Siman שנ"ט · 1 Seif
A first encounter with Siman שנ"ט: full Hebrew text of the Mechaber, clear English translation, halachic concept explanations, modern practical cases and synthesis.
Topic: Open space (rechava) behind houses
Source: Shulchan Aruch Orach Chayim siman 359 (1 seif)
Compilation: Rav Yossef Haim Samama
DAAT · daattorah.com
📑 Study Plan
1. The text of the Shulchan Aruch
Siman שנ"ט contains 1 seif of the Mechaber (Rabbi Yosef Karo) codifying the rules relating to the open space (rechava) behind houses.
Seif א
דין רחבה שאחורי הבתים. ובו סעיף אחד:
רחבה שאחורי הבתים יתירה על בית סאתים ולא הוקפה לדירה אין מטלטלין בה אלא בד' אמות ואם פתח לה פתח מביתו ואחר כך הקיפה אפילו אם יש גורן בינה לבית הוי היקף לדירה: הגה ומה שאין אנו נזהרין לטלטל בחצירות שאחורי הבתים משום דבזמן הזה סתמן מוקפין לדירה כמו שנתבאר לעיל גבי קרפף: (ד"ע)
- בֵּית סָאתַיִם — the area of the Mishkan courtyard (50 × 100 amos = 5000 amos²). Below — no problem; above — karpef status may apply.
- ד' אַמּוֹת — the carrying radius permitted in a non-true private domain.
- גֹּרֶן — a grain threshing floor; here, an example of agricultural use that could mislead one to think the doorway serves the field, not the dwelling.
2. General context
What is this siman about?
Siman שנ"ט addresses the rechava — the open space arranged behind houses. In the ancient city, an empty lot was left in front of the house (the chatzer, courtyard) and another behind (the rechava). The whole question is whether one can carry objects there on Shabbos.
Place in Hilchos Shabbos
Siman שנ"ט is the direct continuation of siman 358 (the karpef). Where 358 stated the general rule of karpef, siman 359 applies it to a concrete case: the space behind houses. The underlying debate stems from the sugya in Eruvin on the karpef and the chatzer.
3. Key halachic concepts
- הֻקַּף לְדִירָה — an enclosure "enclosed for dwelling": the fence was made to serve a place of dwelling. Such an enclosure is a true reshus hayachid regardless of size.
- לֹא הֻקַּף לְדִירָה — an enclosure walled in without intent to dwell (e.g., to keep cattle or wood). If exceeding beis sa'asayim, it becomes a karpef: only 4 amos.
- בֵּית סָאתַיִם — the threshold area (5000 amos²). Below, the enclosure remains reshus hayachid even without intent; above, karpef status may apply.
4. Detail of the seif
| Stage | Case | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Rule | Rechava behind the houses, area > beis sa'asayim, not enclosed for dwelling. | Karpef: carrying limited to 4 amos; forbidden to carry from the house into it. |
| Exception | Doorway opened from the house, then enclosed. | Hekkef le-dira: the doorway preceding the fence proves dwelling intent → free carrying. |
| Clarification | Between the house and the rechava there is a threshing floor (גֹּרֶן) — which could mislead one to think the doorway serves the field. | Irrelevant: the doorway retains its status as a "dwelling entrance"; the space remains mukaf le-dira. |
- Doorway first, fence after → enclosed for dwelling → permitted.
- Fence first, doorway after → the enclosure already existed without link to the house → remains a karpef.
5. The Mishnah Berurah — opening entries
The Mishnah Berurah of the Chofetz Chaim has 5 entries on this siman:
Full text on Sefaria: Mishnah Berurah 359.
6. The position of the Rema
The Rema adds here a brief but decisive hagahah for practice. The Mechaber posed the theoretical case of a rechava that remains a karpef; the Rema explains why, in fact, we carry without concern in the courtyards behind houses.
- The reason for our leniency: in our time, courtyards behind houses are סְתָמָן מֻקָּפוֹת לְדִירָה — by default deemed enclosed for dwelling.
- The Rema explicitly refers to what he wrote in siman 358 on the karpef: the same favorable presumption applies.
- Consequence: the Mechaber's restrictive case has become rare in practice.
- Shitah of the Alter Rebbe → Shulchan Aruch HaRav, siman 359 (see Level 4).
7. Modern practical cases
| Situation | Quick analysis |
|---|---|
| Small fenced garden (less than beis sa'asayim) behind the house | No karpef status, even without intent to dwell: free carrying, including from the house to the garden and vice versa. |
| Large lot (over 5000 amos²) fenced to store wood or material, without a doorway to the house | Karpef status: carrying limited to 4 amos, and forbidden to carry from the house into it. |
| Large lot where a doorway was first opened from the house, then fenced | Enclosed for dwelling (הֵקֵּף לְדִירָה): free carrying throughout, regardless of size. |
| Ordinary courtyard behind a currently inhabited house | Per the Rema's gloss, presumed mukefes le-dira by default: carrying permitted without special arrangement. |
8. Practical synthesis
- A rechava more than beis sa'asayim, not enclosed for dwelling: karpef status — carrying limited to 4 amos.
- A rechava of beis sa'asayim or less: no karpef status — free carrying, including to the house.
- Doorway opened from the house before the fence: the space is mukaf le-dira — free carrying, even beyond beis sa'asayim and even with a threshing floor between.
- The Rema's gloss: today, courtyards behind houses are presumed enclosed for dwelling — hence our practical leniency.
- For halachah le-ma'aseh, consult your local Rav.
9. Comprehension questions
- What is the general topic of Siman שנ"ט?
- How many seifim? What is each one's theme?
- What is the difference between the Mechaber and the Rema?
- What structuring concepts appear?
- What practice should be remembered?
- In which borderline cases should one consult a Rav?
To go further
- 📚 Level 2 — Lamdan
- ✨ Level 3 — Synthesis
- 📜 Level 4 — Daat HaRav: Shitah of the Alter Rebbe (Shulchan Aruch HaRav siman 359)