✦ ❖ ✦ D A A T · L E V E L 3 — S Y N T H E S I S / R E V I E W ✦ ❖ ✦
Siman 164 — The mortgaged field, and the lender who leases it back
הממשכן שדה לא יחכירנו
Four seifim: the pledge one does not lease back to its owner, the interposed third party, a sale followed by a lease, and the field promised by אסמכתא
Structured review, ruling tables, quick memorisation
Source: Shulchan Aroukh, Yoreh De'ah קס״ד — 4 seifim
Nosei kelim: ש״ך (7 ס״ק) · ט״ז (6 ס״ק) · באר היטב (5 ס״ק) · נקודות הכסף (1) · בית יוסף · טור
Compiled by: הרב יוסף חיים סממה · DAAT
For students who have mastered Levels 1 and 2
daattorah.com
📑 Plan of the synthesis
- The axiom: the advantage that comes from the loan
- The 3 reflex questions
- Master table — the four seifim clause by clause
- The pledge and the lease: what forbids and what permits
- רבית קצוצה or הערמת רבית: Rashi against the Rambam
- משכנתא דסורא: the name changes, the halakha stays cautious
- The sale of seif 3 and its hidden condition
- אסמכתא: the clause that does not work, and the fruits
- The vocabulary of the siman
- Golden rules, mnemonic, pitfalls and a flash card
1. The axiom: the advantage that comes from the loan
The starting point:
The siman never asks whether the rent is fair, nor whether the pledge is equitable. It asks one thing: what the lender draws from the property, does he draw it by reason of the loan? The Rambam gives the decisive image — the borrower עומד בשדהו כשהיה, he has not moved from his field: what he pays therefore buys nothing.
Hence the axiom: the siman grades not gravity but legibility. When the advantage can be read, it is forbidden; when a third party, a sale, or the very absence of a debt erases it, the prohibition falls with it.
The source, and how the Rambam names it:
| The clause | What it rules out | What remains |
|---|
| מי שהיתה שדה ממושכנת בידו לא יחזור וישכיר אותה לבעל השדה | Reading the rent as a price | The lessee is the debtor |
| משכנתא דסורא אם בא אחר ושכר אותה מהמלוה מותר לחזור ולהשכיר אותה לבעל השדה | A moral reading of the arrangement | What can no longer be proved is no longer forbidden |
| מותר למכור שדהו לאחד ולהתנות עמו שיחכירנו | Reading by intention alone | The body of the property changed hands |
| הלוהו על שדהו וא״ל אם לא תתן לי מכאן ועד ג׳ שנים הרי הוא שלי ולא אמר מעכשיו | Reading the clause as effective | אסמכתא: nothing was acquired |
💡 The marker: the word of the siman is not שכירות but מוכחא מילתא.
2. The 3 reflex questions
1. Is there an outstanding debt? If the property was sold (seif 3), no. If the משכנתא is of Sura, the Taz says it no longer bears the name of a loan. Otherwise, yes.
▼
2. Who pays, and to whom? If the one paying the rent is the borrower himself, the advantage is legible. An interposed third party makes it illegible — and seif 2 draws the consequence only in a משכנתא דסורא.
▼
3. Was title acquired? A pledge does not acquire — אימת קנאה. An “if you do not pay” clause does not acquire either — כל דאי לא קני. Only a sale completed by a קנין גמור acquires.
3. Master table — the four seifim clause by clause
| Clause of the seif | Who speaks | What results |
|---|
| מי שהיתה שדה ממושכנת בידו לא יחזור וישכיר אותה לבעל השדה | Mehaber | The basic prohibition: the lease returned to the debtor |
| ויש מי שמתיר לעשות כן במשכנתא דסורא | Mehaber | A lone view — and the Beit Yosef does not rely on it |
| ובלבד שלא התנה מתחילה על כך | Gloss | Nothing stipulated at the time of the loan |
| וגם שכבר החזיק המלוה בשדה אבל בלאו הכי לכולי עלמא אסור | Gloss | A real possession, failing which forbidden according to all |
| משכנתא דסורא אם בא אחר ושכר אותה מהמלוה מותר לחזור ולהשכיר אותה לבעל השדה | Mehaber | The interposed third party — in a משכנתא דסורא |
| מותר למכור שדהו לאחד ולהתנות עמו שיחכירנו | Mehaber | The sale permits, and stipulating the lease spoils nothing |
| הלוהו על שדהו וא״ל אם לא תתן לי מכאן ועד ג׳ שנים הרי הוא שלי ולא אמר מעכשיו | Mehaber | אסמכתא: without מעכשיו, nothing is acquired |
| בענין שאין המקח קיים תוך ג׳ שנים לא יאכל הפירות ואם אכלם הוי רבית קצוצה ויוצאת בדיינים | Mehaber | Fixed interest, recoverable in court |
| ויש אומרים דמה שאכל תוך ג׳ שנים לא הוי אלא אבק רבית דהוי כמשכנתא בלא נכייתא | Gloss | Dust of interest only, within the three years |
| אבל מה שאכל לאחר שלש שנים צריך להחזיר וכן עיקר | Gloss | After three years he returns — and that is the main ruling |
4. The pledge and the lease: what forbids and what permits
| Situation | Verdict | Source |
|---|
| Pledge, then lease to the borrower | Forbidden | שו״ע יו״ד קס״ד:א |
| The same, the deed attesting a long holding | Forbidden | ש״ך יו״ד קס״ד ס״ק א · טור יו״ד קס״ד |
| The same, with no taking of possession at all | Forbidden according to all | רמ״א יו״ד קס״ד:א · ט״ז יו״ד קס״ד ס״ק א |
| The same, the lease stipulated from the loan | Forbidden | רמ״א יו״ד קס״ד:א |
| משכנתא דסורא, lease to the borrower | One view permits; the Beit Yosef does not | שו״ע יו״ד קס״ד:א · בית יוסף יו״ד קס״ד |
| משכנתא דסורא, after a third party leased | Permitted | שו״ע יו״ד קס״ד:ב |
| Ordinary pledge, after a third party leased | Rashba’s disciples: permitted · Darkhei Moshe: forbidden | ט״ז יו״ד קס״ד ס״ק ב · באר היטב יו״ד קס״ד ס״ק ב |
| Complete sale, then lease to the seller | Permitted | שו״ע יו״ד קס״ד:ג · בית יוסף יו״ד קס״ד |
| The same sale without a קנין גמור | Forbidden — it is a loan | ט״ז יו״ד קס״ד ס״ק ה |
Do not confuse the gloss’s two conditions. “Not having stipulated” is a condition of intention; “having already taken possession” is a condition of fact, and it is the only one of which the gloss says לכולי עלמא אסור. Without possession there is no pledge at all.
5. רבית קצוצה or הערמת רבית: Rashi against the Rambam
| Position | Qualification | Consequence |
|---|
| רש״י | רבית קצוצה | Recoverable in court; the intention is read retroactively |
| רמב״ם · רמב״ן · רשב״א | הערמת רבית | Rabbinically forbidden; nothing is restored |
| The Mehaber, per the Shakh | כרש״י | Hence the place of the third-party permission, at seif 2 only |
6. משכנתא דסורא: the name changes, the halakha stays cautious
What to retain
The Taz explains why one view permits: in a pledge of Sura the field goes out at the term without payment, hence there is no debt, hence no lender taking a surplus. But the Beit Yosef declines to rely on that view — not by refuting it but by abstaining: כיון שגדולים אוסרים אין להקל.
7. The sale of seif 3 and its hidden condition
The trap of seif 3. The text permits stipulating a lease at the time of the sale — which the gloss on seif 1 forbade. The difference lies not in the stipulation but in what was transferred: a קנין גמור passes the body of the property. Without it the price becomes a loan again, and one falls back entirely under seif 1.
8. אסמכתא: the clause that does not work, and the fruits
| Period | Mehaber (Rif, Rambam) | Gloss (Rosh, Tur, Rashi, Tosafot) | The ground |
|---|
| Within the three years | Fixed interest — he returns | Dust of interest — he does not return | He could still repay |
| After the three years | He returns | He returns — וכן עיקר | מחילה בטעות |
💡 The three-year break does not come from ribbit. It comes from מחילה: what changes at the term is not the nature of the gain but the reason why the owner kept silent.
9. The vocabulary of the siman
| Term | What it denotes | Where it counts here |
|---|
| משכנתא | The pledge of land — enjoyment, not ownership | The subject of seif 1 |
| משכנתא דסורא | The pledge that goes out without payment at the term | Seifim 1 and 2; Taz ס״ק ג |
| נכייתא | The yearly deduction from the debt | The gloss’s term of comparison at seif 4 |
| חכירות | The fixed-rent lease, whether the field yields or not | Defined by the Shulhan Arukh at seif 3 |
| חכירי נרשאי | The arrangement: pledge, then lease back | The talmudic name of seif 1 |
| אסמכתא | A commitment made on an “if”, which does not acquire | The mainspring of seif 4 |
| מעכשיו | The word that saves the acquisition | Its absence is noted by seif 4 |
| הערמת רבית | Circumvention: each piece lawful, the assembly not | The Rambam’s qualification at seif 1 |
| רבית קצוצה | Stipulated interest — recoverable in court | Rashi at seif 1; the Mehaber at seif 4 |
| אבק רבית | Rabbinically forbidden — not recoverable | The gloss at seif 4 |
| מחילה בטעות | The sufferance of one who believed himself dispossessed | What makes the post-three-year fruits returnable |
10. Golden rules, mnemonic, pitfalls and a flash card
The 5 golden rules
- A pledge does not acquire. אימת קנאה — the gemara’s question holds for every variant of the arrangement.
- A clause in a deed does not manufacture a fact, and a true fact would not suffice either: the Shakh writes ואפילו האמת נמי הכי.
- The interposed third party erases a proof; he does not cure a fault. Hence the limited reach of seif 2.
- A sale permits what a pledge forbids — provided it is a sale: קנין גמור.
- Silence is not a waiver when it rests on an error: מחילה בטעות.
Mnemonic — the word משכן
מ — מוכחא מילתא : what the thing shows decides
ש — שכירות ולא הלואה : the משכנתא דסורא, the only one whose name changes
כ — קנין גמור : what makes a sale a sale
ן — אין המקח קיים : the “if” clause acquires nothing
The 4 classic pitfalls
- Thinking the amount of the rent is at issue. It never is: the question is whether the lender had title.
- Reading seif 2 as an extension of seif 1. The Taz shows it permits less, not more — and the Shakh draws the Mehaber’s position from it.
- Taking seif 3 for a general permission. Without a קנין גמור there is no sale, and one is at seif 1.
- Thinking the field becomes the lender’s after three years. It never does: אסמכתא לא קניא. Only the question of the fruits remains open.
| Seif | In one line |
|---|
| 1 | A lender holding a field in pledge does not lease it back to its owner; one view permits in a משכנתא דסורא, and the gloss requires that nothing was stipulated and that possession was already taken. |
| 2 | In a משכנתא דסורא, if a third party rented the field from the lender, he may then rent it to the owner. |
| 3 | It is permitted to sell one’s field and stipulate that it will be leased back — the sale must be a קנין גמור. |
| 4 | A field promised “mine in three years” is not acquired; the fruits eaten are fixed interest for the Mehaber, dust of interest for the gloss while the three years run, and those after are returned according to all. |
Flash card. אימת קנאה → חכירי נרשאי → הערמת רבית → משכנתא דסורא → אפסקיה אחר → קנין גמור → אסמכתא לא קניא → הדרא ארעא והדרי פירי → מחילה בטעות.
🎓 Recap of the study path