Orah Haïm ר״ו · Level 4 · שיטת אדמו״ר הזקן

דעת הרב

Level 4 — Daat HaRav (Alter Rebbe) — Siman ר״ו · דִּין הֶפְסֵק וְטָעוּת בְּבִרְכַּת הַפֵּרוֹת

The Alter Rebbe’s way on דִּין הֶפְסֵק וְטָעוּת בְּבִרְכַּת הַפֵּרוֹת : טָעָה בַּבְּרָכָה ; סְפֵק הָעֵץ אוֹ הָאֲדָמָה ; שֶׁהַכֹּל פּוֹטֵר אֶת הַכֹּל ; כַּוָּנָה לִפְטֹר ; הֶפְסֵק בֵּין בְּרָכָה לַאֲכִילָה ; בְּכָל לָשׁוֹן ; הַשְׁמָעָה לְאָזְנָיו ; נְקִיּוּת וְגִלּוּי הָרֹאשׁ ; אֲחִיזָה בְּיָמִין ; הֵבִיאוּ לְפָנָיו אַחַר הַבְּרָכָה ; נָפַל מִיָּדוֹ ; בְּרָכָה לְבַטָּלָה ; מַיִם בִּשְׁכוּנַת הַמֵּת וְהַתְּקוּפָה ; מַיִם הָרָעִים — in the Habad sensibility.

Why a Level 4 devoted to the Alter Rebbe ? The Alter Rebbe’s Shulchan Aruch is not a commentary on the Mehaber (מחבר) — it is a complete, self-standing Shulchan Aruch, written by the Alter Rebbe (Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi, founder of Habad, disciple of the Maggid (מגיד) of Mezeritch). Its singularity: it combines halakhah (הלכה) + טעמי המצוות + the inner dimension in a single work, and it rules with a uniquely talmudic sharpness.

For Habad, the Alter Rebbe is הפוסק האחרון — his psak is the deciding authority. This page gathers the Rav’s way on siman ר״ו — דִּין הֶפְסֵק וְטָעוּת בְּבִרְכַּת הַפֵּרוֹת (the law of interruption and error in the blessing over fruits), which unfolds in the Rav over ט״ו סְעִיפִים (fifteen seifim): from error in the blessing — haadama, which does cover a fruit of the tree, haetz, which does not cover a fruit of the ground, chehakol, which covers everything, even bread and wine — to the way out of doubt through haadama; from the intent to exempt a second fruit to the ban on interrupting between the blessing and the first mouthful, even for honour or reverent fear; from a blessing said in any language and made audible to one’s own ears, to the demands of place and body — cleanliness, ervah, a covered head; from the right hand that holds the food, and the knife that Kabbalah keeps away, to the long sugya of what is brought after the blessing — the same kind, another kind, a guest at his host’s table; from the fruit that falls from the hand and the man standing at the water channel, to one who blesses on behalf of others; down to the blessing said in vain and its repair, the water in the neighbourhood of the dead and the hour of the tekufah, and that closing question of order: the little water one pours out, before the blessing and never after.

→ Read the general preface on the Alter Rebbe’s shitah

Source note. The Hebrew text reproduced on this page is the complete, real text of the Alter Rebbe’s Shulchan Aruch, Orah Haim siman ר״וט״ו סְעִיפִים (fifteen seifim) from the Rav’s own hand — per the Kehot edition as digitized on Sefaria (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim ר״ו). The Alter Rebbe there treats the דִּין הֶפְסֵק וְטָעוּת בְּבִרְכַּת הַפֵּרוֹת. Note that the Mehaber devotes only six seifim to this siman: the Rav’s fifteen seifim are his own construction. The English translations are our own. No passage is cited outside this verifiable text.
1 · טקסט אדמו״ר הזקן

שולחן ערוך הרב — סימן ר״ו — דִּין הֶפְסֵק וְטָעוּת בְּבִרְכַּת הַפֵּרוֹת

The full text of the Alter Rebbe’s Shulchan Aruch

שולחן ערוך הרב, סימן ר״ו — דִּין הֶפְסֵק וְטָעוּת בְּבִרְכַּת הַפֵּרוֹת — וּבוֹ ט״ו סְעִיפִים
The Alter Rebbe’s own text (Sefaria source Shulchan_Arukh_HaRav,_Orach_Chayim.206), followed by our English translation. The siman comprises fifteen seifim (ט״ו סְעִיפִים ; seif k → ‎.206.k) — open each seif to read the Rav’s text.

סעיף א בֵּרַךְ הָאֲדָמָה עַל פְּרִי הָעֵץ — יָצָא ; הָעֵץ עַל פְּרִי הָאָרֶץ — לֹא יָצָא.

דִּין הֶפְסֵק וְטָעוּת בְּבִרְכַּת הַפֵּרוֹת, וּבוֹ ט״ו סְעִיפִים:
בֵּרַךְ עַל פֵּרוֹת הָאִילָן "בּוֹרֵא פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה" — יָצָא, הוֹאִיל וְעִקַּר הָאִילָן הוּא מִן הָאָרֶץ. אֲבָל אִם בֵּרַךְ עַל פֵּרוֹת הָאָרֶץ "בּוֹרֵא פְּרִי הָעֵץ" — לֹא יָצָא. לְפִיכָךְ, אִם הוּא מְסֻפָּק בִּפְרִי אִם הוּא פְּרִי עֵץ אוֹ פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה — יְבָרֵךְ "בּוֹרֵא פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה", וְיֵצֵא מִמַּה נַּפְשָׁךְ. וְעַל הַכֹּל אִם בֵּרַךְ "שֶׁהַכֹּל נִהְיָה בִּדְבָרוֹ" — יָצָא, וַאֲפִלּוּ עַל פַּת וְיַיִן.
וְכָל זֶה בְּדִיעֲבַד, אֲבָל לְכַתְּחִלָּה צָרִיךְ לְבָרֵךְ עַל כָּל דָּבָר בִּרְכָתוֹ הַמְּיֻחֶדֶת לוֹ, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן נוֹלַד לוֹ סָפֵק אַחַר שֶׁלָּמַד כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן [ר״ב] :

The law of interruption and of error in the blessing over fruits, comprising fifteen seifim.
If he blessed borei pri haadama over fruits of the tree — he has fulfilled his obligation, since the tree itself is rooted in the ground. But if he blessed borei pri haetz over fruits of the ground — he has not fulfilled it. Therefore, if he is in doubt about a fruit, not knowing whether it is fruit of the tree or fruit of the ground — let him bless borei pri haadama, and he is covered mimah nafshakh. And over everything, if he blessed chehakol nihya bidvaro — he has fulfilled his obligation, and even over bread and over wine.
And all this is only bediavad; but lekhathila one must bless over each thing the blessing that belongs to it, unless a doubt arose for him after he had learned, as is explained in siman ר״ב (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim ר״ב).

סעיף ב בֵּרַךְ עַל פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה — אֵין פְּרִי הָעֵץ נִפְטָר, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן נִתְכַּוֵּן.

הָיוּ לְפָנָיו פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה וּפְרִי הָעֵץ וּבֵרַךְ תְּחִלָּה עַל פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה — צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ עַל פְּרִי הָעֵץ, כִּי לֹא נִפְטַר בְּבִרְכַּת "בּוֹרֵא פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה" אֶלָּא כְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ עָלָיו וְלֹא כְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ עַל פְּרִי הָאֲדָמָה.
בַּמֶּה דְּבָרִים אֲמוּרִים? בִּמְבָרֵךְ בִּסְתָם, אֲבָל אִם נִתְכַּוֵּן לִפְטֹר בְּבִרְכָתוֹ גַּם פְּרִי הָעֵץ — יָצָא, וַאֲפִלּוּ לֹא הָיוּ פְּרִי הָעֵץ עֲדַיִן לְפָנָיו כְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ וְאַחַר כָּךְ הֱבִיאוּהוּ לְפָנָיו:

He had before him a fruit of the ground and a fruit of the tree, and he blessed first over the fruit of the ground — he must go back and bless over the fruit of the tree, for it was not exempted by the blessing borei pri haadama: that blessing exempts it only when he said it over the fruit of the tree itself, and not when he said it over the fruit of the ground.
In what case is this said? Of one who blesses without particular intent; but if he intended to exempt with his blessing the fruit of the tree as well — he has fulfilled his obligation, and even if the fruit of the tree was not yet before him when he blessed and was brought before him afterwards.

סעיף ג אֵין מַפְסִיקִין בֵּין הַבְּרָכָה לַאֲכִילָה — וּשְׁהִיָּה לְצֹרֶךְ אֲכִילָה אֵינָהּ הֶפְסֵק.

כָּל אֵלּוּ הַבְּרָכוֹת צָרִיךְ שֶׁלֹּא יַפְסִיק בֵּין הַבְּרָכָה לַאֲכִילָה, אֲפִלּוּ מִפְּנֵי הַכָּבוֹד וְהַיִּרְאָה. וְאִם הִפְסִיק וְדִבֵּר דִּבּוּר שֶׁאֵינוֹ לְצֹרֶךְ הָאֲכִילָה — צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן קס״ז.
וַאֲפִלּוּ בִּשְׁתִיקָה אָסוּר לְהַפְסִיק יוֹתֵר מִכְּדֵי דִּבּוּר, שֶׁהוּא כְּדֵי שְׁאֵלַת שָׁלוֹם תַּלְמִיד לָרַב, שֶׁהֵן ג׳ תֵּבוֹת אֵלּוּ: "שָׁלוֹם עָלֶיךָ רַבִּי". וְאִם שָׁהָה יוֹתֵר — אֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ. וּשְׁהִיָּה שֶׁהִיא לְצֹרֶךְ אֲכִילָה — אֵינָהּ חֲשׁוּבָה הֶפְסֵק כְּלָל אֲפִלּוּ לְכַתְּחִלָּה. לְפִיכָךְ, הַמְבָרֵךְ עַל הַפְּרִי וְחוֹתֵךְ מִמֶּנּוּ וְאוֹכֵל — לֹא יַחְתֹּךְ עַד אַחַר הַבְּרָכָה, כְּדֵי שֶׁיְּבָרֵךְ עַל הַשָּׁלֵם לְמִצְוָה מִן הַמֻּבְחָר, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן קס״ח. וְאֵין לָחֹשׁ לְהֶפְסֵק שְׁהִיַּת הַחִתּוּךְ בֵּין הַבְּרָכָה לַאֲכִילָה, הוֹאִיל וְהוּא צֹרֶךְ אֲכִילָה.
וּמִכָּל מָקוֹם, הָאוֹכֵל אֱגוֹז וְכַיּוֹצֵא בּוֹ — יִשְׁבְּרֶנּוּ וְאַחַר כָּךְ יְבָרֵךְ, כִּי שֶׁמָּא הִתְלִיעַ בְּתוֹכוֹ אוֹ נִרְקַב, וְנִמְצָא בֵּרַךְ לְבַטָּלָה:

All these blessings: one must not interrupt between the blessing and the eating, not even out of honour or out of reverent fear. And if he did interrupt and spoke a word that was not needed for the eating — he must go back and bless, as is explained in siman קס״ז (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim קס״ז).
And even in silence it is forbidden to interrupt for longer than kdei dibbur, which is the time of a student’s greeting to his master, those three words: shalom alekha rabbi. And if he did tarry longer — he need not go back and bless. And a delay that is a need of the eating is not reckoned an interruption at all, even lekhathila. Therefore, one who blesses over the fruit, cuts a piece from it and eats — let him not cut before the blessing, so that he may bless over the whole fruit, lemitzvah min hamuvchar, as is explained in siman קס״ח (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim קס״ח). And there is no concern for the interruption of the time taken to cut, between the blessing and the eating, since it is a need of the eating.
And nevertheless, one who eats a nut or the like — let him break it first and bless afterwards, for perhaps it is worm-eaten inside or rotten, and he would be found to have blessed in vain.

סעיף ד כָּל הַבְּרָכוֹת נֶאֱמָרוֹת בְּכָל לָשׁוֹן.

כָּל הַבְּרָכוֹת נֶאֱמָרוֹת בְּכָל לָשׁוֹן. וְאִם צָרִיךְ לְהָבִין הַבְּרָכוֹת — נִתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן קפ״ה:

All blessings may be said in any language. And whether one must understand the blessings — that has been explained in siman קפ״ה (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim קפ״ה).

סעיף ה יַשְׁמִיעַ לְאָזְנָיו — וְאִם לֹא הִשְׁמִיעַ יָצָא, וּבִלְבַד שֶׁהוֹצִיא בִּשְׂפָתָיו.

וְצָרִיךְ שֶׁיַּשְׁמִיעַ לְאָזְנָיו. וְאִם לֹא הִשְׁמִיעַ — יָצָא, וּבִלְבַד שֶׁיּוֹצִיא בִּשְׂפָתָיו, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן קפ״ה:

And he must make it audible to his ears. And if he did not make it audible — he has fulfilled his obligation, provided he articulated it with his lips, as is explained in siman קפ״ה (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim קפ״ה).

סעיף ו צוֹאָה וְעֶרְוָה בִּשְׁעַת הַבְּרָכָה — כִּקְרִיאַת שְׁמַע.

וְצָרִיךְ לִזָּהֵר מִצּוֹאָה וּמֵי רַגְלַיִם וְגִלּוּי עֶרְוָה וְלִבּוֹ רוֹאֶה אֶת הָעֶרְוָה, כְּמוֹ בִּקְרִיאַת שְׁמַע. וְהָאִשָּׁה מֻתֶּרֶת לֵישֵׁב עֲרֻמָּה וּלְבָרֵךְ, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁבִּישִׁיבָתָהּ פָּנֶיהָ שֶׁל מַטָּה מְכֻסִּים בַּקַּרְקַע אוֹ בַּסַּפְסָל שֶׁהִיא יוֹשֶׁבֶת עָלָיו, וּבְיַרְכוֹתֶיהָ כְּשֶׁתַּשְׁוֶה רַגְלֶיהָ וְתֶאֱסֹף אוֹתָן זוֹ לָזוֹ, מַה שֶּׁאֵין כֵּן בְּאִישׁ שֶׁהַגִּיד וְהַבֵּיצִים בּוֹלְטִים וְנִרְאִים:

And one must be careful of excrement, of urine, of uncovered ervah, and of his heart seeing the ervah — as with the reading of Shema. And a woman is permitted to sit unclothed and bless, because in her sitting posture her lower parts are covered by the ground, or by the bench on which she sits, and by her thighs when she brings her legs level and draws them together one against the other — which is not so with a man, whose member and testicles protrude and are visible.

סעיף ז אֵין לְבָרֵךְ בְּגִלּוּי הָרֹאשׁ.

אֵין לְבָרֵךְ בְּגִלּוּי הָרֹאשׁ, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן צ״א:

One should not bless bareheaded, as is explained in siman צ״א (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim צ״א).

סעיף ח אוֹחֵז בִּימִינוֹ אֶת מַה שֶּׁמְּבָרֵךְ עָלָיו — וְלֹא עַל יְדֵי סַכִּין.

כָּל דָּבָר שֶׁמְּבָרֵךְ עָלָיו לְאָכְלוֹ אוֹ לְהָרִיחַ בּוֹ אוֹ לַעֲשׂוֹת בּוֹ מִצְוָה — צָרִיךְ לֶאֱחֹז בִּימִינוֹ כְּשֶׁהוּא מְבָרֵךְ.
וְיֵשׁ מִי שֶׁאוֹמֵר, שֶׁעַל דֶּרֶךְ הַקַּבָּלָה אֵין לִתְחֹב הַפְּרִי שֶׁמְּבָרֵךְ עָלָיו בְּסַכִּין וְלֶאֱחֹז הַסַּכִּין בִּימִינוֹ, כִּי הֵם ב׳ הֲפָכִים בְּנוֹשֵׂא אֶחָד, שֶׁהַיָּמִין מִמֶּנָּה "תּוֹצְאוֹת חַיִּים", וְהַסַּכִּין הוּא כֹּחוֹ שֶׁל עֵשָׂו הַמְקַצֵּר חַיִּים, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן ק״פ:

Anything over which he blesses in order to eat it, or to smell it, or to perform a mitzvah with it — he must hold it in his right hand while he blesses.
And there is one who says that, by way of Kabbalah, one should not spear with a knife the fruit over which he blesses and hold the knife in his right hand, for they are two opposites in a single subject: from the right hand come the issues of life, whereas the knife is the power of Esav, which shortens life, as is explained in siman ק״פ (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim ק״פ).

סעיף ט לֹא אֲחָזוֹ, וְדִין מַה שֶּׁהֵבִיאוּ לְפָנָיו אַחַר הַבְּרָכָה.

וְאִם לֹא אֲחָזוֹ כְּלָל, אִם הָיָה לְפָנָיו כְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ עָלָיו — יָצָא. וְאִם בֵּרַךְ וְאַחַר כָּךְ הֵבִיאוּ לְפָנָיו, אַף שֶׁבֵּרַךְ עַל דַּעַת כֵּן — צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ.
אֲבָל מִי שֶׁבֵּרַךְ עַל פֵּרוֹת שֶׁלְּפָנָיו וְאַחַר כָּךְ הֵבִיאוּ לוֹ יוֹתֵר מֵאוֹתוֹ הַמִּין, אוֹ מִמִּין אַחֵר שֶׁנִּפְטַר בַּבְּרָכָה הָרִאשׁוֹנָה, כְּגוֹן שֶׁבִּרְכוֹתֵיהֶם שָׁווֹת, אוֹ שֶׁהָרִאשׁוֹן עִקָּר וְהַשֵּׁנִי טָפֵל — אֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ, אֲפִלּוּ הֵבִיאוּ לְפָנָיו מִין הָאַחֵר אַחַר שֶׁכָּלָה הָרִאשׁוֹן, שֶׁכְּבָר אֲכָלוֹ כֻּלּוֹ.
וְהוּא שֶׁכְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ הָיָה דַּעְתּוֹ גַּם עַל הַשֵּׁנִי לְאָכְלוֹ, אֲפִלּוּ לֹא הָיָה בְּדַעְתּוֹ בְּפֵרוּשׁ לְפָטְרוֹ בִּבְרָכָה זוֹ, אֲבָל אִם לֹא הָיְתָה דַּעְתּוֹ עָלָיו בִּשְׁעַת הַבְּרָכָה — צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ, אִם כְּבָר אָכַל הָרִאשׁוֹן קֹדֶם שֶׁהֵבִיאוּ מִין הָאַחֵר לְפָנָיו. אֲבָל אִם יֵשׁ עֲדַיִן לְפָנָיו מִמִּין הָרִאשׁוֹן כְּשֶׁהֵבִיאוּ לְפָנָיו מִין אַחֵר הַדּוֹמֶה לְהָרִאשׁוֹן, כְּגוֹן שֶׁשְּׁנֵיהֶם מִינֵי פֵּרוֹת, אוֹ שֶׁשְּׁנֵיהֶם מִינֵי מַשְׁקִין — אֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ עָלָיו, שֶׁכָּל זְמַן שֶׁהוּא עוֹסֵק בַּאֲכִילַת אוֹ שְׁתִיַּת הָרִאשׁוֹן — אֵינוֹ עוֹשֶׂה הֶסַּח הַדַּעַת מִן הַסְּתָם, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן נִמְלַךְ מַמָּשׁ, לְפִי שֶׁכֵּן דַּרְכּוֹ שֶׁל אָדָם כְּשֶׁהוּא עוֹסֵק בַּאֲכִילָה אוֹ בִּשְׁתִיָּה, לְהִמָּשֵׁךְ בָּהּ וְלִגְרֹר מֵאֲכִילָה לַאֲכִילָה וּמִשְּׁתִיָּה לִשְׁתִיָּה.
אֲבָל אִם שׁוֹתֶה שֵׁכָר וְהֵבִיאוּ לוֹ דָּגִים לְמַתֵּק הַשְּׁתִיָּה, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהַכֹּל בְּרָכָה אַחַת, וְגַם הַדָּגִים הֵם טְפֵלִים לְהַשֵּׁכָר, שֶׁעַל יְדֵי כָּךְ שׁוֹתֶה יוֹתֵר — אֵינָם נִפְטָרִים בִּבְרָכָה אַחַת, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן הָיְתָה דַּעְתּוֹ עֲלֵיהֶם, אוֹ שֶׁהָיוּ לְפָנָיו בִּשְׁעַת בְּרָכָה, כְּמוֹ שֶׁיִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן רי״ב.
(וְאִם הֵבִיאוּ לְפָנָיו מֵאוֹתוֹ הַמִּין מַמָּשׁ, אַף אִם כְּבָר אָכַל הָרִאשׁוֹן כֻּלּוֹ — אֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן הוּא נִמְלַךְ מַמָּשׁ. אֲבָל בִּסְתָם אֵינוֹ עוֹשֶׂה הֶסַּח הַדַּעַת מִמִּין זֶה שֶׁהָיָה לְפָנָיו בִּשְׁעַת הַבְּרָכָה לִהְיוֹת נִמְנָע מִלְּאָכְלוֹ עוֹד כְּשֶׁיָּבִיאוּ לְפָנָיו, לְפִי שֶׁדַּרְכּוֹ שֶׁל אָדָם לְהִמָּשֵׁךְ בַּאֲכִילָה וּלְהַרְבּוֹת בָּהּ מֵאַחַר שֶׁהִתְחִיל בָּהּ).
וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים, שֶׁלֹּא אָמְרוּ כֵּן אֶלָּא בִּסְעוּדָה שֶׁאָדָם קוֹבֵעַ עַצְמוֹ בָּהּ, אֲבָל בְּפֵרוֹת וְכַיּוֹצֵא בָּהֶם, אַף אִם קוֹבֵעַ עַצְמוֹ בָּהֶם — אֵין קְבִיעָתוֹ כְּלוּם, שֶׁאֵין קֶבַע לְפֵרוֹת, וְכֵיוָן שֶׁלֹּא הָיְתָה דַּעְתּוֹ עַל מַה שֶּׁהֵבִיאוּ לְפָנָיו אַחַר הַבְּרָכָה, אַף שֶׁאֵינוֹ נִמְלַךְ מַמָּשׁ — צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ בְּכָל עִנְיָן, אַף אִם הֵבִיאוּ לוֹ מֵאוֹתוֹ הַמִּין מַמָּשׁ, וְלֹא אָכַל עֲדַיִן הָרִאשׁוֹן.
וּסְפֵק בְּרָכוֹת לְהָקֵל. וּמִכָּל מָקוֹם, לְכַתְּחִלָּה טוֹב לִזָּהֵר לִהְיוֹת דַּעְתּוֹ עַל כָּל מַה שֶּׁיָּבִיאוּ לוֹ.
וְאוֹרְחִים הַקְּרוּאִים לֶאֱכֹל מִינֵי פֵּרוֹת, כֵּיוָן שֶׁדַּעְתָּם עַל בַּעַל הַבַּיִת שֶׁזִּמְּנָם — הֲרֵי דַּעְתָּם עַל כָּל מַה שֶּׁהֵבִיא לִפְנֵיהֶם, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן קע״ט. וַאֲפִלּוּ הֵבִיא לִפְנֵיהֶם מִין אַחֵר אַחַר שֶׁכָּלָה הָרִאשׁוֹן — אֵין צְרִיכִים לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ:

And if he did not hold it at all: if it was before him when he blessed over it — he has fulfilled his obligation. But if he blessed and afterwards they brought it before him, even though he blessed with that in mind — he must go back and bless.
But one who blessed over fruits that were before him, and afterwards they brought him more of that same kind, or of another kind already exempted by the first blessing — for instance because their blessings are the same, or because the first is the principal and the second the subordinate — need not go back and bless, even if the other kind was brought before him after the first was gone, having already been eaten entirely.
And this is so provided that when he blessed his mind was also upon the second, to eat it, even if he did not explicitly intend to exempt it with this blessing; but if his mind was not upon it at the time of the blessing — he must go back and bless, if he already ate the first before the other kind was brought before him. But if there is still some of the first kind before him when they brought before him another kind resembling the first — for instance that both are kinds of fruit, or both kinds of drink — he need not go back and bless over it, for as long as he is engaged in eating or drinking the first he does not divert his mind without particular cause, unless he actually reconsidered; for such is a man’s way when he is engaged in eating or drinking: to be drawn onward, and dragged from one mouthful to another and from one draught to another.
But if he is drinking beer and they brought him fish to sweeten the drinking, then although all of it falls under a single blessing, and the fish are subordinate to the beer — since through them he drinks more — they are nevertheless not exempted by a single blessing, unless his mind was upon them, or they were before him at the time of the blessing, as will be explained in siman רי״ב (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim רי״ב).
(And if they brought before him of that very same kind, even if he already ate all of the first — he need not go back and bless, unless he actually reconsidered. But without particular cause he does not divert his mind from this kind that was before him at the time of the blessing, so as to hold back from eating more of it when it is brought before him, since a man’s way is to be drawn onward in eating and to increase in it once he has begun.)
And there are those who say that this was said only of a meal, in which a man establishes himself; but with fruits and the like, even if he establishes himself with them — his establishing is nothing, for there is no kevi’ut for fruits; and since his mind was not upon what was brought before him after the blessing, even if he did not actually reconsider — he must go back and bless in every case, even if they brought him of that very same kind, and even if he has not yet eaten the first.
And in a doubt concerning blessings one is lenient. Nevertheless, lekhathila it is good to take care to have in mind everything that will be brought to him.
And guests invited to eat kinds of fruit, since their mind relies upon the host who invited them — their mind is upon everything he will bring before them, as is explained in siman קע״ט (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim קע״ט). And even if he brought before them another kind after the first was gone — they need not go back and bless.

סעיף י הַשֵּׁנִי חָשׁוּב מִן הָרִאשׁוֹן — אֵינוֹ נִפְטָר בִּבְרָכָה סְתָמִית.

וְכָל זֶה כְּשֶׁהָרִאשׁוֹן וְהַשֵּׁנִי הֵם שָׁוִים בַּחֲשִׁיבוּת, שֶׁאֵין לָזֶה קְדִימָה עַל זֶה אִם הָיוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם לְפָנָיו, אֲבָל אִם הַשֵּׁנִי חָשׁוּב מֵהָרִאשׁוֹן מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא מִין ז׳, אוֹ שֶׁהוּא חָבִיב, עַל דֶּרֶךְ שֶׁיִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן רי״א — אֵינוֹ נִפְטָר בְּבִרְכַּת הָרִאשׁוֹן, אֲפִלּוּ אִם הוּא גַּם כֵּן לְפָנָיו בִּשְׁעַת הַבְּרָכָה אֶלָּא שֶׁבֵּרַךְ בִּסְתָם וְלֹא נִתְכַּוֵּן לִפְטֹר הַשֵּׁנִי בִּבְרָכָה זוֹ. וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁמִּן הַסְּתָם דַּעְתּוֹ עָלָיו, מִכָּל מָקוֹם אֵינוֹ בְּדִין שֶׁיִּפְטֹר שֶׁאֵינוֹ חָשׁוּב אֶת הֶחָשׁוּב בְּדֶרֶךְ גְּרָרָא, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן נִתְכַּוֵּן לְפָטְרוֹ בְּפֵרוּשׁ, אֲבָל לֹא בִּסְתָם (כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּסִימָן קע״ו).
וּכְשֶׁנִּתְכַּוֵּן לְפָטְרוֹ — פּוֹטְרוֹ אֲפִלּוּ לֹא הָיָה לְפָנָיו בִּשְׁעַת בְּרָכָה. וְאִם הֱבִיאוּהוּ לְפָנָיו בְּעוֹדוֹ מְבָרֵךְ, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהוּא יָפֶה מִן הָרִאשׁוֹן וְחָבִיב עָלָיו וְגַם הוּא מִין ז׳ — יֹאכַל תְּחִלָּה מִן הָרִאשׁוֹן (כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִתְחִיל עָלָיו הַבְּרָכָה שֶׁבֵּרַךְ עָלָיו):

And all this when the first and the second are equal in importance, neither having precedence over the other were both before him; but if the second is more important than the first, because it is of the seven species, or because it is beloved to him, in the manner that will be explained in siman רי״א (Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim רי״א) — it is not exempted by the blessing of the first, even if it too was before him at the time of the blessing, since he blessed without particular intent and did not intend to exempt the second with this blessing. And although, absent any specification, his mind is upon it, it is nevertheless not right that the unimportant should exempt the important by way of being dragged along, unless he explicitly intended to exempt it — but not without particular intent (as is explained in siman קע״ו, Shulchan Arukh HaRav, Orach Chayim קע״ו).
And when he did intend to exempt it — it exempts it even if it was not before him at the time of the blessing. And if they brought it before him while he was still blessing, even though it is finer than the first, and beloved to him, and also of the seven species — let him eat first of the first (since it is upon it that the blessing he recited began).

סעיף יא נָפַל הַפְּרִי מִיָּדוֹ אַחַר הַבְּרָכָה — וְהָעוֹמֵד עַל אַמַּת הַמַּיִם.

נָטַל בְּיָדוֹ פְּרִי לְאָכְלוֹ וּבֵרַךְ עָלָיו וְנָפַל מִיָּדוֹ וְנֶאֱבַד אוֹ נִמְאַס עַד שֶׁאֵינוֹ רָאוּי לַאֲכִילָה וְיֵשׁ מִמִּין זֶה לְפָנָיו עוֹד — צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ עֲלֵיהֶם, אֲפִלּוּ הָיְתָה דַּעְתּוֹ עֲלֵיהֶם כְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ, לְפִי שֶׁהַבְּרָכָה חָלָה עַל זֶה שֶׁאָחַז בְּיָדוֹ כְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ, וְזֶה פּוֹטֵר אֶת כֻּלָּם, אֲבָל כְּשֶׁלֹּא אָכַל אֶת זֶה — לֹא נִפְטַר בַּבְּרָכָה שֶׁבֵּרַךְ עַל זֶה.
וּמִכָּל מָקוֹם, הָעוֹמֵד עַל אַמַּת הַמַּיִם — מְבָרֵךְ וְשׁוֹתֶה אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהַמַּיִם שֶׁהָיוּ לְפָנָיו כְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ חָלְפוּ וְהָלְכוּ, לְפִי שֶׁלְּכָךְ נִתְכַּוֵּן מִתְּחִלָּה שֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁתּוֹת מַיִם אֵלּוּ אֶלָּא מַה שֶׁיָּבֹאוּ אַחַר בִּרְכָתוֹ, וַעֲלֵיהֶם חָלָה בִּרְכָתוֹ.
וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים, שֶׁהַבְּרָכָה חָלָה עַל כָּל מַה שֶּׁמּוּכָן לְפָנָיו וְדַעְתּוֹ עָלָיו, וְאֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ עָלָיו אִם נָפַל מִיָּדוֹ הַפְּרִי שֶׁבֵּרַךְ עָלָיו. וְכֵן אִם בֵּרַךְ עַל הַכּוֹס וְנִשְׁפַּךְ וְחוֹזֵר וּמְמַלְּאוֹ מִן הַקַּנְקַן שֶׁעוֹמֵד לְפָנָיו עַל הַשֻּׁלְחָן אוֹ עַל הַסַּפְסָל שֶׁאֶצְלוֹ מוּכָן לִשְׁתִיָּה — אֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ עָלָיו. וְכֵן עִקָּר, לְהָקֵל בִּסְפֵק בְּרָכוֹת.
וְהוּא שֶׁהָיְתָה דַּעְתּוֹ בְּבֵרוּר לֶאֱכֹל וְלִשְׁתּוֹת מִמַּה שֶּׁלְּפָנָיו, אַף אִם לֹא הָיָה נוֹפֵל מִיָּדוֹ מַה שֶּׁבֵּרַךְ עָלָיו, אֲבָל בִּסְתָם אֵין הַבְּרָכָה חָלָה אֶלָּא עַל מַה שֶּׁבְּיָדוֹ בִּשְׁעַת הַבְּרָכָה.
וַאֲפִלּוּ אִם הָיְתָה דַּעְתּוֹ בְּבֵרוּר לֶאֱכֹל וְלִשְׁתּוֹת עוֹד — אֵין הַבְּרָכָה חָלָה עַל זֶה אֶלָּא כְּשֶׁהוּא לְפָנָיו בִּשְׁעַת הַבְּרָכָה, אֲבָל אִם אַחַר כָּךְ הֱבִיאוּהוּ לְפָנָיו — צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ עָלָיו אִם נָפַל מַה שֶּׁבְּיָדוֹ מִמֶּנּוּ, אֲפִלּוּ בְּמָקוֹם שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה צָרִיךְ לְבָרֵךְ עָלָיו אִם הָיָה אוֹכֵל אוֹ שׁוֹתֶה מִמַּה שֶּׁבְּיָדוֹ כְּשֶׁבֵּרַךְ.
(וּבַמַּיִם שֶׁבְּאַמַּת הַמַּיִם, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהֵם מְעֹרָבִים וּמְחֻבָּרִים וְגוּף אֶחָד הֵם — הַבְּרָכָה עַל כֻּלָּם, אַף עַל מַה שֶּׁלֹּא הָיָה לְפָנָיו בִּשְׁעַת הַבְּרָכָה):

He took a fruit in his hand to eat it and blessed over it, and it fell from his hand and was lost, or became repulsive so as to be unfit to eat, and there is still more of this kind before him — he must go back and bless over them, even if his mind was upon them when he blessed, because the blessing took effect upon the one he held in his hand when he blessed, and that one exempts them all; but since he did not eat that one — they were not exempted by the blessing he recited over it.
And nevertheless, one standing at the water channel — blesses and drinks, even though the water that was before him when he blessed has flowed past and gone, since this was his intent from the outset: not to drink these waters but those that would come after his blessing, and it is upon them that his blessing took effect.
And there are those who say that the blessing takes effect upon everything that is prepared before him and upon which his mind rests, and he need not go back and bless over it if the fruit over which he blessed fell from his hand. And likewise, if he blessed over the cup and it spilled, and he fills it again from the jug that stands before him on the table, or on the bench beside him, ready for drinking — he need not go back and bless over it. And so is the essential ruling: to be lenient in a doubt concerning blessings.
And that is provided his mind was clearly set on eating and drinking of what is before him, even had what he blessed over not fallen from his hand; but absent explicit intent, the blessing takes effect only upon what is in his hand at the time of the blessing.
And even if his mind was clearly set on eating and drinking more — the blessing takes effect upon that only when it is before him at the time of the blessing; but if they brought it before him afterwards — he must go back and bless over it if what was in his hand fell from him, and this even in a case where he would not have needed to bless over it had he been eating or drinking of what was in his hand when he blessed.
(And as for the waters in the water channel, since they are mingled and joined and are a single body — the blessing is upon all of them, even upon what was not before him at the time of the blessing.)

סעיף יב מְבָרֵךְ לְהוֹצִיא אֲחֵרִים וְנָפַל מַה שֶּׁבְּיָדוֹ.

וְכָל זֶה כְּשֶׁאוֹכֵל אוֹ שׁוֹתֶה לְבַדּוֹ, אֲבָל אִם יֵשׁ אֲחֵרִים עִמּוֹ וְהוּא מְבָרֵךְ גַּם לָהֶם לְהוֹצִיאָם יְדֵי חוֹבָתָן וְנָפַל מַה שֶּׁבְּיָדוֹ אַחַר הַבְּרָכָה — יֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים שֶׁאֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ, כִּי הַבְּרָכָה חָלָה גַּם עַל מַה שֶּׁבְּיַד אֲחֵרִים, אֲפִלּוּ לֹא אָחֲזוּ בְּיָדָם אֶלָּא הָיָה לִפְנֵיהֶם — הַבְּרָכָה חָלָה עַל מַה שֶּׁלִּפְנֵיהֶם כְּשֶׁהֵם טוֹעֲמִים אַחַר בִּרְכָתוֹ, וְלָכֵן גַּם הוּא אֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ עַל מַה שֶּׁמְּבִיאִים לוֹ אַחַר כָּךְ, רַק שֶׁלֹּא יַפְסִיק בֵּינְתַיִם בְּשִׂיחָה:

And all this when he eats or drinks alone; but if there are others with him and he blesses for them too, in order to discharge their obligation, and what was in his hand fell after the blessing — there are those who say that he need not go back and bless, for the blessing took effect also upon what is in the hands of the others; and even if they did not hold it in their hands but it was before them — the blessing takes effect upon what is before them when they taste after his blessing; and therefore he too need not go back and bless over what they bring him afterwards, only that he must not interrupt in the meantime with conversation.

סעיף יג בְּרָכָה לְבַטָּלָה — בָּרוּךְ שֵׁם, וְהַנִּזְכָּר קֹדֶם הַזְכָּרַת הַשֵּׁם.

וְכָל מָקוֹם שֶׁהוּא צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְבָרֵךְ וּבִרְכָתוֹ הָרִאשׁוֹנָה הִיא לְבַטָּלָה — צָרִיךְ לוֹמַר אַחֲרֶיהָ: "בָּרוּךְ שֵׁם כְּבוֹד מַלְכוּתוֹ לְעוֹלָם וָעֶד". וְכֵן כָּל מִי שֶׁמַּזְכִּיר שֵׁם שָׁמַיִם לְבַטָּלָה.
וְאִם נָפַל מִיָּדוֹ הָאֹכֶל אוֹ נִשְׁפַּךְ הַכּוֹס קֹדֶם שֶׁאָמַר "אֱלֹהֵינוּ" — יְסַיֵּם וְיֹאמַר: "לַמְּדֵנִי חֻקֶּיךָ", שֶׁיְּהֵא נִרְאֶה כְּקוֹרֵא פָּסוּק, וְאֵין כָּאן הַזְכָּרַת שֵׁם שָׁמַיִם לְבַטָּלָה. וְכֵן כָּל בְּרָכָה לְבַטָּלָה שֶׁנִּזְכַּר קֹדֶם שֶׁיֹּאמַר "אֱלֹהֵינוּ":

And wherever he must go back and bless, his first blessing being in vain — he must say after it: barukh shem kevod malkhuto le’olam va’ed. And likewise anyone who mentions the Name of Heaven in vain.
And if the food fell from his hand or the cup spilled before he said Elokeinu — let him complete it and say: lamdeni chukekha, so that it appear as the reading of a verse, and there is here no mention of the Name of Heaven in vain. And likewise for any blessing in vain that he recalls before he says Elokeinu.

סעיף יד בֵּרַךְ עַל הַמַּיִם וְשָׁמַע שֶׁיֵּשׁ מֵת בַּשְּׁכוּנָה, אוֹ שֶׁהַתְּקוּפָה נוֹפֶלֶת.

בֵּרַךְ עַל הַמַּיִם וְשָׁמַע שֶׁיֵּשׁ מֵת בַּשְּׁכוּנָה, וּמִנְהָג לִשְׁפֹּךְ כָּל מַיִם שְׁאוּבִין שֶׁבִּשְׁכוּנַת הַמֵּת — יִשְׁתֶּה מְעַט מִן הַמַּיִם שֶׁלֹּא תְּהֵא בִּרְכָתוֹ לְבַטָּלָה וְאַחַר כָּךְ יִשְׁפֹּךְ הַשְּׁאָר. וְאַף לְהָאוֹמְרִים שֶׁטַּעַם הַמִּנְהָג הוּא מִפְּנֵי שֶׁמַּלְאַךְ הַמָּוֶת מַטִּיל טִפַּת דַּם הַמָּוֶת בַּמַּיִם וְהַשּׁוֹתֶה מֵהֶן מִסְתַּכֵּן, מִכָּל מָקוֹם "שׁוֹמֵר מִצְוָה לֹא יֵדַע דָּבָר רָע", וּמֵאַחַר שֶׁשָּׁתָה מְעַט שֶׁאֵין בִּרְכָתוֹ לְבַטָּלָה — יִשְׁפֹּךְ הַשְּׁאָר מִשּׁוּם חֲשַׁשׁ סַכָּנָה.
וְאִם שָׁמַע שֶׁהַתְּקוּפָה נוֹפֶלֶת — יַמְתִּין מְעַט עַד שֶׁעָבְרָה הַתְּקוּפָה וְיִשְׁתֶּה, כִּי יֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים שֶׁאֵין סַכָּנָה בָּהֶם אֶלָּא לִשְׁתּוֹת בִּשְׁעַת הַתְּקוּפָה. וְאַף הָאוֹמְרִים שֶׁכָּל שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה בָּהֶם בַּרְזֶל בִּשְׁעַת הַתְּקוּפָה יֵשׁ סַכָּנָה לִשְׁתּוֹת מֵהֶם גַּם אַחַר כָּךְ, מִכָּל מָקוֹם "שׁוֹמֵר מִצְוָה לֹא יֵדַע דָּבָר רָע":

He blessed over water and heard that there is a dead person in the neighbourhood, and the custom is to pour out all drawn water in the neighbourhood of the dead — let him drink a little of the water, so that his blessing not be in vain, and afterwards let him pour out the rest. And even according to those who say that the reason for the custom is that the angel of death casts a drop of the blood of death into the water, and whoever drinks of it is endangered — even so, one who keeps the commandment shall know no evil thing; and since he drank a little, so that his blessing is not in vain — let him pour out the rest, on account of the concern of danger.
And if he heard that the tekufah is falling — let him wait a little, until the tekufah has passed, and drink, for there are those who say that there is danger only in drinking at the very hour of the tekufah. And even according to those who say that any water in which there was no iron at the hour of the tekufah is dangerous to drink even afterwards — even so, one who keeps the commandment shall know no evil thing.

סעיף טו הַשּׁוֹפֵךְ מְעַט מִשּׁוּם מַיִם הָרָעִים — יִשְׁפֹּךְ קֹדֶם הַבְּרָכָה.

הַשּׁוֹתֶה מַיִם וְשׁוֹפֵךְ מְעַט קֹדֶם שְׁתִיָּתוֹ מִשּׁוּם חֲשַׁשׁ מַיִם הָרָעִים — יִשְׁפֹּךְ קֹדֶם שֶׁיַּתְחִיל לְבָרֵךְ וְלֹא אַחַר הַבְּרָכָה, מִשּׁוּם בִּזְיוֹן הַבְּרָכָה:

One who drinks water and pours out a little before drinking, on account of the concern of the bad waters — let him pour it out before he begins to bless, and not after the blessing, because of the disgrace it would be to the blessing.

2 · למעשה

הלכה למעשה — מנהג חב״ד

Practical Habad conduct

Points of conduct that follow directly from siman ר״ו in the sensibility of the Alter Rebbe and of Habad — presented at the level of principle, referring to the Rav for the detail of cases.

For the Habad Hassid — Siman ר״ו (דִּין הֶפְסֵק וְטָעוּת בְּבִרְכַּת הַפֵּרוֹת)

  • ① Seif א. Error is not symmetrical. Haadama said over a fruit of the tree discharges the obligation — the tree itself is rooted in the ground; haetz said over a fruit of the ground does not. Hence the Rav’s way out of doubt: say haadama, and be covered mimah nafshakh. And chehakol covers everything, even bread and wine. But all of this is only bediavad: lekhathila each food takes the blessing that belongs to it — and the recourse to doubt is open only to one for whom the doubt arose after he had learned.
  • ② Seif ב. Haadama said over a fruit of the ground does not carry with it the tree-fruit lying beside it: the exemption works only if the blessing was said over the tree-fruit itself. Everything therefore hangs on intent — and intent is powerful: the intent to include the tree-fruit exempts it even if it was not yet before him and was brought only afterwards.
  • ③ Seif ג. Between the blessing and the first mouthful nothing may come in — not even honour, not even reverent fear. A word unrelated to the eating obliges one to bless again. Even silence must not stretch beyond kdei dibbur — the time of a student’s greeting to his master, three words; yet if one did tarry without speaking, one does not bless again. A delay that serves the eating, by contrast, is no interruption at all, even lekhathila: one cuts the fruit only after blessing, so as to bless over the whole fruit, lemitzvah min hamuvchar. And a practical exception closes the seif: the nut, which one breaks before blessing, lest it be worm-eaten or rotten and the blessing be levatala.
  • ④ Seif ד. All blessings may be said in any language. The Rav does not reopen the question of understanding here: he refers to siman קפ״ה.
  • ⑤ Seif ה. Making the blessing audible to one’s own ears is the lekhathila requirement; failing to do so does not invalidate. The real threshold lies elsewhere: the words must have been articulated with the lips — thought alone does not make a blessing.
  • ⑥ Seif ו. The conditions of a blessing are those of Shema: no excrement, no urine, no uncovered ervah, no heart seeing the ervah. The Rav records the classic distinction between woman and man, grounded in what is in fact covered in a seated posture.
  • ⑦ Seif ז. One does not bless bareheaded. Here the Rav is content to refer to siman צ״א, where the matter is treated at length.
  • ⑧ Seif ח. Hold in your right hand what you bless over — food, fragrance, an object of mitzvah. And the Rav adds the inner dimension that is his hallmark: by way of Kabbalah, one should not spear the fruit with a knife held in the right hand, for they are two opposites in a single subject — the right hand, whence come the issues of life, and the knife, which is the power of Esav and shortens life.
  • ⑨ Seif ט. Not having held the food is not fatal if it was before him; but blessing over what is absent, even with it in mind, obliges one to bless again. The rest of the seif governs what is brought afterwards: the same kind, or a kind covered by the first blessing — nothing to repeat if it was in mind, even without an explicit intent to exempt. Without that, one blesses again if the first is already eaten; but so long as some of the first remains and what is brought resembles it (fruit and fruit, drink and drink), one does not: an eater is drawn on from mouthful to mouthful, and there is hesach hadaat only if he truly reconsidered. Fish brought to sharpen the beer is the exception. Against the yesh omrim for whom there is no kevi’ut for fruits, the Rav rules: safek berakhot lehakel — but lekhathila, have in mind whatever will be brought. And a guest leans on his host’s intent.
  • ⑩ Seif י. All this holds between foods of equal importance. If the second is the more important — of the seven species, or beloved — a blessing said without particular intent does not exempt it, even if it was already on the table: it is not right that the lesser should drag the greater along. Explicit intent is required; and that intent, where it exists, reaches even what was not before him. Finally, if it is brought while he is still blessing, he eats first of the first — the one on which the blessing began.
  • ⑪ Seif יא. The fruit that falls and is lost, or turns repulsive: according to the first view the blessing settled only on what he held, and he must bless again over the rest; the man standing at the water channel is the exception, for he never had that particular water in view. The yesh omrim extends the blessing to everything ready before him and present to his mind — a cup spilled and refilled from the jug on the table: no new blessing. And this is the Rav’s conclusion — vechen ikkar, be lenient in a doubt of blessings — under the two conditions he at once adds: a clear intent, and a food already present when he blessed.
  • ⑫ Seif יב. Blessing on behalf of others widens the reach of the blessing: it settles also on what is in the others’ hands, or merely before them, once they taste after him. Hence the consequence for himself: what is brought to him afterwards needs no new blessing — provided only that he did not speak in the meantime.
  • ⑬ Seif יג. Any blessing that turns out to be levatala can be repaired: one says after it barukh shem kevod malkhuto le’olam va’ed — as does anyone who mentions the Name in vain. And if the mishap occurs before the word Elokeinu, one continues lamdeni chukekha: the sentence then reads as a verse, and the Name was not mentioned in vain. The Rav generalizes this exit to any blessing in vain caught in time.
  • ⑭ Seif יד. A custom does not override a blessing already said: one who blessed over water and hears that there is a dead person in the neighbourhood drinks a little — so that his blessing not be in vain — and then pours out the rest. Even on the reading that the danger is real, shomer mitzvah lo yeda davar ra covers him for that sip; the rest he pours out as a precaution. And at the hour of the tekufah he simply waits for it to pass before drinking.
  • ⑮ Seif טו. The siman closes on a matter of order, not of prohibition: one whose practice is to pour out a little water before drinking, out of concern for the bad waters, should pour it before beginning the blessing and not after — pouring afterwards would be a slight to the blessing.

⚠ This section presents Habad conduct grounded in the Alter Rebbe’s Shulchan Aruch, siman ר״ו (the real text is reproduced in §1). It does not replace a rabbinic ruling in a particular case. For any concrete question — a blessing said in error, an interruption, food brought after the fact, a blessing feared to be in vain — ask your Rav, and for Habad, a Habad Rav.