✦ ❖ ✦
DAAT · LEVEL 1 — INTRODUCTION

Siman רע"ח · 1 Seif

Permission to extinguish the light for a cholé — to discover and understand
סימן רע"ח
שֶׁיָּכוֹל לְכַבּוֹת הַנֵּר בִּשְׁבִיל הַחוֹלֶה
🌱 Introductory Level · מתחילים
✦ ❖ ✦

First approach to Siman רע"ח: complete Hebrew text of the Mechaber, fluent English translation, pedagogical explanations of the halachic concepts, modern practical cases and synthesis.

Subject: Permission to extinguish the light for a cholé
Source: שולחן ערוך אורח חיים סימן רע"ח (1 seif)

Compilation: רב יוסף חיים סממה
DAAT · daattorah.com

📑 Outline of the study

1. The text of the Shulchan Aruch — the 1 seif of the Mechaber
2. The general context: why this siman, what is the question?
3. The key halachic concepts of this siman
4. The seif analyzed — point by point
5. The Mishnah Berurah — first entries
6. The position of the Rema — Ashkenazi vs Sephardi differences
7. Modern practical cases
8. Practical synthesis and rules to remember
9. Comprehension questions

1. The text of the Shulchan Aruch

Siman רע"ח contains 1 seif of the Mechaber (Rabbi Yosef Karo) which codifies the rules regarding permission to extinguish the light for a cholé.

Seif א — Extinguishing to allow sleep for a cholé in mortal danger

שֶׁיָּכוֹל לְכַבּוֹת הַנֵּר בִּשְׁבִיל הַחוֹלֶה. ובו סעיף אחד:
מֻתָּר לְכַבּוֹת הַנֵּר בִּשְׁבִיל שֶׁיִּישַׁן הַחוֹלֶה שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ סַכָּנָה.
Translation: it is permitted to extinguish the light on Shabbos in order to allow a sick person in mortal danger (חוֹלֶה שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ סַכָּנָה) to sleep. Principle: pikuach nefesh (preservation of life) overrides Shabbos. Even the de'oraita melachah of מכבה (extinguishing) — a major prohibition — is set aside to preserve life. Important note: Siman 278 codifies a specific case but stems from a general principle (its sequence: 328 onwards for the cholé on Shabbos).
Overview: this very short siman (only 1 seif) codifies a practical application of the principle פיקוח נפש דוחה שבת. The cholé in mortal danger needs sleep — and the light prevents him → extinguishing it is not only permitted, but obligatory in a real case.

2. The general context

Pikuach nefesh and Shabbos

Siman 278 is the emblematic application of the fundamental halachic principle: פִּקּוּחַ נֶפֶשׁ דּוֹחֶה שַׁבָּת ("preservation of life overrides Shabbos"). Talmudic source: Yoma 85a ("הַחֲיוֹתָם תַּחְיוּ — אַתָּה מְחַלֵּל עָלָיו שַׁבָּת אַחַת..."), with the rule of Chazal: to preserve a life, one does not wait, one acts immediately.

Extinguishing the light to allow sleep is only one example. The scope of the siman is vast: any act (de'oraita or de'rabanan) necessary for the healing/preservation of a cholé in danger is permitted.

The fundamental question of the siman: can one perform the de'oraita melachah of מכבה for a purpose that is not materially vital (the cholé can technically live without sleeping for a while) — but which is therapeutically important (sleep aids healing)?

Answer: yes — because night/sleep is an integral part of the healing process. Anything that contributes to the survival of the cholé in danger is permitted.

Place in Hilchos Shabbos

Siman רע"ח is a very brief siman that serves as a hinge in the "candles" sequence. It follows siman 277 (not to cause extinguishing) and precedes 279 (muktzeh handling). It forms a "candle-extinction" trio: forbidden as a general rule (siman 277), permitted for the cholé in danger (siman 278), forbidden for mere handling (siman 279).

3. The key halachic concepts

Concept 1 — פִּקּוּחַ נֶפֶשׁ (Pikuach Nefesh): "preservation of life". Major halachic principle — nearly all prohibitions are set aside to preserve a Jewish life. Sources: Yoma 85a, Sanhedrin 74a. Limits: three prohibitions never set aside — idolatry, murder, forbidden relations (= "יהרג ואל יעבור").
Concept 2 — חוֹלֶה שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ סַכָּנָה (cholé in mortal danger): major category of the cholé. Definition: any sick person where "אומדן הלב אומר שיש סכנה" (medical assessment indicates danger). Includes: high fever, severe pain, internal injury, etc. The criterion is halachic-practical, not only strictly medical.
Concept 3 — חוֹלֶה שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ סַכָּנָה (cholé without danger): distinct category. For this cholé, only derabanan melachos or via a non-Jew are permitted. The de'oraita melachah (like מכבה) is set aside only in a case of sakanah.
Concept 4 — Sleep as therapy: the seif validates that helping a cholé sleep is considered part of the preservation process. Sleep need not "cure in itself" — it suffices that it is recognized as therapeutic.

4. The seif analyzed

ElementReadingApplication
"מותר לכבות"Permitted (active) — not merely toleratedOne may/must actively extinguish
"בשביל שיישן"To facilitate sleepNot just for comfort — for healing
"החולה שיש בו סכנה"Cholé in mortal danger specificallyRestricted category. Not for a mild cholé.
3 questions to ask yourself:
  1. Is the cholé truly in danger in the halachic sense? If yes → permitted.
  2. Does the light really prevent him from sleeping? If not, preferred alternative (cover the light, etc.).
  3. Is there a non-de'oraita alternative (non-Jew, derabanan melachah)? If so, prefer it.

5. The Mishnah Berurah

The Mishnah Berurah has only 3 entries on this short siman — proof of the clarity of the principle.

משנה ברורה (א) — החולה שיש בו סכנה: ופשוט הוא דלא רק מותר אלא חובה לכבות אם הוא צריך לישן באמת כי פיקוח נפש דוחה שבת.
Explanation: it is not merely "permitted" — it is obligatory (חובה) if the cholé truly needs it to sleep. Pikuach nefesh gives no choice — it obligates.
משנה ברורה (ב) — מותר: ואפילו אם אינו אומר שצריך לישן אלא אנו רואים שהשינה תעזור לו. ובלבד שלא יכול לפוס באמירה לעכו"ם בצורה מהירה.
Explanation: one can assess medically (אומדן) — no need for the cholé to ask explicitly. However, if one can accomplish the matter via a non-Jew just as fast — prefer the non-Jew (reduces the level of the prohibition transgressed).

For the complete 3 entries: Mishnah Berurah 278.

6. The position of the Rema

The Rema adds no הגהה on this siman — the principle is so clear and unanimous that there is no Mechaber/Rema divergence.

Rare case: on matters of pikuach nefesh, Sephardim and Ashkenazim share the same halachah (except secondary nuances on the level of "danger" required). It is the universality of the biblical principle.

7. Modern practical cases

SituationApplication
Patient on cardiac treatment unable to sleep due to hospital lightAsk a non-Jew (nurse) to extinguish. If impossible, extinguish oneself (pikuach nefesh).
Person suffering from high fever + need for sleepIf the fever makes the patient "חולה שיש בו סכנה" → extinguishing permitted.
Young child with respiratory illnessSmall sick child = "סכנה" (Mordechai on siman 276). Therefore extinguishing permitted for his sleep.
Ordinary Shabbos candle at home — fatigue of a healthy adultNo pikuach nefesh. Forbidden to extinguish (siman 277). Alternative: cover the candle.
Patient with severe migraine without mortal danger"חולה שאין בו סכנה" — non-Jew may extinguish, not the Jew himself (except borderline cases).
Doubt as to the severityבספק פיקוח נפש מקילים — in case of doubt, we lean toward permitting.

8. Practical synthesis of the siman

The 4 rules to remember from Siman רע"ח:
  1. Pikuach nefesh = basis of the siman. Extinguishing the light for the sleep of a cholé in danger: permitted and obligatory.
  2. Definition of "סכנה": practical assessment of danger, not necessarily immediate. Doubt = treat as danger.
  3. Preferred alternatives: non-Jew or derabanan melachah, if possible without delay.
  4. Limits: does not apply to mere comfort, to a cholé without sakanah, or to ordinary fatigue.

9. Comprehension questions

Check your understanding:
  1. What is the central halachic principle of Siman 278?
  2. What is the definition of "חוֹלֶה שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ סַכָּנָה"?
  3. Why does the MB specify that extinguishing is not only permitted but obligatory?
  4. What are the preferable alternatives if possible (non-Jew, handling)?
  5. Does the siman apply to a cholé without mortal danger?
  6. What does the MB say about medical assessment (אומדן) vs the patient's request?
  7. What is the rule "ספק פיקוח נפש" and its application to the siman?

To go further

If you want to deepen this siman:
Continue the study — next simanSiman 279 →
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
DAAT · רב יוסף חיים סממה

סימן רע"ח · Level 1 — Introduction
♥ Support DAAT
📖Join the chavrusa