1-7)The rule of symmetry (as it was used, so it is kashered); the scrubbing during rinsing for cold use; hag'ala for metal, wood and stone, then tevila for metal; the referral of the modalities to Hilkhot Pesach; libbun for the frying pan despite the chametz regime; the kashering must cover the whole vessel; the three remedies of the knife.
Rama (הגה)No hag'ala on a ben yomo; the hag'ala water forbidden; planing of no avail; cold use permitted occasionally but not regularly; silverware, chests and tables kashered by custom; earthenware used cold deemed a bedieved case; partial kashering sufficient where the use was partial; sharpening of the knife limited to cold, and the regime of the handle and of the bedieved.
Taz (Turei Zahav, s.k. 1-7)s.k. 1: tevila is not a requirement of the hag'ala; s.k. 2: the Rama omitted the alternative of sixty volumes; s.k. 3: the chametz pan — it is permitted matter it absorbed; s.k. 4: why hot use stays forbidden after an insufficient hag'ala; s.k. 5: the Rama's bedieved does not redeem the Mehaber's rule; s.k. 6: vinegar, and what rinsing permits; s.k. 7: the long critique of the Rama on partial kashering, and the warning to travellers who heat only the top of a spit.
Shach (Siftei Kohen, s.k. 1-20)s.k. 2: only metal requires tevila; s.k. 3: scrub off rust before the hag'ala; s.k. 5: immerse again without a blessing; s.k. 8: the meat/milk pan under the two reasons; s.k. 9 and 11: the exact scope of the Rama's bedieved; s.k. 13: a liquid left twenty-four hours; s.k. 15: glass, earthenware, new vessels; s.k. 17-18: the arbitration on partial kashering — hag'ala bedieved, libbun never; s.k. 20: sharpening bedieved.
Pitchei Teshuva (s.k. 1-9)s.k. 2: the Chatam Sofer on enamelled iron pots — libbun out of doubt; s.k. 3: the Dagul MeRevava — if the vessel is not ben yomo one may immerse first; s.k. 5: the view requiring a second tevila with a blessing; s.k. 6: referral to the Shaarei Teshuva for the definition of use "by fire"; s.k. 7: Rabbi Akiva Eiger's objection about the pan; s.k. 9: the Bechor Shor on the ten thrusts and sharp foods.
Arukh HaShulchan (YD 121, 32 seifim)Restates the mother-rule in his very first seif; attests the custom regarding glass; restricts the leniency for faience to small pieces of second-vessel use; permits three hag'alot for enamelled pots where the loss is serious; holds tinning superior to hag'ala; concludes that in his countries a treif knife needs only hag'ala.

טבלה — contemporary streams of psak (outside the corpus, to verify)

Sephardim: Yalkut Yosef and Yabia Omer (the school of Rav Ovadia Yosef), Kaf HaChaim. They extend the Mehaber: the cold / boiling / fire ladder, tevila of metal, libbun of the pan — and above all the Mehaber's position that glass does not absorb.
Ashkenazim: Arukh HaShulchan, the acharonim, and for our own day the responsa of the Igrot Moshe. They extend the Rama: a strict custom on glass, stringency lekhatchila and breadth bedieved, vigilance over coatings and alloys.
Chabad: there is no Shulchan Aruch HaRav on Yoreh De'ah. The modalities of hag'ala and libbun are sought in his Orach Chaim (Hilkhot Pesach), to which seif 3 refers; for the rest, only real sources are cited — responsa of the Tzemach Tzedek, Sefer HaMinhagim.

Sefaria links (text and nossei kelim)

Shulchan Aruch YD 121: 121:1 · 121:2 · 121:4 · 121:5 · 121:6 · 121:7
Taz (Turei Zahav): 121 s.k. 3 · 121 s.k. 7
Shach (Siftei Kohen): 121 s.k. 8 · 121 s.k. 15 · 121 s.k. 17
Pitchei Teshuva: 121 s.k. 2 · 121 s.k. 9
Arukh HaShulchan YD 121: 121:1 · 121:25 · 121:27
Upstream sources: Avodah Zarah 75b · 76a · Pesachim 30b · Rambam, Forbidden Foods 17:3 · Orach Chaim 451

👈 הלכה למעשה — the golden rule of this level

  1. In substance, one rule to remember — כדרך תשמישו כך הכשרו: the kashering is set by the heat that caused the absorption, never by the convenience of the one doing the kashering.
  2. Four degrees: cold → rinsing with scrubbing; boiling water → hag'ala; direct fire → libbun; earthenware → nothing.
  3. Three pitfalls: the ben yomo vessel one may not kasher, notches and rust one cannot clean, and the partial kashering that avails only after the fact.
  4. Today's materials — glass, porcelain, enamel, non-stick coatings — do not appear as such in the siman; the acharonim treated them by analogy, and the answer depends on the actual composition.
  5. And for any real case — which material, which use, when, in what state — halakha le-ma'asse goes through your Rav: consult your Rav.

← Level 3 — Synthesis ↑ Siman קכ״א — contents
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
DAAT · הרב יוסף חיים סממה
תלמיד חכם · מעביר שיעורים בהלכה ובחסידות
פסק והלכה למעשה בהכשר כלים הנקנים מן העובד כוכבים · סימן קכ״א · ⚖️ Level 4 — Halakha le-ma'asse
⚠️ This content is for study. The contemporary streams of psika cited (Sephardic and Ashkenazi) are landmarks, not a personal ruling. For any practical application (לְמַעֲשֶׂה), consult a qualified Rav.

DAAT דעת — © 5786 / 2026 · Back to home · Siman קכ״א · ♥ Support

📖Join the khavroutha