דעת DAAT
← Siman קכ״ט Home ♥ Support
Home Yoreh De'ah · Wine left in a non-Jew's hands, and the Jew who comes and goes סימן קכ״ט Level 3 — Synthesis / Review
✦ ❖ ✦ D A A T · L E V E L 3 — S Y N T H E S I S / R E V I E W ✦ ❖ ✦

Siman 129 — Wine left in a non-Jew's hands, and the Jew who comes and goes

דין המניח יין ביד עובד כוכבים וישראל יוצא ונכנס

The Jew shuts his shop on his workman, steps off the boat, hurries to the synagogue — and the wine is left alone. Twenty seifim for one measure: does the non-Jew still believe the owner may walk back in at any moment? The winding path, the four sentences that break the fear, the time it takes to lift a stopper and put it back, the crack that counts as an open door, and what remains when nobody saw anything
Structured review, ruling tables, rapid memorisation


Source: Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah קכ״ט — 20 seifim
Nosei kelim: ש״ך (Shach) · ט״ז (Taz) · באר הגולה · ביאור הגר״א · פתחי תשובה · באר היטב
Compiled by: הרב יוסף חיים סממה · DAAT
For students who have mastered Levels 1 and 2
daattorah.com

📑 Outline of this synthesis

  1. The axiom: what guards the wine is not presence but מירתת
  2. The 4 reflex questions: who · where · how long · what was said
  3. Master table A — the three scenes of seif 1, and the five breaches
  4. The דרך עקלתון: the possibility of a sudden return (seifim 1, 2, 6, 7)
  5. The four sentences that break supervision
  6. The time threshold: כדי שיסיר את המגופה ויחזירנה ותנגב — and the single seal
  7. The place: the door, the crack, the key, the stakes (seifim 1, 5, 8, 16)
  8. Master table B — the eight scenes where מירתת is measured (seifim 6 to 15)
  9. When nobody saw anything: רוב, קורבא דמוכח and ריעותא (seifim 11, 17, 18, 19)
  10. The word of the non-Jew and of the maidservant (seifim 8, 13, 20)
  11. The 7 golden rules
  12. Mnemonic — the letters of מירתת
  13. The 6 classic traps
  14. Recap of the 20 seifim — one line each
  15. Final flash card

1. The axiom: what guards the wine is not presence but מירתת

The starting point:

Siman 128 asked what happens when a non-Jew finds himself alone where there is wine. Siman 129 asks the question that comes up every day of ordinary life: the Jew goes off for good — he leaves his workman in the shop, he steps off the boat, he hurries to the synagogue — and the wine is left with nobody. The Mechaber never answers he is absent, therefore it is forbidden. He answers with a single measure: does the non-Jew believe, at this very moment, that the owner may walk in?

That belief has a name — מירתת — and it is that, and not bodily presence, which guards the wine. The whole siman is nothing but an inventory of what sustains it and what breaks it: a path to appear by, a door left open, an ill-chosen sentence, a delay that ran too long. And once it has vanished altogether, the siman changes tools and turns to רוב.

The engine of the entire siman lies in eight words of seif 1: « מפני שהוא ירא בכל שעה עתה יבא ויראני » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א).

The mechanism is given exactly by the Shach (ש״ך יו״ד קכ״ט ס״ק א), and it is worth holding onto word for word: « כיון שהעובד כוכבים ידע שהישראל יודע שהוא שם אצל היין מירתת וסבור השתא יזכור הישראל יינו ויבא ויראנו ».

The leverWhat it establishesWhere it operates
מירתת — the fear of being caughtA non-Jew who thinks he may be seen does not touch, even after many hoursSeifim 1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 15
דרך עקלתון — the winding pathA sudden return must be materially possibleSeifim 1, 2, 6, 7
The time threshold of the מגופהA sealed barrel is lost only once the delay allows the seal to be undone and remadeSeifim 1, 7
רוב — the majorityWhere nobody saw anything, we no longer weigh fear but provenanceSeifim 11, 17, 18, 19
The leniency of זמן הזהIn our day non-Jews do not make nesekh, which softens the last stringency of the simanSeif 20, at the close
💡 The landmark: two regimes follow one another here, and they are never mixed. Seifim 1 to 16 judge an act of keeping: someone was there, we know who and when, and we measure what he believed. Seifim 17 to 19 judge a found object: nobody was there, there is nothing to measure, and we follow the majority. Seif 20 returns to the first regime one last time, with the word of the man who opened the door.

⚖ The two engines of seif 1

  1. What the non-Jew knows — is the owner, as far as he can tell, liable to come back unannounced? So long as he does not know, the length of the absence counts for nothing: the Mechaber permits אפילו שהה זמן רב.
  2. What the non-Jew can do — once he has shut the shop or moved the wagon off, he can no longer be seen, and the fear falls away of itself: « והוא שלא נודע שסגר העובד כוכבים החנות או שהרחיק הקרון והספינה בענין שאין יכולים לראותו » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א).
The Rama forestalls the false symmetry: a closed door is not a closed place. « ואפי׳ סגר החנות כל זמן שיש שם סדק או חור שיכולים לראות בתוכו חשוב כפתוח » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:א).

2. The 4 reflex questions: who · where · how long · what was said

■ 1. WHO WAS LEFT, AND IN WHAT CAPACITY? One non-Jew, or several? Is he the keeper of the place, or merely the carrier of the barrel? The carrier has an excuse ready for having touched; the keeper of a shop has none.
↓ once his standing is fixed, where is this happening?
■ 2. DOES THE PLACE ALLOW ONE TO SEE? Was the shop left open, or shut? A crack, a hole, a skylight is enough to make the place open. And is there a winding path by which the owner can appear without being spotted from afar?
↓ once the place is fixed, what was actually said?
■ 3. WHICH SENTENCE WAS SPOKEN? שמור לי, לך ואני אבא אחריך, notice that he is going away, or הוי מוזג ושותה: four formulas, four ways of telling the non-Jew that he will not be disturbed.
↓ and if the fear has fallen, only the quantitative question remains
■ 4. HOW LONG, AND UNDER WHAT SEAL? An open barrel: lost the moment it leaves his sight. A sealed barrel: lost only if the absence lasted long enough to remove the whole stopper, replace it and let it dry.

On the second question the Mechaber states the condition outright: « בד״א שיש דרך עקלתון שיכול לבא עליו פתאום שלא יראנו » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א).

And the ש״ך cites the ר״ן, who limits that demand to the carrier alone: « אבל בהניח וישראל יוצא ונכנס לא בעינן דרך עקלתון דכל שעה מתירא ממנו דילמא השתא אתי ישראל ויראהו מתקרב לחבית » (ש״ך יו״ד קכ״ט ס״ק ח).

⚠ The order of the questions matters. One ill-chosen sentence undoes the finest winding path: once the owner has said he is going away, the non-Jew fears nothing, and all that is left to argue about is the seal and the delay. Conversely, no seal can rescue a barrel left open in a carrier's hands.

3. Master table A — the three scenes of seif 1, and the five breaches

The basis is seif 1, with the ש״ך and the ט״ז. The Mechaber opens with three scenes he treats as one, then lists what breaks them.

The sceneWhat the Jew doesRuling at the outsetWhy
The shopHe leaves the non-Jew in his shop and goes outPermitted, even at lengthThe non-Jew does not know when he will be back
The boat or wagonHe goes off to the synagogue or the bathhousePermitted, even at lengthThe same — provided he was not seen entering the bathhouse
The carrierA non-Jew carries a barrel for him from place to placePermittedHe is afraid of being overtaken on the way

The five breaches of seif 1

The breachThe factEffect
The place closesThe non-Jew shut the shop, or moved the wagon and boat off until he could not be seenThe fear falls — unless a crack or hole remains
No winding pathThe owner cannot return without being spotted from afarThe fear falls
He was seen entering the bathhouse« אבל אם ראה שהלך ליכנס לבית המרחץ יודע שלא ימהר לבא » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א)The fear falls
He said שמור לי« וכן אם אמר לעובד כוכבים שהניח בחנות שמור לי יודע שנסתלק משמירתו » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א)The owner has withdrawn from his own watch
He gave notice of leavingTo the carrier: לך ואני אבא אחריך — or word that he is offOpen: forbidden once out of sight. Sealed: by the delay
💡 Not to be confused: duration and knowledge. The Mechaber expressly permits a long absence so long as the non-Jew knows nothing; he forbids a short one once notice has been given. It is not time that forbids, it is information.

The Rama finally separates the permitted from the advisable: « לכתחלה לא יניח אדם בביתו יין או חומץ אצל עובד כוכבים לבד כלל אבל בדיעבד מותר » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:א).

4. The דרך עקלתון: the possibility of a sudden return (seifim 1, 2, 6, 7)

The דרך עקלתון is the roundabout way by which the owner can reappear without having been seen coming. Without it the non-Jew watches the straight road, sees the owner from afar, and has all the time he needs.

The caseThe ruleSource
One non-Jew, a winding path availablePermittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
Two non-Jews or moreForbidden — one watches, the other touchesשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ב
He went to the bathhouse by a detour, unnoticedPermittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
He was seen entering the bathhouseForbidden — he knows he will not be back soonשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
He left the boat at the shofar blast, one non-Jew aboardPermitted, even beyond two thousand cubitsשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ו
He went off to pray, each drinking his own winePermitted, where a winding path existsשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ז

The rule of number is stated plainly: « הא דשרי כשיש דרך עקלתון דוקא כשהעובד כוכבים לבדו אבל אם הם שנים או יותר אסור שאפשר לאחד מהם לשמור הדרך עקלתון והאחר יגע » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ב).

And seif 6 adds a reason that surprises at first and then illuminates everything — the wine is permitted even far off: « אם יש דרך עקלתון שיוכל לבא עליו פתאום ואין שם אלא עובד כוכבים א׳ מותר היין אפילו אם יש בינו ליין יותר מאלפים אמה שאין אנו בעיניהם בחזקת שומרי שבת כראוי » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ו).

💡 Why that reason is a principle: it is not the fact of the distance that counts but what the non-Jew infers from it. Since he does not credit us with being scrupulous enough to stay inside the Shabbat limit, he holds the owner's return to be possible — and so he is afraid. The whole siman reasons this way: not about facts, but about what the other man concludes from them.

5. The four sentences that break supervision

Four formulas recur in this siman. Each, spoken by the owner, tells the non-Jew the same thing: you will not be disturbed. These are the real grounds of prohibition here, far more than the length of the absence.

The sentenceWhat it signalsEffectSource
שמור לי — guard this for meThe owner has discharged himself of his own watchForbiddenשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
לך ואני אבא אחריך — go on, I shall followThe carrier knows he will not be overtaken at onceOpen forbidden; sealed by the delayשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
הודיעו שהוא מפליג — he gave notice of leavingThe owner can no longer walk inOpen forbidden; sealed by the delayשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
הוי מוזג ושותה — pour and drinkThe non-Jew has been given title to approach the wineEvery open barrel in the house forbiddenשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ז

The fourth deserves to be read in full, since it reaches far beyond the table they were drinking at: « ואם אמר לו הוי מוזג ושותה כל החביות הפתוחות שבבית אסורות והסתומות מותרות » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ז).

⚖ Three exceptions that rescue an ill-chosen sentence

  1. The season of heavy traffic. Even after notice, where the barrel is plugged and the roads are busy, it is permitted: « אפילו הודיעו שהוא מפליג אם החבית פקוקה והוא בזמן שיש הרבה עוברי דרכים כגון בין הגתות מותר שהוא מתירא מעוברי דרכים אפילו הם עובדי כוכבים » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ד). The guarding passes from the owner to the strangers on the road.
  2. The key alone. Handing over the key is not handing over the place: « שלא מסר לו אלא שמירת המפתח והוא ירא ליכנס בו » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ה) — and that holds even after notice of leaving.
  3. The seal. A sealed barrel is lost only at the end of a measured delay, and the Rama further adds the leniency of the single seal where the loss is great.
⚠ The trap of seif 7. One assumes the question is where the wine stood. Partly it is: on the table, forbidden; off the table, only what lies within arm's reach — « ואת שחוץ לשלחן את שתוך פישוט ידיו אסור ושחוץ לפישוט ידיו מותר » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ז). But once the sentence הוי מוזג ושותה has been spoken, geography no longer counts: the whole house turns over.

6. The time threshold: כדי שיסיר את המגופה ויחזירנה ותנגב — and the single seal

Once the fear is gone the siman does not say forbidden: it measures. An open barrel is lost with no delay; a sealed one only after the time materially needed to undo the seal and remake it unnoticed.

■ OPEN BARREL « אם החביות פתוחות כיון שנעלמו מעיניו אסורות » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א). No delay to measure: losing sight of it is enough.
↓ but if the barrel carries a seal
■ SEALED BARREL — THE THRESHOLD « ואם הם סתומות אם יש בהפלגתו שיעור כדי שיוכל להסיר מגופות החבית כולה בין שהיא של טיט בין שהיא של סיד ולהחזירה ותנגב אסור » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א). Three acts, one delay: remove the whole stopper, replace it, and let it dry.
↓ and the view that dispenses with the calculation altogether
■ THE VIEW OF ר״ת « וי״א דאם הם סתומות שרי בכל ענין דיין סגי ליה חותם א׳ » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:א) — whereupon the Rama concludes that one may rely on it where the loss is great, and points to siman 130.

What that leniency costs and what it buys, the Shach spells out exactly (ש״ך יו״ד קכ״ט ס״ק י״א): « היינו משום דיש פוסקים דסתימת מגופה לא הוי כחותם אבל בחותם אחד ממש סגי בדיעבד אפילו בלא הפסד מרובה ».

State of the barrelNo notice givenNotice given
Open, no stopperPermitted, even at lengthForbidden once out of sight
Plugged with a plain stopper פקוקPermittedPermitted in the season of passers-by; otherwise forbidden
Sealed with a מגופה of clay or limePermittedForbidden only once the full delay has passed
Sealed, where the loss is greatPermittedPermitted per ר״ת, on whom the Rama allows reliance
💡 The detail that decides: ותנגב. The delay does not stop at putting the stopper back: it takes in the drying. A reseal still damp shows — which is why it is not dangerous. The siman does not count the time of the deed, it counts the time of erasing the traces.

7. The place: the door, the crack, the key, the stakes (seifim 1, 5, 8, 16)

After time, place. The siman keeps returning to one material question: from where he stands, can he be seen? A closed door does not by itself answer no.

The settingRulingSource
Shop left openPermittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
Shop shut, but a crack or hole lets one seePermitted — counted as openרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:א
Door bolted from within, no crackThere alone does the Rama forbidרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:ה
The key handed over, not the placePermitted, even with no Jew in the cityשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ה
Door bolted but not locked, the owner gonePermittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ח
Upper floor and house joined by a skylightPermitted, where they went out and back in hasteשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ט
Courtyard divided by the heads of stakesPermitted, even within his reachשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ט״ז

Seif 5 lays down the distinction the rest presupposes: « המוסר מפתח חנותו לעובד כוכבים היין שבו מותר אפילו לא נשאר שום יהודי בעיר » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ה).

From it the Rama draws the rule of the thief: « ואם עבר העובד כוכבים ונכנס שם אם נתפס כגנב שרי ואם אינו נתפס כגנב ויש לו התנצלות על מה שנכנס אסור » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:ה).

And he confines the prohibition to the truly closed place: « ודוקא אם סגר הדלת במנעול מבפנים ואין סדק בחדר שיכולים לראות משם » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:ה).

⚠ Where nothing holds him back any longer. The Rama names the case in which the whole mechanism stops working: « ואם העובד כוכבים אינו מירתת כגון עבדי המושל שתפסו היהודי » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:ה). A man acting under the authority of the state fears nobody — and the measure of the siman has no purchase on him. A sign that nothing was touched is then required.
💡 The line of stakes: in seif 16 a mere row of pegs suffices to divide two domains, even where the neighbour's hand reaches the barrel. The divider need not be a wall: it is enough that it marks a right. Here too it is not matter that forbids, but what the other man allows himself.

8. Master table B — the eight scenes where מירתת is measured (seifim 6 to 15)

Seifim 6 to 15 are not a list of curiosities: they are ten readings of the same instrument, taken in steadily less favourable conditions. Read them in a column and the principle emerges.

SeifThe sceneRulingWhat decides it
6The Friday shofar; the Jew goes into the city and leaves the wine in the boatPermittedThey do not credit us with staying put
7The call to prayer; each was drinking his own winePermittedThe winding path still stands
7They drank from one wine, cups on the tableThe table forbidden, arm's reach forbiddenThe non-Jew has title to touch
8The bolt slid home, the key forgotten, the owner already far offPermittedThe non-Jew did not know of the departure
9Out in haste to see a bridegroom; the non-Jew shuts up behind himPermittedHe assumed the Jew had got in first
9The same scene, but without hasteForbiddenUnhurried, he would have checked
10The lion roars; the non-Jew hides among the barrelsPermitted, even openHe tells himself another man may be hiding there
12Troops enter the city in peacetimeOpen forbidden, sealed permittedIn peace a soldier fears being called to account
12The same troops, in wartimeAll permittedThey are busy with something other than wine
14A non-Jewish courtesan at a Jewish gatheringPermittedThe company will not let her
14A Jewish courtesan among non-JewsEven her own wine is forbiddenNobody is watching anything
15The window open, the non-Jew inside with a courtesanPermittedHe had other things on his mind

Seif 9 says exactly why a door shut on the wine does not forbid it: « שלא סגר העובד כוכבים אלא על דעת שכבר נכנס הישראל לביתו ולא נשאר אדם בחוץ וכמדומה לו שהוא קדמו » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ט).

The Rama at once sets the limit: « ודוקא שיצאו בבהלה וחזרו דאפשר לומר שמתוך בהלתו חזר ולא דקדק יפה בכניסת ישראל אבל שלא בבהלה היין אסור » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:ט).

Seif 10 pushes the reasoning to its limit: « עובד כוכבים ששמע קול שאגת אריה ומפחדו נחבא בין החביות יין וסגר הדלת אחריו מותר אפי׳ הן פתוחות מפני שהוא אומר שמא ישראל אחר נחבא כאן ויראה אותי כשאגע » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י).

On seif 14 the ט״ז brings the reason of the gemara, and it is worth holding onto: « נהי דתקיף להו יצרא דעבירה יצרא דיין נסך לא תקיף להו » (ט״ז יו״ד קכ״ט ס״ק כ״ד).

And on seif 15 the ש״ך sums up in five words why the wine came through untouched: « דבעבידתיה טרוד ואין לו פנאי לנסך » (ש״ך יו״ד קכ״ט ס״ק ל״ו).

9. When nobody saw anything: רוב, קורבא דמוכח and ריעותא (seifim 11, 17, 18, 19)

In seifim 11 and 17 to 19 the whole setting changes. There is no keeper, no owner stepping out, no fear to measure: there is an open barrel in a cellar, a barrel adrift on a river, a skin by the roadside. The question is no longer what did he believe? but where did this come from?

The caseThe ruleSource
Thieves in the cellar, most thieves non-JewsForbiddenשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א
Most thieves JewsPermittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א
Most of them IshmaelitesForbidden to drink, permitted for benefitשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א
A Jewish quarter no non-Jewish thoroughfare cuts throughWe follow the majority of the quarterשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א
A place where money is hidden in barrelsPermitted — they came for the moneyשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א
Sealed found sealed, or nothing amiss at allAll permittedרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א
A floating barrel, a dam upstream, a Jewish city oppositePermittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ז
A floating barrel with no damForbidden — we follow the surrounding majorityשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ז
A barrel in a Jewish vineyard, non-Jewish vineyards mostly aroundForbidden, even against telling proximityשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ח
Large skins, most wine-pourers JewsPermittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ט
Small skins aloneForbidden — that is the travellers' sizeשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ט
Large and small togetherAll permittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ט

The opening rule is stated without qualification: « גנבים שנכנסו למרתף ופתחו חביות יין אם רוב גנבי העיר עובדי כוכבים אסור ואם רובן ישראל מותר ואם רובן ישמעאלים אסור בשתיה ומותר בהנאה » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א).

The Rama at once narrows its reach to what was actually observed: « אבל אם היו סתומות ונמצאו סתומות או שהיו כולם פתוחות ולא נמצא בהם ריעותא הכל שרי » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א).

And seif 18 lays down the principle the last three seifim apply: « החבית אסורה דאזלינן בתר רובא אף ע״ג דאיכא קורבא דמוכח דשל ישראל היתה » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ח).

💡 What ריעותא changes: with no irregularity observed there is not even a matter to rule on. The Rama does not say the wine is permitted because we are lenient; he says there is nothing to judge. That is the difference between a doubt and the absence of one — and it is what makes seif 11 workable.

10. The word of the non-Jew and of the maidservant (seifim 8, 13, 20)

Three seifim put on stage a non-Jew who speaks: the one who reports that a door was not locked, the one who admits to entering to draw water, and the maid who says where the wine came from. This is not testimony — the siman never believes them on their word — but one more fact to weigh.

Who speaksWhat he saysEffectSource
The non-Jewish neighbourThe door had not been locked for daysPermitted — he did not know of the departure, so he was afraidשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ח
The man who opened the storeroomHe went in to draw water to build his housePermittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:כ
The maid, about the wine on the tableShe took it from the cellarThe wine on the table is forbiddenרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:כ
The maid, about the wine in the cellarShe took it from the cellarThe cellar stays permitted — she is not believedרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:כ
The maid, about the taps found shutShe is the one who shut themForbidden — except in our own dayרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:כ
The non-Jew by the winepressHe says nothing; the moisture is measuredRinsing, and wiping where there is enough to wetשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ג

The tale of the bolt instructs because the owner was at fault and still comes through: « ישראל ששכר בית בחצר העובד כוכבים והניח בו יין וסגר הדלת והכניס הבריח בטבעת ושכח ולא סגרו במפתח והפליג » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ח) — and the Rama gives the reason: « הואיל ולא ידע העובד כוכבים שמפליג הישראל מירתת ולא נגע » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:ח).

On the maidservant the Rama is blunt: « דאין העובדת כוכבי׳ נאמנת ואימר במקום אחר לקחה » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:כ).

And he closes the siman on the leniency that governs the whole subject today: « מיהו בזמן הזה דאין העובדי כוכבים מנסכים שרי » (רמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:כ).

⚖ Seif 13, on its own

The winepress is not a matter of keeping but of residue. « עובד כוכבים שנמצא עומד אצל הגת אם יש בה טופח על מנת להטפיח » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ג), and then « צריך הדחה וניגוב ואי לא בהדחה סגי » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ג). The ש״ך explains why we are stricter here than elsewhere: « דחיישינן שמא נגע בו דלא מירתת למיגע שהוא סבור שאינו מפסידו כיון שאין בו יין עוד » (ש״ך יו״ד קכ״ט ס״ק ל״ד). Where almost nothing is left, the non-Jew does not believe he is spoiling anything — and so he is not afraid.

11. The 7 golden rules

  1. Duration says nothing. A long absence is permitted, a short one may forbid. What decides is not the time elapsed but what the non-Jew knew about the return.
  2. A closed door is not a closed place. A crack, a hole, a skylight, a roof above: anything that lets one see restores the permission.
  3. Carrier and keeper are not judged alike. The man holding the barrel has an excuse ready; the man minding the shop has none.
  4. A sentence costs more than an hour. שמור לי, לך ואני אבא אחריך, notice of leaving, הוי מוזג ושותה: these are the real grounds of prohibition here.
  5. A seal buys time, not immunity. The threshold is the delay that allows the stopper to be removed, replaced and dried — the time to erase the trace, not the time of the deed.
  6. With no irregularity there is nothing to judge. Sealed found sealed, or all open with nothing amiss: the question of majority does not even arise.
  7. When the fear is wholly gone, change tools. The governor's men, the drifting barrel, the skin on the road: we no longer gauge a fear, we follow a majority.

12. Mnemonic — the letters of מירתת

The letters of מירתת — the fear that guards the wine — serve as a prompt for the questions of the siman.

And bear in mind that if all five answers are favourable, one question remains, the Rama's closing one: are we בזמן הזה?

13. The 6 classic traps

  1. Treating the long absence as the problem. The Mechaber expressly permits אפילו שהה זמן רב. Asking how long the Jew stayed out is asking for the wrong datum.
  2. Reading seif 3 as a repetition of seif 1. It says the opposite about the carrier: « ואפילו היא חסרה אסורה דחיישינן דילמא נגע ולא יירא כלל שיכול להשמט ולומר להחזיק בה כוונתי שלא תפול » (שו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ג). What saves the keeper undoes the carrier — because the carrier can justify himself.
  3. Extending the דרך עקלתון to every case. The ש״ך cites the ר״ן that it is demanded only of the carrier, the man holding the barrel in his hand or on his shoulder.
  4. Taking פקוק for סתום. A plain stopper and a clay seal are not the same thing — seif 12 sets them against each other explicitly in peacetime.
  5. Forgetting the drying. The time threshold is not the time to open and close: it takes in ותנגב.
  6. Applying רוב before anything has been observed. The Rama forbids that shortcut: with no ריעותא there is nothing to decide, and the wine is simply permitted.

One last and quieter trap: seif 11 deals with a Jewish quarter, and seif 18 with telling proximity. They look like the same idea. They are opposites: in seif 11 the separateness of the quarter makes it the whole body of the calculation; in seif 18 nearness weighs nothing against the majority. The first is a boundary, the second a mere distance.

14. Recap of the 20 seifim — one line each

SeifSubjectThe essentials
1The three scenes, and what breaks themOne who leaves a non-Jew in his shop and goes out; one who has wine in a boat or a wagon and leaves it with the non-Jew while he goes to the synagogue or the bathhouse; and one whose barrel a non-Jew is carrying from place to place, left alone with the wine: permitted, even if he tarried a long while, because the non-Jew fears at every moment that the owner will walk in and see him. The Rama adds that at the outset one never leaves wine or vinegar alone with a non-Jew at all, though after the fact it is permitted. The permission falls away if it is known that the non-Jew shut the shop or moved the wagon or boat far enough that he cannot be seen — and the Rama stresses that a crack or a hole through which one can see inside counts as open. There must further be a winding path by which the owner can appear unseen; and if the non-Jew saw him go into the bathhouse, he knows he will not be back soon. So too if he said “ guard this for me ”, or told the carrier “ go on, I shall follow ”, or informed him that he was going away: open barrels are forbidden the moment they leave his sight; sealed barrels only if the absence lasted long enough to remove the whole stopper, replace it and let it dry. Rama: some hold a sealed barrel is permitted in every case, one seal sufficing for wine, and one may rely on this where the loss is great.
2The winding path works only against one manThe permission that rests on the דרך עקלתון holds only where the non-Jew is alone. Where they are two or more it is forbidden: one can watch the winding path while the other touches.
3The carrier is not the keeperThat fully open barrels, with no stopper at all, remain permitted holds only in a boat or a shop, where the non-Jew has no title to touch the barrel itself. But with one carrying a barrel from place to place, no: even a barrel already broached is forbidden, since we fear he touched it with no fear whatever, being able to slip away and say he only meant to steady it so it would not fall.
4Passers-by do the guardingEven where he informed him he was going away: if the barrel is plugged and it is a season of heavy traffic — such as between the winepresses — it is permitted, for he fears the passers-by even where they are non-Jews.
5The key is not the houseOne who hands the key of his shop to a non-Jew: the wine inside is permitted, even if no Jew is left in the city, and even if he informed him he was going away — for he entrusted him only with the guarding of the key, and he is afraid to go in. One view limits the permission to where he does not know that he is going away. Rama: we are lenient like the first view. If the non-Jew went in nonetheless: held as a thief, permitted; not held as a thief, with an excuse to offer, forbidden. And all this only where the door was bolted from within with no crack; but an open door, or even a crack alone, leaves the wine permitted, since the non-Jew is מירתת. Where he fears nothing — the governor's men who have seized the Jew — everything is forbidden unless there is a sign that they did not touch.
6The Friday shofarA Jew and a non-Jew in a boat carrying wine; the Jew hears the shofar blast that announces the cessation of work and goes into the city, leaving the wine with the non-Jew: if there is a winding path and only one non-Jew is there, the wine is permitted even beyond two thousand cubits — for in their eyes we are not held to be scrupulous keepers of Shabbat.
7The table, arm's reach, and “ pour and drink ”They were sitting, each drinking his own wine, and the Jew went off to pray at the call to the synagogue: the wine stays permitted where there is a winding path. But if they were drinking together from one wine, with wine before them on the table and other wine off the table: what is on the table is forbidden; of what is off the table, whatever lies within arm's reach is forbidden and what lies beyond is permitted. And if he told him “ pour and drink ”, every open barrel in the house is forbidden and the sealed ones permitted — unless he tarried long enough to remove the stopper, replace it and let it dry.
8The bolt without the keyA Jew who rented a house in a non-Jew's courtyard, left wine there, shut the door and slid the bolt into the ring, but forgot to turn the key, and went away; days later the non-Jew notices it was not locked and tells the Jew: permitted. Rama: since the non-Jew did not know the Jew was going away, he is מירתת and did not touch.
9Out in haste, back in hasteA house where a Jew keeps wine, the non-Jew living below and the Jew upstairs, with a skylight from the upper floor into the house; both rush out in haste to see a bridegroom or a eulogy, the non-Jew returns and shuts the door, and the Jew comes in after him: although the Jew has no way through except the house, and cannot pass unseen, the open wine stays permitted — the non-Jew shut the door only supposing that the Jew had already gone in and had got there first. Rama: and only where they went out and came back in haste; without that haste the wine is forbidden.
10The roar of the lionA non-Jew who, hearing a lion roar, hid in fear among the wine barrels and shut the door behind him: permitted, even where the barrels are open — for he says to himself that another Jew may be hiding there and will see him if he touches.
11Thieves, and the ריעותאThieves who broke into a cellar and opened barrels of wine: if most of the city's thieves are non-Jews, forbidden; if most are Jews, permitted; if most are Ishmaelites, forbidden to drink and permitted for benefit. A Jewish quarter that no non-Jewish thoroughfare cuts through is judged by its own majority. And where money is customarily hidden in barrels set among the wine barrels, it is permitted even where most thieves are non-Jews — they may have come only for the money. Rama: all this only where some ריעותא was observed; sealed barrels found sealed, or all of them open with nothing amiss, are entirely permitted, an ordinary thief not taking wine. Where only some show the irregularity, all remain permitted. And some hold this speaks only of known non-Jewish thieves: where one Jewish thief is known and no non-Jew is, we attribute it to the known Jew.
12Troops: peace and warTroops that entered the city and a Jew's house in peacetime: open barrels, even plugged with a wooden stopper, are forbidden; those sealed with a clay stopper are permitted. In wartime both are permitted. And this speaks of barrels open from the outset; those that were sealed and were opened, we suspect.
13Standing by the winepressA non-Jew found standing by the winepress: if enough moisture is left there that a wet hand will wet another — טופח על מנת להטפיח — it needs rinsing and wiping; if not, rinsing suffices.
14The courtesanA non-Jewish courtesan at a Jewish gathering: the wine is permitted, for they will not let her touch it. But a Jewish courtesan at a gathering of non-Jews: even the courtesan's own wine is forbidden.
15The window left openHe left wine at home with the window open; a non-Jew came, brought a courtesan in and shut the door behind him; the Jew came back afterwards and found his wine as he had left it: permitted.
16The courtyard divided by stakesA courtyard divided by the heads of stakes between a Jew and a non-Jew: although open barrels stand close to the non-Jew's portion and within his reach, they are permitted. So too if the Jew's roof is above the non-Jew's and they are divided by stakes, he may leave his wine there although the other's hand reaches it.
17The floating barrelA barrel of wine floating down the river and found opposite a city that is mostly Jewish: if the river holds obstacles and a dam that would have stopped it had it come from elsewhere, it is permitted, since it can be traced only to the city facing it; with no dam it is forbidden, since we trace it to the surrounding majority, which is non-Jewish. Found opposite a mostly non-Jewish city, if the surroundings are mostly Jewish and it could come by a straight course, it is permitted even very close to the non-Jewish city: we set proximity aside and follow the majority. Otherwise the wine is forbidden for benefit and the jug belongs to the finder; and if a Jew comes and identifies it by a mark, the wine too is permitted. Rama: and only where it is plugged; wide open, the wine is forbidden.
18The barrel in the vineyardA barrel of wine found in a Jew's vineyard, with other Jewish vineyards nearby and many non-Jewish vineyards around, however distant: the barrel is forbidden, for we follow the majority even against telling proximity. And likewise to be lenient: found in a non-Jew's vineyard, where Jewish vineyards are more numerous even at a distance, we go leniently — provided the place lies among the hills where no travellers pass; otherwise it is forbidden, most travellers being non-Jews. And all this for a flask, not for a barrel that travellers do not carry.
19Wineskins on the roadWineskins found thrown down on the road: if most of those who pour wine are Jews, they are permitted where they are large; small ones are forbidden, since travellers carry such, and most travellers are non-Jews. But where large and small are found together, all are permitted: the large ones testify about the small, which came only to balance the load.
20The non-Jew's admission, and the maidservantA Jew who keeps wine in his storeroom locked with a key, finds the door open, and one non-Jew admits that he opened it to draw water from the pit inside so as to build his house: permitted. Rama: a householder who told his maidservant to set the table, finds wine on it, and is told by her that she took it from the cellar: the wine in the cellar is permitted — she is not believed — and the wine on the table is forbidden. So too with the hidden key and the jug found buried in straw. But where thieves drew wine and left the taps open, and the taps were later found shut, and the maidservant says she shut them: since she was alone with the wine, is not held as a thief, and the circumstances bear her out, the wine is forbiddenexcept in our own day, when non-Jews do not make nesekh.

15. Final flash card

QuestionReflex answerSource
The Jew left his shop and stayed away a long while?Permitted — the non-Jew does not know when he returnsשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
The non-Jew shut the shop?Forbidden — unless a crack or hole remainsשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א ; רמ״א שם
No winding path at all?Forbidden — he will see the owner coming from afarשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
There are two non-Jews?Forbidden, even with a winding pathשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ב
The Jew said “ guard this for me ”?Forbidden — he withdrew from his own watchשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
He gave notice of leaving, barrels open?Forbidden once they leave his sightשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
The same, barrels sealed?Forbidden only once the delay of the מגופה has passedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:א
A great loss on a sealed barrel?One may rely on ר״ת: a single seal sufficesרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:א
Notice given, but plugged in the season of passers-by?Permitted — he fears the passers-by, non-Jews includedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ד
He was handed the key of the shop?Permitted, even with no Jew left in the cityשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ה
He went in anyway?Permitted if held as a thief, forbidden if he has an excuseרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:ה
These are the governor's men?All forbidden, absent a sign that nothing was touchedרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:ה
He said “ pour and drink ”?Every open barrel in the house is forbiddenשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ז
The wine stood off the table?Forbidden within arm's reach, permitted beyondשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ז
Out in haste, and the non-Jew shut the door?Permitted — he assumed the Jew had got in firstשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ט
Troops came in during wartime?All permitted — open as well as sealedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ב
A non-Jew by a damp winepress?Rinsing and wiping where there is טופח על מנת להטפיחשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ג
A courtyard divided by stakes?Permitted, even within his reachשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:ט״ז
Thieves, but nothing amiss observed?All permitted — a thief does not carry off wineרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:י״א
A barrel found in a Jewish vineyard, non-Jewish vineyards around?Forbidden — majority outweighs proximityשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ח
Large and small wineskins together?All permittedשו״ע יו״ד קכ״ט:י״ט
The maid says she shut the taps?Forbidden by the letter — permitted in our own dayרמ״א יו״ד קכ״ט:כ

⚖ The reflex in 3 questions

  1. What does the non-Jew know? If he does not know the owner has gone off, the fear holds, and duration does not count.
  2. Can he be seen? A crack, a skylight, a winding path: anything that makes the return possible saves the wine.
  3. And if the fear has fallen? Then measure the seal and the delay; and if nobody was there at all, follow the majority.
For practical halacha, consult your Rav.

🎓 Recap of the study path

LevelContentOutcome
🌱 Level 1 — Base The text of all 20 seifim, translation, step-by-step explanation Overall understanding
Level 2 — Lamdan The definition of מירתת, the reach of דרך עקלתון per the ר״ן and the ב״ח, the single seal of ר״ת, and how רוב stands against קורבא דמוכח In-depth study
Level 3 — Synthesis Two master tables, the four sentences, the time threshold, golden rules, mnemonic, traps, and a recap of all 20 seifim Practical mastery and review
📜 Level 4 — Halacha le-ma'aseh The practical ruling according to the ש״ך, the ט״ז, the פתחי תשובה and the poskim Contemporary application
💡 Suggested next steps:
📖 Sources for this siman on Sefaria:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
DAAT · הרב יוסף חיים סממה
תלמיד חכם · מעביר שיעורים בהלכה ובחסידות
סימן קכ״ט · Level 3 — Synthesis / Review · דין המניח יין ביד עובד כוכבים וישראל יוצא ונכנס
daattorah.com

DAAT דעת — © 5786 / 2026 · Back to home · Siman קכ״ט · ♥ Support

📖Join the chavruta