דעת DAAT
← Siman ק״כ Home ♥ Support
Home Yoreh De'ah · Tevilat kelim — immersing vessels acquired from a non-Jew Siman ק״כ Level 3 — Synthesis / Review
✦ ❖ ✦ D A A T · L E V E L 3 — S Y N T H E S I S / R E V I E W ✦ ❖ ✦

Siman 120 — Tevilat kelim — immersing vessels acquired from a non-Jew

דיני טבילת הכלים

Which vessels require tevila and which are exempt, with or without a berakha: materials, use, mode of acquisition, the mikveh of forty se'ah and what makes an immersion valid
Structured review, psak tables, fast memorization


Source: Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah ק״כ — 16 seifim
Nossei kelim: ש״ך (Shach) · ט״ז (Taz) · באר הגולה · ביאור הגר״א · פתחי תשובה (Pitchei Teshuva)
Compiled by: הרב יוסף חיים סממה · DAAT
For students who have mastered Levels 1 and 2
daattorah.com

📑 Plan of the synthesis

  1. The axiom: where tevila comes from and what it applies to
  2. The 3 reflex questions: material · use · mode of acquisition
  3. Master grid A — the materials (seifim 1, 6, 7)
  4. Master grid B — the use: כלי סעודה or not (seifim 4, 5, 7)
  5. Master grid C — the mode of acquisition (seifim 8-11, 16)
  6. The mikveh, the berakha and a valid immersion (seifim 1-3, 12-15)
  7. The 6 golden rules
  8. Mnemonic — the memory aid « טבילה »
  9. The 5 classic pitfalls
  10. Recap of the 16 seifim — one line each
  11. Final flash card

1. The axiom: where tevila comes from and what it applies to

The starting point:

Siman 120 deals neither with absorbed taste nor with kashering — that is Siman 121. It deals with a change of ownership: a meal vessel that passes from a non-Jew's hand into a Jew's must be immersed in a mikveh before being used, even if it is brand new and has never served. The mishna in Avodah Zarah teaches « הַלּוֹקֵחַ כְּלֵי תַּשְׁמִישׁ מִן הַגּוֹיִם », and the gemara adds three restrictions that govern the whole siman: tevila applies only to meal vessels — « כְּלֵי סְעוּדָה אֲמוּרִין בַּפָּרָשָׁה » —, only to metal — « כְּלֵי מַתָּכוֹת אֲמוּרִין בַּפָּרָשָׁה » —, and only to what is acquired — « לֹא שָׁנוּ אֶלָּא בִּלְקוּחִין… אֲבָל שְׁאוּלִין » (עבודה זרה ע״ה ע״ב).
The verseWhat the gemara derivesThe consequence in the siman
« כָּל דָּבָר אֲשֶׁר יָבֹא בָאֵשׁ תַּעֲבִירוּ בָאֵשׁ וְטָהֵר » (במדבר ל״א כ״ג)Scripture added a further purification beyond kashering: one by waterImmersion in a mikveh, on top of kashering
« בְּמֵי נִדָּה » in the same verseThe water in which a nidda immerses, that is forty se'ahA mikveh or spring of ארבעים סאה (seif 1)
« אֲפִילּוּ כֵּלִים חֲדָשִׁים בַּמַּשְׁמָע »New vessels are included: tevila does not depend on absorbed tasteאף על פי שהם חדשים — seif 1
💡 The landmark: do not confuse הגעלה / ליבון (expelling a forbidden taste — Siman 121) with טבילה (moving the vessel out of the non-Jew's ownership into Israel's). The Taz gives the reason for tevila: summary — that the vessel leave the non-Jew's impurity for the holiness of Israel (ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק א). That is why a new vessel is included and why a borrowed one is not: everything turns on whose vessel it is.

⚖ A foundational machloket: Torah law or rabbinic?

The Rambam writes that this immersion of meal vessels bought from a non-Jew is not a matter of ritual purity at all and is מדברי סופרים, the verse serving only as a רמז (רמב״ם הלכות מאכלות אסורות פרק י״ז הלכה ה). The Taz, by contrast, writes explicitly that טבילת כלים דאורייתא, and from that he derives that a minor is not believed about the immersion (ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ט״ז). Note the practical difference: the more one holds tevila to be Torah law, the less one relies on a doubt — hence the Shach's constant reflex in every uncertain case: immerse without a berakha, or immerse the doubtful vessel together with one that is certainly obligated.

2. The 3 reflex questions

■ 1. WHAT IS IT MADE OF? (מתכות / זכוכית / עץ) — metal and glass: tevila with a berakha; vessels coated with lead (המצופים באבר) on the inside: tevila, but the Rama rules without a berakha, « וכן נוהגין »; bare wood, stone and earthenware: nothing at all (seifim 1, 6, 7).
↓ if the material obligates, what is it used for?
■ 2. WHAT IS IT USED FOR? (כלי סעודה or not) — is the food itself placed on it or eaten from it as it is? The grill on which the food itself is laid: yes; the trivet that only holds the pot: no; the shechita knife and the matza irons, which serve at a stage when the food is not yet edible: no (seifim 4, 5).
↓ if it is indeed a meal vessel, how did it reach you?
■ 3. HOW DID YOU ACQUIRE IT? (לקוחין or not) — bought from a non-Jew: tevila. Borrowed or rented: nothing. Pledged with you, seized by an official, bought back after a sale, made by a non-Jewish craftsman: this is where the whole middle of the siman is decided (seifim 8-11).

3. Master grid A — the materials

Based on the Mehaber and Rama in seif 1, together with seifim 6 and 7 on composite vessels, with the Shach and the Taz.

VesselTevila?Berakha?Source
Meal vessel of metal (מתכות), even brand new 🔴 Yes Yes שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:א
Meal vessel of glass (זכוכית) 🔴 Yes Yes שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:א ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק א
Vessel coated with lead on the inside (המצופים באבר מבפנים) 🟡 Yes The Rama: י״א without a berakha, « וכן נוהגין » שו״ע ורמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:א ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ג
Vessel coated with glass (enamelled) 🟡 Like the lead-coated The same ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ב, in the name of או״ה כלל נ״ח
Bare wood, stone, earthenware 🟢 No רמב״ם הלכות מאכלות אסורות פרק י״ז הלכה ו
Wooden vessel with iron hoops on the outside (חשוקים) 🟢 No שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ו ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ב raises a צ״ע
Silver cup set into a wooden vessel 🔴 Yes Yes, according to the Shach שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ז ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ג
Vessel essentially of wood with a little iron fixed in it, usable without it 🟢 No רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ז
Vessel mounted on inner iron pegs, unusable without them 🔴 Yes Yes רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ז
📌 Key reading: for a composite vessel the question is never “is there metal in it?” but « עיקר הכלי » — what is the substance of the vessel. A wooden barrel bound with iron hoops remains a wooden vessel; a silver cup set in a wooden mount remains a silver cup. The Rama's working test: summary — could it be used without the metal part? If so, it is wood; if not, and the metal is on the inside, it is a metal vessel (רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ז).

4. Master grid B — the use: כלי סעודה or not

The gemara's criterion — « כְּלֵי סְעוּדָה אֲמוּרִין בַּפָּרָשָׁה » — is cashed out in concrete cases in seifim 4, 5 and 7.

VesselTevila?The criterionSource
Trivets (טריפיד״ש) on which pots are set 🟢 No The food never touches them שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ד
Grills (פדיליא״ש) on which the food is laid 🔴 Yes The food itself is put on them שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ד ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ט
Shechita knife, and a skinning knife 🟡 יש מי שאומר: no At that stage the animal is not yet edible; the Rama: יש חולקין, it is good to immerse it without a berakha שו״ע ורמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ה ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ז
Matza irons 🟢 No The dough still needs baking רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ה ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״א
The cover placed over the bread to bake it 🟢 No The same reason רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ה
A pot lid 🔴 Yes It is part of the meal vessel itself רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ה, in the name of הגהות אשיר״י
Pepper mill with a fixed iron shaft in a wooden body 🔴 Yes The iron is fixed and it is what grinds רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ז ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ד: the lower receptacle, being all wood, is exempt
Funnels and taps of iron or another metal 🔴 Yes The whole vessel is metal רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ז ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ט״ו: a wooden funnel with an iron spout is exempt

5. Master grid C — the mode of acquisition

The heart of the siman: four seifim (8 to 11) and seif 16 unfold a single question — is the vessel לקוח, that is, has it truly passed into a Jew's ownership?

CaseTevila?The decisive detailSource
Purchase from a non-Jew 🔴 Yes, with a berakha The base case of seif 1 שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:א
Borrowing (שואל) or renting (שוכר) from a non-Jew 🟢 No It is not לקוח: it is still his שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ח
Bought by one Jew, then lent to another Jew 🔴 Yes summary — the obligation already arose in the first one's hand שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ח
The first buyer did not take it for meal use (to cut parchments) 🟡 יש מי שאומר: the second need not immerse it But the first may not use it for meal purposes, even occasionally, without tevila (Rama) שו״ע ורמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ח ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ז
A second Jew buys it from him for meal use 🔴 Yes The obligation falls on the second רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ח ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ח
A non-Jew pledges a vessel with a Jew and means to leave it there 🔴 Yes His intent to forfeit it counts as a sale שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ט
The same pledge, intent unknown 🟡 Immerse without a berakha Or buy another vessel and immerse them together שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ט ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ט
The pledge is finally forfeited to him 🟡 Immerse again without a berakha The Rama, in the name of a responsum of the מהרי״ל רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ט ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק כ׳
A Jew gives his own silver to a non-Jewish craftsman to make him a vessel 🟡 Mehaber: no — Rama: יש חולקין, immerse without a berakha The question is whether we follow the material or the maker שו״ע ורמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:י ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ב
Part of the metal belongs to the non-Jew 🔴 Yes The Rama; and the Shach: with a berakha רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:י ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק כ״ב
A Jewish craftsman made the vessel for a non-Jew, then bought it back 🟡 Without a berakha if all the metal was the non-Jew's If he made it for himself, or supplied part of the metal: nothing רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:י ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק כ״ג, כ״ד
A Jew sells to a non-Jew and then buys it back 🔴 Yes It is a genuine purchase from a non-Jew שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:י״א
A Jew had only pledged it with the non-Jew and redeemed it 🟢 No It never left his ownership שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:י״א ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ד
A vessel bought in partnership by a Jew and a non-Jew 🟢 No It remains partly the non-Jew's רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:י״א ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק כ״ו
Vessels stolen from a Jew and returned 🟢 No A thief cannot display them: they never bore his name רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:י״א ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ט״ו
Vessels seized by an officer or a ruler and returned 🔴 Yes They had already been נשתקעו in his hand רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:י״א ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק כ״ז
One forgot to immerse before Shabbat or Yom Tov 🟡 Give it as a gift to a non-Jew, then borrow it back The Taz: a temporary expedient only שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ט״ז ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ח
📌 Key reading: this whole grid reduces to one pivot — לקוחין against שאולין. Every case asks only: has the vessel truly become the Jew's? A pledge is doubtful because its ownership is doubtful; partnership does not exempt because the non-Jew keeps a share; theft does not obligate because the thief could never call himself the owner; seizure does obligate because the authority genuinely made it his own.

6. The mikveh, the berakha and a valid immersion

The place and the measure

A mikveh or spring of forty se'ah (seif 1) — the gemara derives it from the words « בְּמֵי נִדָּה » and teaches « וְכוּלָּן צְרִיכִין טְבִילָה בְּאַרְבָּעִים סְאָה » (עבודה זרה ע״ה ע״ב). The Taz discusses the question of the spring and of the required measure (ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ב).

The berakha

CaseWordingSource
A single vesselעל טבילת כלישו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ג
Two vessels or moreעל טבילת כליםשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ג
According to other poskimעל טבילת כלי מתכותש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ח, in the name of the ב״ח and או״ה — the Taz questions this (ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ה)
Doubtful cases (coated vessel, shechita knife, pledge, craftsman)Without a berakha — or together with a vessel that is certainly obligatedש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ה

What invalidates or hinders the immersion

PointThe ruleSource
Holding the vesselIt must be רפוי בידו — loose in the hand. Gripped tightly, that is a חציצה. If one first wet one's hand, there is no concernשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ב
With what water to wet the handThe Rama: only with mikveh water, not with drawn water (מים תלושים)רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ב ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ד ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ז
The handlesOne must immerse ידי הכלי — the handles and gripsשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:י״ב
RustRemove the חלודה beforehand. If not removed: if one is particular about it, it interposes; a residue that cannot be removed is מיעוטו שאינו מקפיד and does not interposeשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:י״ג, which refers to the laws of חציצה in Siman 202
A minorHe is not believed about the immersion; but if he immersed in front of an adult, the immersion counts (Rama)שו״ע ורמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:י״ד ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ט״ז
A non-JewIf he immersed the vessels, the immersion counts; but he is not believed that he did it (Rama)שו״ע ורמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ט״ו ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ז ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק כ״ח
💡 Worth noting: the Shach raises a צ״ע on seif 2 — the Rambam writes that one who holds vessels and immerses them leaves them impure even if he loosened his grip, גזירה שמא לא ירפה, and permits only where one first rinsed one's hands in the water (רמב״ם הלכות מקואות פרק ב׳ הלכה י״א ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ו). Hence the widespread practice of laying the vessel in a perforated basket rather than holding it.

7. The 6 golden rules

  1. Metal and glass, even brand new, require tevila. Newness is no exemption: tevila is not a kashering (שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:א).
  2. Meal vessels only. Whatever serves at a stage when the food is not yet edible — the shechita knife, the matza irons — is exempt (שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ד-ה).
  3. Borrowed or rented: nothing. Only what is acquired obligates — the gemara's « לֹא שָׁנוּ אֶלָּא בִּלְקוּחִין » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ח).
  4. In a composite, follow the עיקר. Usable without the metal → a wooden vessel; unusable without it and the metal is inside → a metal vessel (רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ז).
  5. In doubt: immerse without a berakha, or immerse the doubtful vessel together with one certainly obligated — the Shach's constant reflex (ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ה ; ס״ק ט״ז).
  6. Forgotten before Shabbat: gift it to a non-Jew, then borrow it. The Taz limits the expedient to that Shabbat, or to a time when one has no mikveh (שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ט״ז ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ח).

8. Mnemonic — the memory aid « טבילה »

ט-ב-י-ל-ה — the five letters of the word טבילה
The ladder of acquisition — from the most obligated to the most exempt

9. The 5 classic pitfalls

❌ Pitfall 1 — Confusing tevila with kashering: a brand-new vessel, never used and holding nothing, still requires tevila — « אֲפִילּוּ כֵּלִים חֲדָשִׁים בַּמַּשְׁמָע » (עבודה זרה ע״ה ע״ב). Conversely, tevila never replaces the הגעלה of a vessel used with forbidden food: that is Siman 121, and the order is first kasher, then immerse.
❌ Pitfall 2 — Thinking every metal object is included: the gemara restricts twice — « כְּלֵי סְעוּדָה אֲמוּרִין בַּפָּרָשָׁה » and « כְּלֵי מַתָּכוֹת אֲמוּרִין בַּפָּרָשָׁה ». A trivet that only holds the pot, the shechita knife and the matza irons are not meal vessels and require nothing — even if they are solid steel (שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ד-ה).
❌ Pitfall 3 — Immersing the vessel while gripping it tightly: gripped, that is a חציצה and the immersion is worthless. It must be held רפוי, or one must have wet one's hand first — and the Rama specifies: in mikveh water, not in drawn water (שו״ע ורמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ב). Another common omission: the handles and grips, which must be immersed too (שו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:י״ב).
❌ Pitfall 4 — Taking a pledge for a purchase, or a purchase for a pledge: the siman's two pledges run in opposite directions. A non-Jew who pledges with a Jew: if it is clear he means to forfeit it → tevila; otherwise → without a berakha (seif 9). A Jew who pledges with a non-Jew and redeems it: no tevila at all, the vessel never ceased to be his (seif 11). Nor should this be confused with a sale followed by a repurchase, which does obligate.
❌ Pitfall 5 — Making the gift to a non-Jew a permanent solution: the expedient of seif 16 — giving the vessel to a non-Jew and then borrowing it back — is, according to the Taz, only a stopgap: for that Shabbat, or as long as one has no mikveh. Afterwards, the vessel remaining permanently with the Jew, it becomes לקוח again and requires tevila (ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ח). And if one transgressed and used the vessel without tevila, what was prepared in it is not forbidden — one immerses it afterwards (רמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ט״ז).

For halacha le-ma'aseh, consult your Rav.

10. Recap of the 16 seifim — one line each

SeifTopicThe essentials
1What requires tevilaOne who buys from a non-Jew meal vessels of metal, or of glass, or vessels coated with lead on the inside — even though they are new, must immerse them in a mikveh or a spring of forty se'ah. Rama: י״א that lead-coated vessels, even on the inside, are immersed without a berakha, and such is the custom.
2Holding the vessel — חציצהThe vessel must be loose in the hand at the moment of immersion; gripped, that is an interposition. If one wet one's hand with water beforehand, there is no concern. Rama: provided one wet one's hands in mikveh water, not in drawn water.
3The wording of the berakhaOne blesses על טבילת כלי; and if there are two or more, על טבילת כלים.
4Trivets and grillsTrivets (טריפיד״ש) on which pots are set do not require immersion; grills (פדיליא״ש) do, because the food itself is placed on them.
5Shechita knife, matza irons, coversA shechita knife (and a skinning knife): יש מי שאומר that it needs no immersion. Rama: יש חולקין (תשב״ץ), and it is good to immerse it without a berakha; the irons used to prepare matzot need no immersion, nor does the cover laid over the bread to bake it — but a pot lid does require immersion.
6Wood with iron hoopsA wooden vessel with iron hoops on the outside that hold it together does not require immersion.
7Composite vesselsA silver cup joined to a wooden vessel requires immersion. Rama: so too a pepper mill with a fixed iron shaft inside the wood, and iron funnels and taps and those of other metals. But only where the essence of the vessel is metal; if its essence is wood with only a little iron fixed in it, and it can be used without the iron — nothing; and a vessel mounted on inner iron pegs, without which it could not be used — immersion.
8Borrowing, renting, lending between JewsOne who borrows or rents a vessel from a non-Jew need not immerse it; but if a Jew bought it from the non-Jew and lent it to his fellow, it requires immersion, since the obligation already arose in the first one's hand. יש מי שאומר: if the first did not take it for meal use but to cut parchments and the like, it need not be immersed. Rama: yet the first may not use it for meal purposes, even occasionally, without immersion; and if a second Jew buys it from the first for meal use, the obligation falls on the second.
9A non-Jew's pledgeA non-Jew who pledges a vessel with a Jew: if it is apparent that he means to leave it (לשקעו) in his hand, it requires immersion; if not, he immerses it without a berakha, or buys another vessel and immerses it together with it. Rama: and if in the end it is forfeited to him, he immerses it again without a berakha.
10The craftsmanA Jew who gave silver to a non-Jewish craftsman to make him a vessel from it need not immerse it. Rama: יש חולקין, and one should immerse it without a berakha; and if part of the silver from which the vessel was made was the non-Jew's, it requires immersion. Likewise a Jewish craftsman who made a vessel for a non-Jew and bought it from him immerses it too without a berakha if the non-Jew supplied all the metal; but if he made it for himself and only bought the metal from the non-Jew, or supplied part of the metal himself, it needs no immersion.
11Sale, reverse pledge, partnership, theftA Jew who sold a vessel to a non-Jew and bought it back from him must immerse it; but if he had pledged it with him and redeemed it, he need not. Rama: a Jew and a non-Jew who bought a vessel in partnership — no immersion; a Jew whose vessels were stolen or robbed from him and returned — no immersion; but an officer or a ruler who coerced a Jew and took his vessels, and they were returned to him — they require immersion, since they had already been נשתקעו in the non-Jew's hand.
12The handlesOne must immerse the handles of the vessel (ידי הכלי).
13Rust and חציצהOne must remove the rust before immersion; if one did not remove it: if one is particular about it, it interposes; if one scrubbed it and put it in coals and a little rust still remains which cannot be removed that way, it is a מיעוטו שאינו מקפיד and does not interpose. An explicit cross-reference to the laws of חציצה in Siman 202.
14A minor's testimonyA minor is not believed about the immersion of vessels. Rama: but if he immersed them in front of an adult, the immersion counts (ת״ה סימן רנ״ז).
15Immersion performed by a non-JewIf one had the vessels immersed by a non-Jew, the immersion counts for them. Rama: but he is not believed that he performed it.
16Forgotten before ShabbatIf one forgot and did not immerse a vessel before Shabbat or before Yom Tov, he gives it as a gift to a non-Jew and afterwards borrows it from him, and it is permitted to use it. Rama: one may do the same on a weekday too, in a place where one has no mikveh; and if one transgressed and used the vessel without immersion, what was prepared in it did not become forbidden — one immerses it afterwards.

11. Final flash card

QuestionReflex answerSource
A brand-new steel pot bought from a non-Jew?Tevila with a berakha, new though it isשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:א
A glass bought from a non-Jew?Tevila: glass is like metalשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:א ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק א
A lead-coated or enamelled vessel?Tevila, but without a berakha according to the Ramaרמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:א ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק ב
A wooden vessel bound with iron hoops?Nothing: we follow the עיקר, which is the woodשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ו
A shechita knife?יש מי שאומר: nothing; the Rama: without a berakhaשו״ע ורמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:ה
A vessel borrowed or rented from a non-Jew?No tevila at all: it is not לקוחשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ח
A vessel pledged with me by a non-Jew?According to his intent: tevila, or tevila without a berakhaשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ט
A vessel bought jointly with a non-Jew?Nothing, as long as his share remainsרמ״א יו״ד ק״כ:י״א
How much water, and how to hold it?Forty se'ah, and the vessel loose in the handשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:א-ב
Forgotten before Shabbat?Gift to a non-Jew, then borrow it back — but only temporarilyשו״ע יו״ד ק״כ:ט״ז ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״כ ס״ק י״ח

⚖ The reflex in 3 questions

  1. Material? Metal and glass → tevila with a berakha; lead-coated or enamelled → without a berakha; wood, stone, earthenware → nothing. In a composite, follow the עיקר.
  2. Use? A meal vessel → tevila; whatever serves at a stage when the food is not yet edible → nothing.
  3. Acquisition? Bought → tevila; borrowed, rented, in partnership, stolen and returned → nothing; pledge and craftsman → according to the intent and to who owns the metal, usually without a berakha.
For halacha le-ma'aseh, consult your Rav.

🎓 Recap of the study path

LevelContentAcquired
🌱 Level 1 — Base Text of the 16 seifim, translation, clear tables Overall understanding
Level 2 — Lamdan The reason for tevila, Torah law or rabbinic, the hakira about the עיקר of a composite vessel, the status of a משכון and the question of the אומן In-depth study
Level 3 — Synthesis Three master grids, golden rules, mnemonic, pitfalls, recap of the seifim Practical mastery + review
📜 Level 4 — Halacha le-ma'aseh New tableware from the shop, electrical appliances, disposable vessels, immersing while travelling Contemporary application
💡 Suggested next steps:
📖 Sources of this siman on Sefaria:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
DAAT · הרב יוסף חיים סממה
תלמיד חכם · מעביר שיעורים בהלכה ובחסידות
סימן ק״כ · Level 3 — Synthesis / Review · דיני טבילת הכלים
daattorah.com

DAAT דעת — © 5786 / 2026 · Back to home · Siman ק״כ · ♥ Support

📖Join the khavroutha