דעת DAAT
← Siman ק״ל Home ♥ Support
Home Yoreh De'ah · Sealing the wine — one seal, two seals סימן ק״ל Level 3 — Synthesis / Review
✦ ❖ ✦ D A A T · L E V E L 3 — S Y N T H E S I S / R E V I E W ✦ ❖ ✦

Siman 130 — Sealing the wine — one seal, two seals

דיני חתימת היין

The wine leaves with nobody to follow it. What replaces the Jewish eye is an object: the seal. One seal or two, according to what is dreaded; what counts as a seal and what does not; the vessel that empties a seal of meaning; a seal found undone; and in the last two seifim the wine that no longer travels, where place takes over from seal
Structured review, psak tables, rapid memorisation


Source: Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah ק״ל — 10 seifim
Nossei kelim: ש״ך (Shach) · ט״ז (Taz) · באר הגולה · ביאור הגר״א · פתחי תשובה · באר היטב
Compiled by: הרב יוסף חיים סממה · DAAT
For students who have mastered Levels 1 and 2
daattorah.com

📑 Plan of the synthesis

  1. The axiom: the seal stands in place of watching
  2. The 3 reflex questions: which liquid · which vessel · which place
  3. Master grid A — one seal or two (seifim 1, 2, 3)
  4. Master grid B — what counts as a seal (seifim 4 to 7)
  5. The vessel: clay, wood, skin — and the Rama's custom (seif 1)
  6. A seal found broken or unrecognised (seif 8)
  7. A house rented or bought inside a non-Jew's courtyard (seif 9)
  8. The Jew's own courtyard: the thief, by day and by night (seif 10)
  9. מרתת — the hidden spring of simanim 128, 129 and 130
  10. The cross-reference to Siman 118: sealing beyond wine
  11. Practical cases
  12. The 7 golden rules
  13. Mnemonic — the memory aid « חותם »
  14. The 5 classic pitfalls
  15. Recap of all 10 seifim — one line each
  16. Final flash card

1. The axiom: the seal stands in place of watching

The starting point:

Simanim 128 and 129 dealt with presence: a non-Jew left alone where there is wine, a Jew who goes out and comes back, and everything turning on what the non-Jew is afraid of. Siman 130 changes the instrument. Here the wine leaves: it is deposited, it is shipped, it travels for days with no Jewish eye following it.

What replaces watching is no longer a person but an object: the חותם, the seal. And the question of the whole siman becomes arithmetical — one seal, or two? — and then descriptive: what exactly counts as a seal?

The Mehaber opens with the permission and with its price: « מותר להפקיד ולשלוח יין ביד עובד כוכבים אם הוא חתום בחותם בתוך חותם או מפתח וחותם » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א).

Two distinct fears stand behind that number, and telling them apart governs the whole tariff.

The fearWhat it dreadsWhat it costs
ניסוך / נגיעה — that he touch the wineOrdinary wine, which a non-Jew's touch forbidsTwo seals: חותם בתוך חותם or מפתח וחותם
איחלופי — that he swap in his ownAnything worth having, that touching does not forbidOne seal is enough

The ש״ך sets out that division in a single line, commenting on the single seal allowed for cooked wine: « דאי משום איסוכי לא מנסכי ליה אי משום איחלופי כיון דאיכא חותם אחד לא טרח ומזייף » (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ז).

The ט״ז says the same thing on the same seif: « דבזה אין שייך ניסוך רק שמא יחליף עם יין שלו וכיון שיש חותם אחד לא טרח ומזייף » (ט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ו).

💡 The decisive marker: a seal prevents nothing physically. A determined man breaks it in a moment. What it does is make forgery costlyלא טרח ומזייף — or riskyמרתת. The ש״ך names both springs together: « דמאי דסמכינן אקשר משונה או חותם היינו משום דלא טרח ומזייף א״נ מרתת » (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ח). Read the whole siman from there: wherever a device costs nothing to undo, or wherever the non-Jew has nothing to dread, it is not a seal.

2. The 3 reflex questions

■ 1. WHICH LIQUID? Ordinary wine — it takes two seals. Cooked wine, wine mixed with honey or oil, vinegarone is enough, since touching no longer forbids them and only the fear of a swap is left (seif 3).
↓ the count is fixed: what is the wine travelling in?
■ 2. WHICH VESSEL? In clay, a seal holds: you get in only through the mouth. In wood or in a skin, wine can be drawn between the boards or the stitches without touching the seal — the Mehaber refuses, the Rama permits, and the custom follows the Rama on conditions (seif 1).
↓ but wine is not always in transit: sometimes it simply sits somewhere
■ 3. WHICH PLACE, AND WHAT TITLE OVER IT? Once the wine sits in a house or a courtyard, the seal no longer decides: who lives there, and whose place is it. Has the non-Jew any שייכות? Would he be נתפס עליו כגנב? Is it day or night? (seifim 9 and 10).
⚠ The order of the questions is not idle: many mistakes come from applying the tariff of seals to a question about a place, or the reverse. Seifim 1 to 8 speak of wine deposited or shipped; seifim 9 and 10 of wine left standing. The first regime is settled by counting seals, the second by measuring a tie to a place.

3. Master grid A — one seal or two

Basis: seifim 1, 2 and 3, with the ש״ך and the ט״ז. Cases are sorted by what was handed over and by what was actually done, never by how trustworthy the carrier looks.

The caseThe wordingRulingSource
Ordinary wine deposited or shipped by a non-Jew's hand « מותר להפקיד ולשלוח יין ביד עובד כוכבים אם הוא חתום בחותם בתוך חותם או מפתח וחותם » Permitted with two seals שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א
One seal only, as a matter of fact « אם הפקיד ביד עובד כוכבים בחותם א׳ אסור בשתיה ומותר בהנאה והוא שייחד לו קרן זוית » Forbidden to drink, permitted for benefit שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ב
Why benefit stays permitted « דאז הוה כחצרו של ישראל משום הכי מותר בהנאה » The reserved corner makes the spot a Jewish courtyard ט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ד
Once the thing is done — בדיעבד « ויש שכתבו דבדיעבד יש להתיר אפילו בחותם אחד » There is ground to permit רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ב
But a real seal, not a mere bung « דוקא בחותם אבל סתומות במגופה לא הוי בדיעבד כחותם אחד אלא במקום הפסד מרובה » A bung is no seal, save where loss is great ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ד
Must one recognise one's own seal? « ואין צריך להכיר חותמו אלא אם כן רואה שחותמו מקולקל אז אסור » No — unless it is visibly damaged רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ב
And the custom? « אבל אין צריך לבדוק אחר זה וכן נוהגין להקל ועיין לעיל סימן קי״ח » One does not investigate, and custom is lenient רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ב
Cooked wine, mixed wine, vinegar « יין מבושל שלנו וכן יין שלנו שעירבו עם דברים אחרים כגון דבש ושמן וכן חומץ שלנו מותר להפקיד ביד עובד כוכבים בחותם אחד » One seal שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ג

⚖ Three points that shift how seif 2 reads

  1. “Permitted for benefit” is no consolation prize. Seif 2 states the ordinary standing of סתם יינם: drinking forbidden, benefit not. Still, says the Mehaber, a corner must have been set aside for the deposit — קרן זוית — and the ט״ז explains that such a corner counts as a Jewish courtyard.
  2. The Rama turns the practice around. Where the Mehaber forbids drinking on one seal, the Rama reports that after the fact even that is permitted, that one need not recognise one's seal, nor open an inquiry — and he closes by pointing to Siman 118.
  3. The ש״ך immediately narrows it. This leniency assumes a seal. A barrel merely bunged enters the count only where the loss would be great.

4. Master grid B — what counts as a seal

Seifim 4 to 7 are the technical heart of the siman: they no longer say how many seals are needed, but what one is. Seif 4 lays down the definition, and seifim 5, 6 and 7 draw three applications from it.

The deviceThe Mehaber's wordingHow many sealsSource
A cover that is not tight, closed as anyone closes, plus clay « כיצד הוא חותם בתוך חותם סתם החבי׳ בכלי שאינו מהודק כדרך שסותמין כל אדם וטח בטיט הרי זה חותם א׳ » One שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ד
A tight cover, with clay smeared over it « היה כלי מהודק וטח עליו מלמעלה הרי זה חותם בתוך חותם » Two שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ד
The skin tied at its mouth; then its mouth turned inward and tied « וכן אם צר פי הנאד הרי זה חותם אחד הפך פי הנאד לתוכו וצר עליו הרי זה חותם בתוך חותם » One, then two שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ד
The general rule: whatever departs from custom « וכן כל שינוי שמשנה מדברים שאין דרך כל אדם הרי הם כחותם א׳ והטיחה או הקשירה חותם שני » One — the daubing or the tying makes the second שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ד
Two unusual knots « שני קשרים משונים הוי כשני חותמות » Two שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ה
Two letters written « שתי אותיות הוי כשני חותמות » Two שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ו
A stamped die, however many letters it bears « והדפוסים אף על פי שיש בהם כמה אותיות לא חשיבי אלא כחותם אחד כיון שקובעין אותם בבת אחת » One only — it goes on in a single stroke שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ו
Where writing is no longer rare « ובמקום שמצויים מומרים ועובדי כוכבים שיודעים לכתוב אין כתב סימן אלא למי שמכיר הכתב » Writing is a mark only for one who knows the hand שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ו
A key and a seal « מפתח וחותם אחד הוי כשני חותמות » Two שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ז
💡 One test underneath all eight cases: a seal is whatever cannot be remade without trouble. The ט״ז says so of the knot: « דקשר שעושין בעלמא ודאי אין טורח כלל להתירה אלא ודאי קשר משונה בעינן » (ט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ח). An ordinary knot is untied and retied exactly as it was, so it proves nothing. An unusual knot cannot be reproduced by a bystander — and that alone makes the seal. The same logic explains why a stamped die, however ornate, counts as one: it goes on in a single motion.

⚖ The fastening one has to undo every day

The ש״ך reports, in the name of the משאת בנימין, a haulage question that has stayed exemplary: wagon covers are lashed with so intricate a knot that none could be more unusual — and it is still not a seal. The reason: summary: what we rely on in an unusual knot or a seal is that he does not take the trouble to forge, or else that he is afraid; whereas here the carrier is bound to untie the lashings and open the wagons every day in order to take out his own food (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ח).

A device that gets opened anyway in the normal course of the journey is no seal, however intricate. That is the test of the siman, applied to the letter.

5. The vessel: clay, wood, skin

Seif 1 does not merely fix the number: it adds that the number holds only for certain containers. A seal closes a mouth; it does not close a wall that can be pierced.

« והני מילי בחבית של חרס אבל לא בחבית של עץ מפני שיכולין להוציא יין מבין הנסרים ולא ירגישו » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א).

« וכל שכן בנודות שבקל יכולים להוציא יין מבין התפירות » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א).

And the Mehaber sees only one remedy: « ואין להם תקנה אלא שיכניס כל החבית של עץ או כל הנאד בשק שאין בו תפירה מבחוץ ויחתום פי השק » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א).

■ THE MEHABER — a wooden barrel and a skin fall outside the regime of seals; they must be put whole into a sack with no outer stitching, and the mouth of the sack sealed.
↓ the Rama brings the other view, and the custom
■ THE RAMA — « ויש מתירין אפילו בחבית של עץ ואין חוששין שמא יוציא בין הנסרים » (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:א), and so is the custom: « וכן נוהגים ובלבד שיזהר שיהא המגופה נסתם כראוי » (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:א).
↓ but the custom comes with two material conditions
■ THE TWO CONDITIONS — the bung properly closed, and no tap: « וכן שלא יהיה שם ברזא רק יחתוך כל הברזות » (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:א); then leather over the bung, with letters written half on the leather and half on the wood.

The Rama's stratagem is worth pausing over: « ויכתוב אותיות חציין על העור וחציין על הברזות שאם יגביה העובד כוכבים העור לא ידע לחזור ולכוון העור כבתחילה » (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:א).

💡 Why the taps have to be cut off: a tap is a standing way in that leaves no trace. It is the opposite of a seal. The ש״ך makes that condition the only truly blocking one: summary: the rest of the arrangement is not indispensable but a further precaution, and after the fact one seal is enough even in a wooden barrel (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ב); but if he did not cut off the taps it is forbidden even after the fact, since he can easily pull out the tap and draw off wine (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ב).

⚖ The stricter custom reported by the ש״ך and the ט״ז

Both report, in the name of the ב״ח, a custom well beyond the text: « עכשיו נוהגים שלא להתיר לשלוח יין כלל בחבית של עץ מעיר לעיר אם לא ע״י נאמן ישראל שומר ביום ובלילה » (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק א).

The ground is empirical: casks get bored with a small drill or a knife between the boards, and the theft goes unnoticed. The ש״ך at once notes that this custom holds לכתחלה, and that after the fact one permits as the Rama does.

The ט״ז draws a consequence worth recording: « ומשמע מכאן דאם היה ברור שהוציא יין מבין הנסרים דאסור » (ט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק א). The Rama's permission bears on the suspicion, never on an established fact.

And should a knife be found stuck in the barrel, the Rama does not settle it here: he refers to Siman 124.

6. A seal found broken or unrecognised (seif 8)

Seif 8 is the seif of the arrival: the wine is here, one looks at the seal, and what one sees decides.

« חתמו בשני חותמות וחזר עליו ולא הכירו או שמצאו סתור אסור » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ח).

What is found on arrivalThe wordingRulingSource
Seals unrecognisable, or found undone« חתמו בשני חותמות וחזר עליו ולא הכירו או שמצאו סתור אסור »Forbiddenשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ח
Undone by accident — of itself, by an animal, by a child« ודוקא אם רואים שנסתר בכוונה ע״י אדם אבל במקום שיכולים לתלות שנסתר ונתקלקל מעצמו או ע״י בהמה או תינוקת שלא בכוונה מותר בדיעבד »Permitted after the factרמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ח
Undone deliberately, but a Jew kept going in and out« ואפילו אם נתקלקל בכוונה יש להתיר אם ישראל יוצא ונכנס תמיד »There is ground to permitרמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ח
Is one even obliged to go and check?« אבל אינו צריך לחזור עליו אלא אם כן הודיע לישראל שנשתלח לו שהוא חתום בשני חותמות »No, unless he had announced itשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ח
The Mehaber's advice nonetheless« ומכל מקום נכון הדבר להודיעו צורת החותם כדי שיחזור אחריו »It is right to describe the seal to the recipientשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ח
Unless letters were written on it« מיהו אם כתב עליו אותיות אין צריך להודיעו דסתם עובד כוכבים אינו בקי לכתוב אותיות »No need to give noticeרמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ח
The non-Jew admits touching the wine while tightening the barrel« ואם העובד כוכבים אומר שהחבית היה מטפטף והוא הדקו ונגע ביין אינו נאמן לאסרו »He is not believed to forbid itרמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ח
⚠ The limit set by the פתחי תשובה: the Rama's leniency about a seal accidentally undone is not general. Reporting a ruling of the נודע ביהודה about a wagon overturned on the road, he specifies: « היינו במקום שיש לתלות שהעובד כוכבים לא הרגיש ולא ידע כלל שנסתר החותם » (פתחי תשובה יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ב). That is: if the non-Jew knew the seal had come apart, then even though it came apart accidentally, the wine knowingly stayed unsealed in his hands — and we are back to a deposit with no seal at all.

The same demand already appears at seif 2, where the ש״ך sets aside a seal damaged unintentionally: « ודוקא כשנראה שנסתר בכוונה ע״י אדם » (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ה).

7. A house rented or bought inside a non-Jew's courtyard (seif 9)

From seif 9 on, the wine no longer travels: it is at somebody's place. And the siman switches grids. The seal no longer decides; the non-Jew's tie to the place does.

« ישראל ששכר או קנה בית בחצרו של עובד כוכבים ומילאו יין אם ישראל דר שם ואף על פי שהניח היין בחצר ואין עליו לא חותם ולא מפתח מותר » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ט).

The situationRulingThe reasonSource
The Jew lives in the rented house — with no seal or key, and even if the non-Jew lives in that same courtyardPermittedHis presence takes the place of any deviceשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ט
What the ש״ך adds on this caseThe wine counts as guarded« ואין לעובד כוכבים שייכות ביין אע״פ שיש לו שייכות בבית בחזקת משתמר הוא »ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק י
The Jew does not live there, but holds key and sealPermitted« אם היה ביד ישראל המפתח וחותם מותר וא״צ לומר שני חותמות »שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ט
What we ourselves practiseOne seal alone is enough after the fact« ולדידן בחותם לבד מותר בדיעבד »ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק י״א
Neither living there, nor key, nor seal — and the non-Jew lives in the courtyardForbiddenThe place is his, and nothing holds him backשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ט
The non-Jew does not live in the courtyardPermitted« ואם אינו דר בחצר מותר אא״כ נמצא עומד בצד היין »שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ט
But he is found standing beside the wineForbidden here — unlike Siman 128« הטעם שאין נתפס כגנב שאדם עשוי לראות מה ששכר או מכר ואין השוכר או הלוקח מקפיד עליו »ט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ט
💡 The hinge of seif 9: because the Jew rented or bought from this very non-Jew, the latter keeps a claim to look in on what he sold or let. He is therefore no complete stranger to the place, and his standing beside the wine can no longer be put down to sheer trespass. The ט״ז words it exactly so, and that is what separates our seif from Siman 128, where a non-Jew with no tie at all to the place stays permitted even when found standing beside the wine.

8. The Jew's own courtyard: the thief, by day and by night (seif 10)

Seif 10 opens with a במה דברים אמורים that restricts the whole of seif 9: what came before holds only for a house taken from a non-Jew.

« אבל בחצרו של ישראל ממש שלא לקחו ולא שכרו מעובד כוכבים אפי׳ היה עובד כוכבים דר באותו חצר ואין ישראל דר בו מותר » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:י).

And the ground is remarkably strong: « לפי שאין לו בה שום שייכות ואפילו נמצא עומד בצד היין שהרי מכ״מ נתפס עליו כגנב » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:י).

⚖ The reversal, and its one exception

In a courtyard that is truly the Jew's, a non-Jew who comes near the wine has no title to be there at all: he would be seized as a thief. That is enough — with no key, no seal, and even when found standing beside the wine. The ש״ך refers here to Siman 128: summary: and it is permitted, as was stated above in siman 128 seif 4 (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ט״ו).

But the Mehaber closes it again at once: « וה״מ ביום אבל בלילה אסור » (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:י). By night nobody will walk in, and the dread of being caught falls away.

The Rama then circumscribes that nocturnal stringency with a precision worth reading slowly: « אבל בשאר מקומות דאמרינן לעיל סימן קכ״ח וקכ״ט דהעובד כוכבים מרתת אין חילוק בין יום ללילה » (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:י).

And he gives the ground proper to our seif: « הואיל והעובד כוכבים יש לו שייכות בחצר ומסתמא נועלו בלילה הואיל ואין ישראל דר שם ואינו מרתת כולי האי » (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:י).

Situation in the Jewish courtyardBy dayBy nightSource
The courtyard is not lockedPermittedForbiddenשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:י
Locked, with no hole or crack through which the wine can be seenForbiddenForbiddenרמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:י
Locked, but a hole or crack lets one seePermittedForbiddenרמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:י
The door standing wide openPermittedPermitted — he dreads someone comingט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק י

The Rama's wording on the two middle rows: « ולכן אפילו ביום אם נעל ואין חור או סדק שיכולין לראות היין אסור אבל ע״י חור וסדק מותר ביום אפילו נעלו בודאי » (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:י).

The ט״ז rescues the night in one case: « אבל בפתוח הדלת לגמרי מותר אפילו בלילה דמרתת דילמא השתא מדכיר ליה לחמרא ויבוא » (ט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק י).

💡 What the ש״ך adds, and what gets forgotten: even in the Jew's own courtyard, the seif assumes that the Jew comes by. summary: in any event the Jew goes in and out there; for if he did not go in and out at all, or even if he told him he was going far off, it would be no better than leaving a non-Jew in his shop, which is forbidden (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק י״ד). The regime of the thief does not, then, dispense with everything: it dispenses with the seal, not with a coming and going.

9. מרתת — the hidden spring of simanim 128, 129 and 130

One word runs through all three simanim, and it explains why they do not resemble one another. The non-Jew holds back because he dreads being caught. The whole question is what, in any given setting, produces that dread.

The simanWhat holds the non-Jew backWhat abolishes it
128 — a non-Jew left alone where there is wineThe Jew may walk in at any momentBeing told of a long absence
129 — wine left in his hands, and the Jew who comes and goesUnpredictable comings and goingsThose comings and goings ceasing to be unpredictable
130 — sealed wine, seifim 1 to 8No longer dread but trouble: remaking the seal costs too muchA device he has to open anyway
130 — wine left standing, seifim 9 and 10Title over the place: he would be taken for a thiefNight, and the key he holds himself

The ש״ך names both springs side by side, and this is the line to carry away from the whole siman: « דמאי דסמכינן אקשר משונה או חותם היינו משום דלא טרח ומזייף א״נ מרתת » (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ח).

⚠ The division the Rama draws at seif 10: where מרתת is what operates — simanim 128 and 129 — day and night are alike, since dread does not sleep. Here, where the non-Jew holds a title over the courtyard and locks it himself, night gives him back his ease: he is no longer מרתת כולי האי. Blurring the two regimes leads straight to importing into siman 130 a leniency belonging only to the two before it.

10. The cross-reference to Siman 118: sealing beyond wine

The Rama ends seif 2 with a pointer that should not be dropped — « ועיין לעיל סימן קי״ח » — and the ש״ך says of seif 3 as a whole that it was already set out at the opening of that siman: summary: the entire seif was explained above at the beginning of siman 118 (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ו).

Siman 118 is indeed the general siman of the sealed deposit, and ours is only its application to wine. It lays down the list: « יין ובשר וחתיכת דג שאין בו סימן שהפקיד או שלח ביד עובד כוכבים צריך שני חותמות » (שו״ע יו״ד קי״ח:א).

And at once the opposite list: « אבל יין מבושל ושכר או יין שעירבו בו דברים אחרים כגון דבש וכן החומץ וחלב ומורייס ופת וגבינה וכל שאיסורו מדברי סופרים שהפקידו ביד עובד כוכבים מותר בחותם אחד » (שו״ע יו״ד קי״ח:א).

What Siman 118 suppliesWhat Siman 130 makes of it
The list of foods needing two seals — wine, meat, a piece of fish with no distinguishing markSeif 1 applies the rule to wine, and adds the question of the vessel
The list of foods needing one seal — cooked wine, beer, mixed wine, vinegar, milk, bread, cheese, and every rabbinic prohibitionSeif 3 takes up the half that bears on wine: cooked, mixed, vinegar
« כיון שהחתימו כראוי שני חותמות בדברים שצריך שנים ואחד בדברים שדי באחד אין צריך לחזור אחריו לראותו » (שו״ע יו״ד קי״ח:ב)Seif 8 is that very teaching, and Siman 118 says so itself in a note
The difference between מפקיד and שולח — one who will see his seal again, and one who will notIt accounts for the Rama's leniency at seif 2 about a single seal
💡 How to hold the two simanim together: Siman 118 states the law of the seal for all of kashrut; Siman 130 specialises it to wine, where two things come in that Siman 118 has no need to treat — the fear of ניסוך, which calls for two seals where the fear of a swap alone would settle for one, and the porosity of a wine vessel. To study 130 without 118 is to learn the exception before the rule.

11. Practical cases

The questions below arise today in exactly the terms of the siman. The table states what the siman supplies for working them through — it does not settle them.

The questionWhat the siman suppliesSeif
A pallet of kosher wine carried by a non-Jewish driver, with nobody accompanying itThis is the central case of seif 1: two seals, and the question of the container. The ש״ך and the ט״ז further report the strict custom of shipping wine from town to town only with a Jewish guard by day and by night1
Do a printed capsule or a factory foil amount to one seal, or two?Seif 6 treats precisely the object applied in a single motion, however many letters it bears — and counts it as one seal only6
A tamper seal that has to be broken at every stage of the haul anywayThe ש״ך, in the name of the משאת בנימין, rules out a fastening one is bound to undo daily: it is no seal4
מבושל wine — cooked or pasteurised — left with a non-Jewish warehousemanSeif 3 places it among what settles for a single seal, and points implicitly to Siman 118 for the general rule3
On delivery the tamper seal is broken and the carrier says the pallet fell overThe Rama permits after the fact whatever came undone unintentionally; the פתחי תשובה confines that leniency to a case where the non-Jew did not notice8
A cellar rented in a building whose non-Jewish owner keeps a spare set of keysSeif 9 handles premises taken from a non-Jew: key and seal in Jewish hands, living on the spot, and the case of his being found beside the wine9
Premises belonging to the Jew himself, into which a non-Jewish workman or courier comesSeif 10: he has no שייכות over the place and would be taken for a thief — but the ש״ך assumes the Jew goes in and out10
⚠ This table is no ruling. Whether an industrial closure amounts to one seal or two, the standing of pasteurised wine, the status of the non-Jew in later authorities — each of these has a literature of its own, which this level does not claim to lay out. What the synthesis gives is the categories in which such questions arise.

For halacha le-ma'aseh, ask your Rav.

12. The 7 golden rules

  1. Ordinary wine: two seals. That is the law of seif 1, and it rests on the risk of touching, not on the risk of theft (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א).
  2. Whatever touching no longer forbids: one seal. Cooked wine, wine mixed with honey or oil, vinegar — only the fear of a swap remains (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ג).
  3. One seal on ordinary wine: forbidden to drink, permitted for benefit — and the Rama reports that after the fact even drinking is permitted (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ב ; רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ב).
  4. A seal is whatever cannot be remade without trouble. An ordinary knot is not one, an unusual knot is, and a stamped die counts as one only (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ד ; שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ו).
  5. The vessel weighs as much as the seal. A wall that can be pierced without touching the seal empties the seal of meaning (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א).
  6. A seal broken by accident does not condemn — unless the non-Jew knew of it (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ח ; פתחי תשובה יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ב).
  7. Once wine sits somewhere, stop counting seals and measure a tie to the place: שייכות, נתפס עליו כגנב, day and night (שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ט ; שו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:י).

13. Mnemonic — the memory aid « חותם »

ח־ו־ת־ם — the four letters of the word חותם
The ladder of devices — strongest to weakest

14. The 5 classic pitfalls

❌ Pitfall 1 — Counting seals without looking at the vessel: seif 1 binds the two in one breath. A wooden barrel or a skin lets wine be drawn between the boards or the stitches while the seal never moves. The Rama permits and the custom follows — but with the bung properly closed and every tap cut off, and the ש״ך makes that second condition the only one that blocks even after the fact.
❌ Pitfall 2 — Taking a seal for a lock: it prevents nothing. It makes forgery too costly — לא טרח ומזייף — or too risky — מרתת. Hence the surprising consequence: a very intricate lashing that has to be undone daily is worth nothing, while a plain unusual knot, which nobody could remake, is worth a seal.
❌ Pitfall 3 — Reading “permitted for benefit” as leave to drink: seif 2 permits benefit and forbids drinking. That is indeed a leniency, but about something else. Leniency about drinking comes afterwards, from the Rama, and only after the fact — « ויש שכתבו דבדיעבד יש להתיר אפילו בחותם אחד » (רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ב) — and the ש״ך still requires that a genuine seal was there.
❌ Pitfall 4 — Extending to siman 130 the equality of day and night: the Rama expressly reserves it for simanim 128 and 129, where מרתת is what operates. In the courtyard of seif 10, where the non-Jew holds a title and locks up himself, night changes everything — and so does day, if he locked up leaving no crack to see through.
❌ Pitfall 5 — Forgetting that seif 10 assumes a coming and going: the phrase נתפס עליו כגנב is readily remembered as though it dispensed with everything. The ש״ך warns that the seif still assumes the Jew goes in and out; without that, we fall back under the law of a non-Jew left alone in the shop, which is forbidden (ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק י״ד).

For halacha le-ma'aseh, ask your Rav.

15. Recap of all 10 seifim — one line each

SeifSubjectThe essentials
1Depositing and shipping wineIt is permitted to deposit or ship wine by the hand of a non-Jew if it is sealed with a seal within a seal, or with a key and a seal. And that in an earthenware barrel, not in a wooden one, since wine can be drawn between the boards unnoticed — and all the more so in skins, where it is easily drawn between the stitches. Their only remedy is to put the whole wooden barrel or the whole skin into a sack with no outer stitching and seal the mouth of the sack. Rama: some permit even a wooden barrel, without fearing that he will draw wine between the boards, and such is the custom — provided one takes care that the bung is properly closed and that there be no tap: let him cut off all the taps, put leather over the bung, and write letters half on the leather and half on the wood, so that if he lifts the leather he will not know how to set it back. And if a knife was found in the barrel, see Siman 124.
2The single sealIf he deposited it with a non-Jew under one seal: forbidden to drink, permitted for benefit — and that provided a corner was set aside for it. Rama: some have written that after the fact one permits even with a single seal; and one need not recognise one's seal unless one sees that it is damaged, in which case it is forbidden; but one need not investigate the matter, and the custom is lenient — and see above, Siman 118.
3What settles for one sealOur cooked wine, likewise our wine mixed with other things such as honey and oil, and likewise our vinegar: it is permitted to deposit them with a non-Jew under a single seal.
4What a seal within a seal isStopping the barrel with a vessel that is not tight, as everyone stops it, and daubing clay: that is one seal. If the vessel was tight and he daubed over it from above: that is a seal within a seal. Likewise if he tied the mouth of the skin: one seal; if he turned the mouth of the skin inward and tied over it: a seal within a seal. And likewise any change departing from what everyone does counts as one seal — and the daubing or the tying is the second.
5KnotsTwo unusual knots count as two seals.
6Writing and the stamped dieTwo letters count as two seals. And stamped dies, though they bear several letters, count as one seal only, since they are set on all at once. And where apostates and non-Jews who know how to write are common, writing is a mark only for one who knows the hand.
7The keyA key and one seal count as two seals.
8The seal on returnHe sealed it with two seals, then went back over it and did not recognise them, or found them undone: forbidden. Rama: and that only if we see they were undone deliberately by a person; but where one can put it down to their having come apart of themselves, or through an animal or a child unintentionally — it is permitted after the fact; and even if they were undone deliberately there is ground to permit if a Jew was constantly going in and out. But he need not go back and check unless he had told the Jew to whom it was sent that it was sealed with two seals — and even without describing their form, once the second Jew found it sealed with two seals it is permitted; still, it is right to describe the form of the seal so that he can check it. Rama: however, if he wrote letters on it, no notice is needed, since an ordinary non-Jew is not skilled at writing letters. And if the non-Jew says the barrel was dripping, that he tightened it and touched the wine, he is not believed to forbid it, even if some wine is still visible outside and his words carry some indications.
9A house taken from a non-JewA Jew who rented or bought a house in a non-Jew's courtyard and filled it with wine: if the Jew lives there — even though he left the wine in the courtyard with neither seal nor key upon it — it is permitted, even if the non-Jew also lives in that courtyard. But if the Jew does not live there: if he holds the key and the seal, it is permitted, and there is no need to speak of two seals; if not, although the wine is in the very house he rented or bought, it is forbidden if the non-Jew lives in the courtyard; and if he does not live in the courtyard — it is permitted, unless he is found standing beside the wine.
10The Jew's courtyard, day and nightThat applies to one who rents or buys a house in a non-Jew's courtyard; but in a Jew's own courtyard, which he neither bought nor rented from a non-Jew, even if a non-Jew lives in that courtyard and no Jew lives in it, it is permitted, although the Jew holds neither key nor seal, since he has no title in it whatsoever; and even if he is found standing beside the wine, for he would in any case be seized as a thief. And that is by day; by night it is forbidden. Rama: and only in such a case is it forbidden by night, whereas in the other settings where we said above at simanim 128 and 129 that the non-Jew is afraid, there is no difference between day and night; here it is otherwise, since the non-Jew holds a title in the courtyard and presumably locks it at night, no Jew living there, and he is not so much afraid. Therefore even by day, if he locked up and there is no hole or crack through which the wine can be seen, it is forbidden; but through a hole or a crack it is permitted by day, even if he certainly locked up; and by night it is forbidden in such a case even where nothing is known — and that is the difference between day and night.

16. Final flash card

QuestionReflex answerSource
How many seals for ordinary wine given to a non-Jew?Two — a seal within a seal, or a key and a sealשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א
And for cooked wine, mixed wine, vinegar?Oneשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ג
One seal on ordinary wine?Forbidden to drink, permitted for benefit; and the Rama permits after the factשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ב ; רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ב
Does a plain bung count for that single seal?No — save where loss is greatש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ד
A wooden barrel, a skin?The Mehaber rules them out; the Rama permits and custom follows — bung closed, taps cut offשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:א ; רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:א
Does a knot make a seal?Only if it is unusual; two unusual knots count as two sealsשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ה ; ט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ח
A stamped die covered in letters?One seal — it goes on all at onceשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ו
A key plus a seal?Two sealsשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ז
The seal is found undone on arrival?Forbidden if undone deliberately by a person; permitted after the fact if it came apart accidentallyשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ח ; רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ח
And if the non-Jew knew the seal had come apart?The leniency falls awayפתחי תשובה יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק ב
The non-Jew claims he touched the wine while stopping a leak?He is not believed to forbid itרמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:ח
A house rented from a non-Jew, the Jew living in it?Permitted, with no seal and no keyשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ט
He does not live there, but holds key and seal?Permitted — and for us one seal alone is enough after the factשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:ט ; ש״ך יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק י״א
A courtyard genuinely the Jew's, a non-Jew living in it?Permitted by day, even found standing beside the wine — he would be taken for a thiefשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:י
And by night?Forbidden — the one spot in the whole block where day and night part companyשו״ע יו״ד ק״ל:י ; רמ״א יו״ד ק״ל:י
The door standing wide open, at night?Permitted — he dreads that somebody may walk inט״ז יו״ד ק״ל ס״ק י

⚖ The reflex in 3 questions

  1. Is the wine travelling, or standing? Travelling — count seals. Standing — qualify the place.
  2. Can the device be remade without trouble? If so, it is no seal, whatever it looks like.
  3. What holds the non-Jew back? The trouble of remaking, the dread of being caught, or being seized as a thief. On that answer, night changes everything or nothing.
For halacha le-ma'aseh, ask your Rav.

🎓 Recap of the study path

LevelContentOutcome
🌱 Level 1 — Base The text of all 10 seifim, translation, step-by-step explanation Overall understanding
Level 2 — Lamdan The definition of חותם — לא טרח ומזייף or מרתת, the meaning of שינוי, and how sealing relates to שייכות over a place In-depth study
Level 3 — Synthesis Two master grids, the regime of place, מרתת, practical cases, golden rules, mnemonic, pitfalls and a recap of the seifim Practical mastery and review
📜 Level 4 — Halacha le-ma'aseh The practical ruling according to the ש״ך, the ט״ז, the פתחי תשובה and the poskim Contemporary application
💡 Suggested next steps:
📖 Sources for this siman on Sefaria:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
DAAT · הרב יוסף חיים סממה
תלמיד חכם · מעביר שיעורים בהלכה ובחסידות
סימן ק״ל · Level 3 — Synthesis / Review · דיני חתימת היין
daattorah.com

DAAT דעת — © 5786 / 2026 · Back to home · Siman ק״ל · ♥ Support

📖Join the chavruta